Advanced Search Results

Mohanlal S/O Nandram Choudhari Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 125, 397, 397(1), 397(3), 438, 438(1) and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 411, 417 and 420; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 32, 136, 226 and 227

Reported in : 2007CriLJ4656; 2007(4)MhLj9

Advocate for Respondent : S.U. Deopujari, A.P.P. for Respondent No. 1 and ;S.V. Manohar, Amicus Curiae

ORDERA.P. Lavande, J.1. Heard Mr. V.V. Bhangde, learned Counsel for the applicant, Mr. S.U. Deopujari, learned A.P.P. for the respondent No. 1 and Mr. S.V. Manohar, learned amicus curiae.2. The applicant has filed this application under...

Garware Wall Ropes Ltd. a Company Incorporated Under the Companies Act ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 2(1), 6, 8, 10, 11, 11A, 11B, 12, 13, 14, 35 to 42, 47, 47(1), 47(2), 47(3), 47(4), 48, 57, 58, 64, 64(1), 64(3), 99, 100, 100(1), 101(3), 101(5), 103, 107, 156, 177 and 240; Patents and Designs Act, 1911; Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005; Patents (Amendment) Ordinance, 2005; Patents Rules, 2003; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(23)

Reported in : 2009(3)BomCR896; 2009(111)BomLR479

Advocate for Respondent : S.V. Manohar, Adv. for Respdt. No. 1 and ;R.P. Darda, Adv. for Respdt. No. 2

A.B. Chaudhari, J.1. Heard. Admit. Heard finally by consent of the parties.2. Being aggrieved by the order, below Exh. 4, dated 18.6.2007 in Civil Suit No. 2/2007 (Garware Wall Ropes Limited.v. A.I. Chopra and Anr.), rejecting...

Atlas Transport Company Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 299

Reported in : 2004(3)MhLj809

Advocate for Respondent : Shekhar Nafde, Special Counsel for Respondents No. 1 to 4 and ;S.V. Manohar, Adv. for respondent No. 5

B.R. Gavai, J.1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of parties.2. The decision of the respondent No. 1 State Government rejecting the tender of the petitioner for the transportation of foodgrains and other...

Malkhan Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Delhi Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1970 - Rule 22

Reported in : AIR1997SC465; [1997(75)FLR786]; JT1997(1)SC363; 1997(1)SCALE132; (1997)2SCC33a; [1997]1SCR64

SUJATA V. MANOHAR, J.1. The petitioner is a practising advocate of more than 21 years' standing. He applied for the post of an Additional District and Sessions Judge in the Delhi Higher Judicial Service in response...

Dr. Sanjay Manmal Sanghavi Vs. State of Maharashtra Adn Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Contitution of India - Articles 15(1), 29(2) and 226 - Rules 5, 6 and 7

Reported in : AIR1990Bom232

Advocate for Respondent : M.A. Garud, Addl. Govt. Pleader,;Mrs. Shinde and;S.V. Manohar, Advs.

ORDERDeshpande, J.1. By this petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner seeks a direction for quashing the selection of the respondents 4 & 5 for the Post Graduate three-year Degree course in Orthopaedics and...

Land Acquisition Officer (Rdo) Vs. M. Narayana and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 23; Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Areas Land Transfer Regulation, 1959

Reported in : 1996(1)ALT655

Advocate for Respondent : V. Manohar Rao, Adv.

Motilal B. Naik, J. 1. Appeal No. 3401/92, 863/92, 91/93, 165/93, 394/93, 402/93, 602/93, 940/93 and 775/93 arise out of a common order passed in O.P.Nos. 33/88, 42/88, 44/88, 1/89, 7/89, 13/89, 5/89, 35/88 and 38/88...

Alapati Mohan Rao Vs. Boyapati Venkateswara Rao

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 8, Rule 3

Reported in : 2008(1)ALD546; 2008(3)ALT27

Advocate for Respondent : V. Manohar Rao, Adv.

ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The respondent filed O.S. No. 41 of 2005 against the petitioner in the Court of II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Guntur, for recovery of amount, on the strength of a promissory note....

State of Haryana Vs. Amarjit Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Haryana Food and Supplies Department Sub-Offices (Group C) Service Rules, 1982

Reported in : JT1997(Suppl1)SC734; (1996)11SCC725

S.C. Agrawal and; Sujata V. Manohar, JJ.1. This appeal is directed against the orders dated 10-12-1993 in RA No. 41-C of 1993 arising out of a civil suit filed by the respondent.2. The respondent was initially...

Dr R.K.S. Chauhan and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : U.P. Agriculture Service, Class I Rules, 1934 - Rule 30(1); Constitution Of India - Articles 226, 227

Reported in : 1995Supp(3)SCC688

A.M. Ahmadi, C.J.,; S. Mohan and; Sujata V. Manohar, JJ.1. The question of promotion from the post of Assistant Director to that of Joint Director had to be considered in accordance with the U.P. Agricultural Department...

Arvind Laxmanrao Kinge Vs. State of Maharashtra, Urban Development Pub ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Admission to Post Graduate Courses in Medical Colleges Rules - Rule 5; Medical Council Act, 1956 - Sections 33; Constitution of India - Article 162

Reported in : 1988(1)BomCR280; 1988MhLJ575

Advocate for Respondent : B.P. Jaiswal A.G.P., ; S.V. Manohar, Adv. for respondents 2, 3, 5 and 6 in W.P. 1592/86 and ; V.S. Sirpurkar, Adv. for respondent No. 3 in W.P. 1687/86

H.W. Dhabe, J.1. All these writ petitions can conveniently be disposed of by this common judgment Broadly speaking, these writ petitions fall into two groups. The first group is of writ petitions in which the petitioners...