Advanced Search Results

Channappa Girimalappa Jolad Vs. the Bagalkot Bank and Shankardas Vishn ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1942Bom338; (1942)44BOMLR735

Beaumont, C.J.1. This is an appeal against a decision of the First Class Subordinate Judge of Bijapur, and it arises in this way.2. In 1933 the plaintiff, who was a minor, filed a suit to recover...

Kanchalal Chandulal Parikh and Another Vs. Bank of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Sick Textile Undertaking (Taking Over of Management) Act, 1972 - Sections 27; Sick Textile Undertakings (Nationalisation) Act, 1974 - Sections 21 and 24

Reported in : 1988(1)BomCR519; (1987)89BOMLR565; [1991]70CompCas528(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : A.N. Mody, Adv.

Bharucha, J. 1. The appeal is directed against the judgment and order of Penside J. decreeing the suit filed by the first respondent. 2. The facts that gave rise to file the suit, shortly stated, are...

Rama Kallappa Pujari Vs. Saidappa Sidrama Pujari

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilProperty

Reported in : AIR1935Bom306; (1935)37BOMLR336; 157Ind.Cas.634

John Beaumont Kt., C.J.1. This is a second appeal from the decision of the Assistant Judge at Belgaum, and it raises a short point of law. The plaintiff filed1 a suit for partition, and on January...

M/S the Rameshwara Jute Mills Limited vs.m/s Universal Cables Limited ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

$~85 & 86 * % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:27. h September, 2018 FAO(OS) (COMM) 212/2018 M/S THE RAMESHWARA JUTE MILLS LIMITED..... Appellant Through: Mr Rajeev Virmani,...

Jute Investment Company Limited vs.idbi Capital Market Services Limite ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

$~85 & 86 * % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:27. h September, 2018 FAO(OS) (COMM) 212/2018 M/S THE RAMESHWARA JUTE MILLS LIMITED..... Appellant Through: Mr Rajeev Virmani,...

Vir Singh Vs. Ashok Kumar and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939

Reported in : RLW2003(4)Raj2675; 2003(3)WLC177

Advocate for Respondent : V. Lodha, Adv. for Respondent No. 4

Keshote, J.1. This revision petition under Section 115 CPC is directed against the order dated 20th October 1994 passed by the learned Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Behror in Misc. Case No. 38/94.2. The facts of...

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Metal Box India Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (2000)(117)ELT271TriDel

1. In this appeal filed by the Revenue, the matter relates to the classification of the printed sheets which were used by the customers of the respondents, M/s. Metal Box India Ltd., for the manufacture of...

K. Rami Reddy and Sons Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1985)14ITD108(Hyd.)

1. Since common points are involved these appeals are being disposed of together.2. The assessee-firm was constituted by a partnership deed dated 21-1-1971. The assessee constructed four godowns which were leased out to the Food Corporation...

Smt. Mariam Khatoon and ors. Vs. Husna Ara Begum and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Civil

M.Y. Eqbal, J.1. This Civil revision application is directed against the order dated 15.12.1988 passed by Learned Subordinate Judge IV, Patna in Title Suit No. 375 of 1981 here by the petitioners' petition for amendment of...

Dwarkadas Nathamal Vs. Vimal Alias Yamuna and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 2, Rules 1 and 2, 2(2) and 2(3) - Order 21, Rules 100 and 103; Limitation Act - Sections 2 - Schedule - Article 109

Reported in : AIR1964Bom42; (1963)65BOMLR588; ILR1964Bom68

Advocate for Respondent : D.R. Baxy and ;G.B. Gandhe, Advs.

1. The question which falls for decision in this Second Appeal is whether the suit filed by the appellant to recover mesne profits of the years 1951-52 and 1952-53 is barred under Order 2, Rule 2...