Advanced Search Results

Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (1993)IILLJ340All; (1993)1UPLBEC710

Advocate for Respondent : S.B. Pandey and V.K. Tewari, Advs.

D.S. Sinha, J.1. By means of this petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, M/s. Hindustan Aeronautics Limited, the petitioner, seeks to challenge the award dated May 28, 1985 rendered by the Labour Court...

The British India Corporation Ltd., Cawnpore Woollen Mills Branch Thro ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 20A and 25G; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 14, 34 and 38; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946; Army Act, 1960; Air force Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 21; Constitution of India - Article 311; Industrial Law

Reported in : 2006(2)AWC1511; [2006(109)FLR460]

Advocate for Respondent : J.N. Singh, ;R.K. Misra, ;N.K. Srivastava, ;Anil Shukla and ;Neeraj Agrawal, Advs.

Umeshwar Pandey, J.1. Heard Sri V.K. Tewari, learned counsel for the appellants and Sri R.K. Mishra holding brief of Sri J.N. Singh, learned counsel for the respondents.2. This second appeal arises out of the judgment and...

Jafco Traders Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1975]35STC553(All)

Advocate for Respondent : V.K. Tewari, the Standing Counsel

Satish Chandra, J.1. A firm, named the Indian Leather Board Industries, carried on the business of manufacturing leather board in a factory. On 15th January, 1973, it executed a lease of the factory for a period...

Asha Textiles (P.) Ltd. and Another Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Rules, 1952 - Rules 255 and 259

Reported in : 1998(2)AWC1196

Advocate for Respondent : V.K. Tewari, ;Krishna Murari, ;A.K. Shukla, Advs. and ;S.C.

D.S. Sinha and M.L. Singhal, JJ.1. Heard Shrt Rajesh Kumar Agrawal learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, Shri Krishna Murari learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 5, and Shri A. K. Shukla learned standing counsel...

U.P. State Electricity Board and ors. Vs. Iii Addl. Civil Judge and or ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : LimitationCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 9, Rule 13; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5

Reported in : 2005(1)AWC537

Advocate for Respondent : V. Sahai, ;M.B. Lal, ;S.B. Verma, ;C. Prakash, ;V.K. Tewari, Advs. and ;D.N. Tyagi, S.C.

R.B. Misra, J.1. Heard Sri M.M.D. Agarwal. learned counsel for the petitioners, and learned standing counsel for the State-respondents. None appears for the private respondents.2. In this petition prayer has been made to quash the orders...

Mange Ram and anr. Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302

Reported in : 42(1990)DLT273; 1990(19)DRJ155

Jaspal Singh, J. (1) Ranbir Singh was a Head Constable in the Delhi Police. He used to live with his wife Somwati in village Lado Sarai in the house owned by his father-in-law Mange Ram. On...

M.L. Singhal Vs. Pradeep Mathur and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : CivilLimitation

Acts : Fatal Accidents Act, 1855 - Sections 1A; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 85

Reported in : AIR1996Delhi261; ILR1996Delhi106

Usha Mehra, J. (1) It is most unfortunate that the life of plaintiff's wife, Smt. Gayatri Devi had been snatched by the cruel hands, but the question for determination is whose hands were those? Were those...