Advanced Search Results
S. Krishnamurthy Vs. A.R. Rajan
Chennai
Mar-22-1996
CompanyCriminal
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 -Sections 7, 9, 138 and 142
[1996]87CompCas212(Mad); 1996CriLJ3552
V.K. Nachimuthu, Adv.
Karpagavinayagam, J. 1. This revision has been preferred by the petitioner/accused, Krishnamurthy, against the judgment dated March 30, 1992, C.A. No. 36 of 1991 on the file of the learned Second Additional Sessions Judge, Salem, confirming...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Tamil Nadu and anr. Vs. N. Santhanalakshmi
Chennai
Apr-18-1995
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13(1)
II(1995)DMC626
N.R. Chandran, Sr. Counsel for ; V.K. Nachimuthu, Adv.
D. Raju, J.1. A subtle as well as an important and interesting question of law arises for our consideration in the above appeal. The question is as to whether a divorced woman can be said to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMidhuna Nathan and Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Others
Chennai
Sep-28-1995
Constitution
Constituition of India - Articles 14, 15 and 226; Mysore Medical Colleges (Selection for Admission) Rules, 1970 - Rules 4 and 5
AIR1996Mad178
R. Krishnamoorthy Adv. General assisted by ;D. Murugesan, Special Govt. Pleader (Education), ;E.M. Sundersana Nachiyappan, ;P. Kannan, ;R. Raghunathan, ;B.S. Gnanadesikan,;V.K. Nachimuthu, Advs. ;G. M
ORDERSrinivasan, J. A. INTRODUCTION 1. These five writ petitions arc challenging the selection of candidates for. the M.B.B.S., Course under the category of seats reserved for Eminent Sportsmen. The first of the petitions i.e., W.P. No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
C. R. Subramaniam Vs. N. Vasudevan
Chennai
Mar-20-1998
Tenancy
Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent) Control Act, 1960 -- Sections 10 (3) and 25; West Bengal Tenancy Act, 1956 -- Sections 10 (3), 13 (1); Andhra Pradesh Rent Control Act-- Sections 10 (3)
1998(2)CTC211
Mr. V. K. Nachimuthu, Adv.
ORDER1. Tenant in R.C.OLP. No.8 of 1989, on the file of Rent Controller (District Munsif), Erode, is the revision petitioner.2. Respondent, landlord of the building, filed the petition for eviction on the ground that he needs...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPownammal and 2 ors. Vs. Janakiammal
Chennai
Mar-19-1996
Family
Hindu Law
II(1996)DMC526; (1996)IIMLJ509
V.K. Nachimuthu, Adv.
Raju, J.1. The above Second Appeal has been filed by the defendants in O.S. No. 645 of 1979 on the file of the District Munsif's Court at Thirupathur, North Arcot District, against the judgment and decree...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDuraisamy, Vs. N. Ethirajulu,
Chennai
Nov-25-2002
PropertyFamily
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 96
(2003)1MLJ369
S. Parthasarathy, Adv. ;V.K. Nachimuthu, Adv. for RR1 and 2 and ;M.V. Venkataseshan, Adv. for ;S.V. Ramesh, Adv. for RR3 to 5
M. Chockalingam, J.1. Defendants 1 to 3 in O.S. No. 40 of 1981 and plaintiffs in O.S. No. 1286 of 1980 are the appellants herein.2. Both the appeals have been filed against the common judgment and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNational Insurance Company Limited Vs. Samiyathal, Parameswari, Dhanab ...
Chennai
Dec-31-2002
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 173
(2003)1MLJ319
V.K. Nachimuthu, Adv. for R-1 to R-4 and ;Kaithaimalai Kumaran, Adv. for A.K. Kumarasamy, Adv. for R-6
P. Sathasivam, J.1. Aggrieved by the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Principal Subordinate Judge), Erode, dated 31-01-1996 made in M.C.O.P. No. 336 of 1992, National Insurance Company Limited, Bhavani has preferred the above appeal.2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›