Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: v p mohan kumar and · Page 1 of about 71 results (0.396 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 20 1996

i.T.C. Ltd. Vs. Presiding Officer, Ii Additional Labour Court and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-20-1996

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10(4), 10A and 17 and 17B

Reported in : (1997)ILLJ589Kant

ORDER1. The petitioner challenges an interim order passed by the II Additional Labour Court, Bangalore, in I.D. No. 117/90 dated October 10, 1995 - Annexure - A, by which an interim relief has been granted to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 02 1997

Smt. Rahamat Be Vs. Office of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-02-1997

Subject : Service

Reported in : ILR1997KAR1201

Advocate for Respondent : Sri D.V. Shailendra Kumar, Central Government Standing Counsel and ;Sri Basavraj V. Sabarad, Adv.

ORDER1. The husband of the petitioner herein late Abdul Sattar was employed by the K.S.R.T.C. He joined service on 6-7-1962. With effect from 1-3-1971 the Employees' Provident Fund Pension Scheme was made applicable to the Corporation...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 05 1994

Laxmi Marketing Corporation Vs. Karnataka State Electronics Developmen ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-05-1994

Subject : Company

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 126

Reported in : [1995]82CompCas447a(Kar); 1994(3)KarLJ159

Advocate for Respondent : L.S. Harsha Kumar Gowda, Adv.

V.P. Mohan Kumar, J.1. The plaintiff is the appellant. The suit is one for permanent injunction restraining the first defendant from enforcing a bank guarantee executed by the second defendant. Along with the suit, a temporary...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 09 1999

Management of Jyothi Home Industries and Others Vs. State of Karnataka ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-09-1999

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3(1), 4(1), 5(1), 9, 25 and 27; Constitution of India - Article 43

Reported in : [2000(84)FLR391]; 2001(2)KarLJ217; (2000)ILLJ596Kant

Advocate for Respondent : Sri R.I. D'sa, Government Advocate, ;Sri K. Channabasappa, ;Sri M.C. Narasimhan, ;Sri K.S. Subramaniya, ;Sri V.H. Upadyaya, ;Sri T.S. Anantharaman and ;Sri Ramakrishna, Advs.

ORDERV.P. Mohan Kumar, J.1. It has been recognised that the payment of the minimum wages to a worker by the employer has to be guaranteed by the State. Though, the Supreme Court of the United States...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 13 1995

Shanthabai and Others Vs. Shekappa and Others

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-13-1995

Subject : Company

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 95

Reported in : II(1995)ACC506; 1995ACJ974; [1995]84CompCas796(Kar); ILR1995KAR1637; 1995(2)KarLJ268

Advocate for Respondent : S.P. Shankar, Adv.

V.P. Mohan Kumar, J. 1. The question raised in this appeal relates to the extent of liability of the insurance company to indemnify the compensation payable under the Motor Vehicles Act to passengers travelling in a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 1999

Krishna Reddy Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-05-1999

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Agricultural Marketing Act, 1958 - Sections 19 and 159

Reported in : 2001(3)KarLJ44

Advocate for Respondent : Sri Tarakaram, Senior Adv. and ;Smt. Roja Paramel, Government Pleader

ORDERV.P. Mohan Kumar, J.1. The petitioner challenges Annexure-E order. There was a civil dispute between the predecessor of the petitioner-Jangama Reddy on the one hand and that of the father of the 4th respondent claiming title...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 08 1996

Hubert Lobo Vs. the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Mangalore and ors ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-08-1996

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation Servants (Conduct and Discipline) Regulations, 1971 - Regulation 18-A

Reported in : 1997(4)KarLJ524

Advocate for Respondent : Sri. N.D.R. Ramachandra Rao, Adv.

ORDERV.P. Mohan Kumar, J.1. The petitioner herein challenges the award passed by the Labour Court. The worker-petitioner herein was driver of the vehicle bearing No. MYF 9032 on March 29, 1987. While he was driving the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 25 1996

Afsar Banu and ors. Vs. the Labour Officer and Commissioner for Workme ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-25-1996

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 31

Reported in : II(1998)ACC99; ILR1997KAR811; 1997(4)KarLJ536

Advocate for Respondent : Sri. H.G. Ramesh, Adv.

ORDERV.P. Mohan Kumar, J.1. Petitioners herein are the legal representatives of one deceased Syed Hayath Peer alias Pyaru. He died in an accident. They filed a claim petition under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, seeking compensation....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 04 2000

Chief General Manager, Reserve Bank of India, Bangalore Vs. Presiding ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-04-2000

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10(4), 11, 12(1), 15, 18(1), 21-T and 25-B; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 21, 39, 226 and 227

Reported in : ILR2000KAR4356; 2001(3)KarLJ137; (2000)IIILLJ6Kant

Advocate for Respondent : Sri. G. Papireddy, Government Adv. and ;Sri N.G. Phadke, Adv.

ORDERV. Gopala Gowda, J. 1. The petitioner Reserve Bank of India (in short, 'Bank') has filed this writ petition challenging the legality and validity of the award passed by the first respondent, Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 24 1996

Canara Motor Transport Company, Koppa, Chickmagalur Vs. K.M. Aboobakke ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-24-1996

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Sections 7; Payment of Gratuity (Karnataka) Rules, 1972 - Rule 10(1); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1997(4)KarLJ449

Advocate for Respondent : Sri. V.H. Upadhyaya, Adv.

ORDERV.P. Mohan Kumar, J.1. The petitioner challenges Annexure-A order passed by the 6th respondent herein in a proceeding initiated by the 1st respondent. The 1st respondent alleged that he was employed by the 2nd respondent and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial