Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: v p mathur · Page 1 of about 64 results (0.132 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 07 1988

V.P. Mathur Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-07-1988

Subject : Service

Acts : Central Reserve Police Force Rules, 1955 - Rule 8

Reported in : 77(1999)DLT448; 1999(48)DRJ402

K. Ramamoorthy, J.(1) The facts that are necessary for the disposal of this writ petition could be stated briefly thus: On the 2nd of February, 1964, the petitioner joined the Indian Army as Emergency Commissioned Officer....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 1985

Yashwant Gauri Shanker Trivedi Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-22-1985

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1985(2)WLN681

Surendra Nath Bhargava, J.1. The petitioner was initially appointed as Food Assistant in Agricultural department vide order dated 22-7-1950 in the grade of 100-5-115-10-200. The petitioner thereafter was selected on the post of Food Assistant by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 1988

Sir Shadi Lal Enterprises Ltd. and anr. Vs. Chief Judicial Magistrate ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-23-1988

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1990CriLJ522

Advocate for Respondent : A.G.A. and ;H.N. Tripathi, Adv. for Opposite Party No. 2

ORDERV.P. Mathur, J.1. After hearing the learned counsel on both sides and in view of the undertaking given on behalf of the petitoner, the following order is passed:Complete stoppage of the discharge of effluents from the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 02 1972

Pratap NaraIn and anr. Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-02-1972

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1972CriLJ950

ORDERS. Malik, J.1. The learned Counsel for Pratap Narain and Bankey Lal conceded at the outset that as there is no provision in the Code of Criminal Procedure under which an appeal may lie to this...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 16 2001

Sumit Kumar and ors. Vs. Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission, Alla ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-16-2001

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh State Public Service Commission (Regulation of Procedure) Act, 1985 - Sections 10 and 10(3)

Reported in : 2001(4)AWC2805; (2001)3UPLBEC2310

Advocate for Respondent : B.N. Singh, Adv.

S.R. Singh, J.1. The petitioners in this bunch of writ petitions applied for and appeared in the U. P. Combined State/Subordinate Services (Pre) Examination, 2001. On the declaration of result on 28.6.2001, they found themselves to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 2003

Lala Ram and ors. (In Jail) Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-22-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300, 302 and 304

Reported in : 2003CriLJ4631

Advocate for Respondent : A.G.A.

D.P. Gupta, J. 1.This is a case in which accused appellants killed Mani Ram and injured PW 1 Babu Ram after picking up quarrel on a petty issue. IVth Additional Sessions Judge, Pilibhit, in S. T....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 01 2002

Surya Nath and ors. Vs. Imam Ali and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-01-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324 and 325

Reported in : 2002CriLJ2207

Advocate for Respondent : A.G.A.

ORDERU.S. Tripathi, J.1. This revision has been directed against the judgment and order dated 12-4-1984 passed by 4th Additional District and Sessions Judge, Basti in Criminal Revision No.298 of 1981 allowing the revision filed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 13 2002

U.P. State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Co ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-13-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2003(1)AWC372

Advocate for Respondent : R.N. Tripathi and ;B.P. Yadav, Advs. and ;S.C.

A.K. Yog, J.1. List has been revised. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. Sri. R.N. Tripathi, advocate learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No. 2 is present.2. Name of two counsel are shown...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 24 2017

Sanjoy Alias Sanjay Sinha Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through Vigilance

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jan-24-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 9846 of 2016 Sanjoy @ Sanjay Sinha …Petitioner -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand through Vigilance ...Opp.Party CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 1999

Kali Charan Rai and ors. Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Decided on : Sep-14-1999

Subject : Criminal

1. The record of this case has been placed before us for passing final judgment after the decision of the learned Single Judge to whom the case was referred on difference of opinion between us.2. On...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial