Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: v n agarwal · Page 1 of about 27 results (0.076 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 06 2002

Mustafa HussaIn Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-06-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Temporary Government Servants (Termination of Services) Rules, 1975 - Rules 5 and 6

Reported in : 2002(2)AWC951; [2002(94)FLR951]

Advocate for Respondent : S.C. and ;V.N. Agarwal, Adv.

D.S. Sinha, J.1. Heard Sri S.A. Gilani, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri V.N. Agarwal, learned standing counsel of the State of U.P., representing the respondents.2. Instant writ petition under Article 226 of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 11 2002

Rajendra Singh Vs. Accountant General, U.P., Lekha Ii and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-11-2002

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2002(3)AWC1804; (2002)3UPLBEC2118

Advocate for Respondent : V.N. Agarwal, Adv. and ;U.N. Sharma, S.C.

S.N. Srivastava, J. 1. By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner made following prayers : (i) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to give pension...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 23 2002

i.T.C. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-23-2002

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 49, 49(2), 50 and 112; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 23(3); Constitution of India - Article 367; Uttar Pradesh Factories Welfare Officers Rules, 1955 - Rule 3; Uttar Pradesh Factories Welfare Officers (Amendment) Rules, 1980

Reported in : 2003(1)AWC91; (2003)ILLJ442All

Advocate for Respondent : K.P. Agarwal and ;V.N. Agarwal, Advs. and ;Yashwant Verma, S.C.

S.N. Srivastava, J. 1. Petitioner is a company within the meaning of the Indian Companies Act, 1956, with a workforce of 1542 workmen on its roll. The State of U. P. issued notification dated 27.2.1990 (Annexure-1...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 12 2006

Youth Hostel Through Its Warden Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court an ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-12-2006

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2K, 4K and 6N; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16

Reported in : 2006(4)AWC3655; [2006(111)FLR33]

Advocate for Respondent : V.N. Agarwal and ;Surya Prakash Singh, Advs. and ;S.C.

Rajes Kumar, J.1. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the award dated 28.11.2003 passed by the respondent No. 1 in Industrial Dispute No. 71 of 2001, Smt. Anita Sharma v. Youth...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 03 2003

Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology and anr. ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-03-2003

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 166 and 168

Reported in : I(2004)ACC251; 2003(3)AWC2589

Advocate for Respondent : V.N. Agarwal, Adv.

A.K. Yog and Ghanshyam Dass,JJ. 1. Heard Dr. R.G. Padia, senior advocate, assisted by Sri A.K. Dubey, on behalf of appellants and Sri V.N. Agarwal, advocate, on behalf of claimant-respondents and perused the record.2. One Dr....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 01 2002

Abdul Aziz Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-01-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 17(3)

Reported in : 2002(3)AWC1802

Advocate for Respondent : V.N. Agarwal, S.C.

S.N. Srivastava, J. 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order passed by the Additional District Magistrate (Administration), Moradabad, cancelling Licence No. 3568 of DBBL Gun No. 1006/1048 D/7. The order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 23 2001

Kamleshwar Nath Srivastava Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-23-2001

Subject : Service

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order XLVII, Rules 1 and 2; Indian Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5

Reported in : 2002(1)AWC138; [2002(92)FLR199]; (2002)1UPLBEC608

Advocate for Respondent : V.N. Agarwal, S.C.

D.S. Singh, J. 1. Heard Sri B.P. Srivastava, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner-applicant, and Sri V.N. Agarwal, learned standing counsel of the State of U.P., representing the respondents. 2. After the lapse of an interminable...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 12 2000

Dhirendra Kumar Gautam Vs. U.P. Public Services Tribunal, Lucknow and ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-12-2000

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; U.P. Temporary Government Servants (Termination of Service) Rules, 1975

Reported in : 2001(1)AWC689; [2001(88)FLR757]

Advocate for Respondent : V.N. Agarwal, Adv. and ;S.C.

D. S. Sinha, J.1. Heard Sri Mahesh Gautam, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, and Sri V. N. Agarwal, the learned standing counsel of the State of U. P., representing the respondents.2. Dhirendra Kumar Gautam,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 08 2001

Amrit Lal Vs. U.P. Public Services Tribunal, Lucknow and Another

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-08-2001

Subject : Service

Acts : Public Service Commission) Rules, 1979 - Rule 9; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2001(1)AWC787; [2001(88)FLR908]; (2001)1UPLBEC585

Advocate for Respondent : V.N. Agarwal and ;S.C., Advs.

ORDERD. S. Sinha, J.1. Heard Sri Mahendra Pal Singh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, and Sri V. N. Agarwal, learned standing counsel of the State of U. P., representing the respondents.2. Order and judgment of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 2002

Dhirendra Chaturvedi Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-14-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Service of Engineer Class II (Irrigation Branch) Rules, 1936 - Rule 5

Reported in : 2002(2)AWC1280; [2002(95)FLR501]; (2002)3UPLBEC2528

Advocate for Respondent : V.N. Agarwal, S.C.

D.S. Sinha and S.N. Srivastava, JJ. 1. Heard Sri A. K. Gupta, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri V. N. Agarwal, learned standing counsel for the State of U. P., representing the respondents. 2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial