Advanced Search Results

Gleitlager (India) Private Ltd. Vs. Killick Nixon Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 131, 231, 439, 439(2), 448, 449, 451, 456, 457, 457(1), 458, 458A and 552

Reported in : (1976)78BOMLR634; [1977]47CompCas79(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : B.A. Desai, Adv.

Mridul, J.1. This judge's summons had been taken out by the official liquidator of Alcock Ashdown and Company Ltd. (in liquidation), for a direction that Killick Nixon Ltd., respondent to the judge's summons, be ordered and...

SadruddIn Suleman Jhaveri Vs. J.H. Patwardhan and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 31, 245, 254(2), 358 and 366(10); Bombay Commissioners of Divisions Act, 1958 - Sections 3(2) and 3(4); Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 6, 6(1), 6(3), 7, 9, 17(1), 17(3) and 17(4); Bombay Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1958 - Sections 3(2), 4 and 6

Reported in : AIR1965Bom224; (1965)67BOMLR101; ILR1965Bom394; 1965MhLJ290

Advocate for Respondent : Adv. General and ;A.M. Setalvad, Adv., i/b., Little and Co., Attorneys

Kotval, J.(1) In this Special Civil Application there are challenged two Notification under the Land Acquisition Act whereby the land of the petitioner has been taken by the State of Maharashtra the third respondent before us....

Vithalrao Madhaorao Vs. the Collector (Land Acquisition Officer for Na ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyConstitution

Reported in : (1969)71BOMLR262; 1969MhLJ272

Abhyankar, J.1. This judgment will dispose of both these petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution.2. The petitioner Vithalrao in Special Civil Application No. 504 of 19G7 claims to be cultivating Khasra Nos. 51,...

Government of Andhra Pradesh and anr. Vs. Bactchala Balaiah Overruled

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ArbitrationLimitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 17; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 9, Rule 13

Reported in : AIR1985AP52

Advocate for Respondent : Sri. Shankaras Rao

Punnayya, J. 1. The Revision and the C.M.A. arise out of the proceedings of Original Suit No. 124 of 1982. The brief facts leading to the revision and the C.M.A. are as follows: The plaintiff in...

P. Satyanarayana Through His Wife P. Mahalakshmi Vs. I. Babu Rajendra ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : I(1988)ACC510

M. Jagannadha Rao, J.1. This appeal raises questions relating to assessment of non-pecuniary damages in cases such as loss of both eyes and severe head injury resulting in total loss of mental faculties. Today the appel-...

Malakayya and anr. Vs. Avati Buchamma

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 2

Reported in : AIR1973AP208

Advocate for Respondent : K. Pratab Reddy, Adv.

Sriramulu, J.1. This Letters Patent Appeal is directed against the judgment and decree of our learned Brother, Chinnappa Reddy, J. Given in A. S. No. 11 of 1967, whereby the learned Judge dismissed the defendants appeal...

Y. Thirupathi Rao and anr. Vs. Collector of Central Excise, Hyderabad ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 56B, 174 and 176; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 3 and 6; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1983(14)ELT2346(AP)

Advocate for Respondent : K. Subrahmanya Reddy, Standing Counsel for Central Government

ORDER1. In these two writ petitions, the petitioners pray for a declaration that Trade Notice Nos. 135/79 dated 22-6-1979 and 200/79 dated 17-8-1979 are not applicable to them. The petitioners are persons known as Takedars, who...

Edara Pattabi Srirama Vs. Thadikammal Veerabhadra Appala China Rajanna ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 47 and 115 - Order 21, Rules 62 and 66(2)

Reported in : AIR1973AP24

Advocate for Respondent : N.C.V. Ramanujachary, Adv.

Kondaiah, J.1. This appeal by a judgment-debtor gives rise to a short question of procedural law as to whether the executing court is bound to fix an upset price under Order 21, Rule 66 (2) of...

Damacharla Venkata Seshaiah Vs. Damacharla Venkayya and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : PropertyContract

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 22 and 22(2); Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 19

Reported in : AIR1974AP193

Advocate for Respondent : N. Bapi Raju, Adv.

Gopal Rao Ekbote, C.J.1. This appeal is from the judgment of our learned brother M. Krishna Rao, J. given in Appeal Nos. 368 and 443 of 1968 and Memorandum of Cross Objections and 26-3-1971.2. The plaintiff-appellant...

Hind Re-rolling Industries Vs. Apseb and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Supply Act, 1948 - Sections 18, 49, 49(2), 49(3), 59 and 79

Reported in : 2004(6)ALD722

Advocate for Respondent : N. Subba Reddy, Adv. ; for M. Vinobha Devi, Adv. (SC for A.P. TRANSCO) for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 in WP Nos. 8962 of 1995, 13628 of 1996, 907 of 1998, 5694, 7814 and 15353 of 1999 ; for Respondent Nos

ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.1. In all these writ petitions, the petitioners are consumers of electricity supply by the respondents. In some cases, they are existing consumers and others are new consumers, who applied for service connection. The...