Advanced Search Results

B.K. Dastur and anr. Vs. N. Rajaram and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : LimitationCivil

Reported in : (1987)1MLJ398

Mohan, J.1. Defendants 2, 3 and 4 are appellants in this appeal.2. The appeal arises out of O.S. No. 1184 of 1976 on the file of the Second Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Madras. The suit...

M V Nataraj vs Harish

Court : Karnataka

-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NO. 19 OF 2025 (RO) C/W REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1558...

Madras Aluminium Company Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ors ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 3(1) and 18

Reported in : [2000]101CompCas162(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : R. Krishnamoorthy, Sr. Counsel and ;V. Nataraj, Adv. for Respondent No. 3 in W.P. No. 151 of 1998, ;G. Sankaran, Govt. Adv. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in W.P. No. 19331 of 1997 and W.M.P. No. 30295 a

ORDER1. The Madras Aluminium Company Limited is a public limited company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956. The company incurred heavy losses and finally it came under the purview of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special...

A. Velliangiri (Deceased) and 3 Others Vs. M/S. Ram Bahadur Takur (P)l ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : ContractProperty

Acts : Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973; Specific Relief Act, 1963 -- Sections 22, 28(3); Transfer of Property Act, 1882-- Sections 52

Reported in : 1998(1)CTC436; (1998)IIMLJ298

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.C.A. Sundaram,;Sr. Counsel for Mr. V. Nataraj,;Mr. Poornam for M/s King &;Partridge

ORDER1. The plaintiff in the suit C.S.No. 237 of 1986 has filed this appeal, aggrieved by the order dated 26.7.1989 made in application No. 1818 of 1987 revoking the leave granted holding that this Court, on...

Ram Narayan Bhattad Vs. Krishna Bai Jhaver and Six ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 38, 39, 42 - Order 21, Rules 5 and 21; Original Side Rules (High Court) - Order 39, Rules 2, 5 and 6

Reported in : 2004(2)CTC81

Advocate for Respondent : R. Krishnamurthy, Sr. Counsel for ;V. Nataraj, Adv. for R6 and R7, in O.S.A. No. 46 to 50, 54 to 56, 68 and 69 and for R1 and R5, in O.S.A. 51 to 53, 66 and 67/91, ;A.L. Somayaji, Sr. Counsel and ;K.

ORDERK. Govindarajan, J.1. The above Appeals are filed by the assignee-decree holder of the decree granted in C.S.No. 28/1975 having aggrieved by the orders passed by the learned single Judge in various Applications. Since the issue...

Dr. S. Kameswaran Vs. A. Jayaraman and Another

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 -- Order 1 and 8A, Rule 10

Reported in : 1998(2)CTC470

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. V. Nataraj and;C.A. Sundaram, Senior Counsel

ORDERJudgement pronounced by C. Shivappa, J.1. This appeal is directed against the rejection of an application for impleading the proposed party as the additional party defendant in the suit. The learned counsel for the appellant contended...

The State of Tamil Nadu Vs. Parry and Company

Court : Chennai

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1976]38STC122(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : V. Nataraj, Adv. for ;King and ;Partridge, Advs.

V. Ramaswami, J.1. These two tax cases relate to the assessment years 1962-63 and 1963-64 and raise a common question as to the taxability of certain transport charges. The respondent-assessee claimed that these freight charges have...

The State of Tamil Nadu Vs. Binny's Engineering Works Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1975]35STC260(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : V. Nataraj and ; S. Ramasubramaniam, Advs. ;for King and ; Partridge, Advs.

Ramanujam, J.1. The assessees in this case had effected sales of refreshments in the canteen run by them for the benefit of their employees in discharge of their obligation under the Factories Act, in the assessment...

Donghee Vision Industrial Company Ltd. Vs. Tube Investments of India L ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433; Company (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 28 and 28(2)

Reported in : [2001]104CompCas460(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : C.A. Sundaram, Adv. for ;S.V. Nataraj, Adv. and ;Official Liquidator for respondent No. 2

N.V. Balasubramanian, J.1. This application is filed to set aside the order dated September 29, 2000, passed in C. P. No. 90 of 2000, winding up the applicant-company, and to restore C. P. No. 90 of...

Associated Engg. Construction Vs. Fourth Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1988)27ITD380(Mum.)

1. These cross-appeals before us arise out of the CIT (A)'s order relating to assessment for 1976-77. The essential question in the appeal by the assessee (firm), which we deal first, has relation to an addition...