Advanced Search Results

Rajesh Kr. Jain vs.state

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : February 20th, 2017 CRL.A. No.570/2000 RAJESH KR. JAIN ..... Appellant Through Mr.Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Vivek Sharma, Adv. & Mr.Neeraj...

Pradeep Kumar Sharma and anr. Vs. Smt. Shanta Sharma @ Shanti and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. d January, 2013 % + CS(OS) No.1920/2011 & IA No.20633/2012 (of the defendants no. 1 to 3 under Order 9 R-7 and Order 8...

Mrs. Asha @ Aysha Siddiqui Vs. Sh. K.C. Vohra and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. d March, 2013 % + CS(OS) No.3312/2011 MRS. ASHA @ AYSHA SIDDIQUI ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. K.R. Chawla & Mr. V.K. Malik, Advs. Versus...

Veerendra Chopra and anr. Vs. the State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 2(1AA), 4, 20, 20A and 25; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 155(2) and 155(4); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 425

Reported in : 132(2006)DLT115

Advocate for Respondent : V.K. Malik, Adv.

Badar Durrez Ahmed, J.1. The learned Counsel for the petitioners submitted that the order on charge as well as the charges framed on 03.04.2003 and 09.04.2003 respectively require to be set aside. He submitted that the...

Dhanpal Singh Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 279 and 304A

Reported in : 2004CriLJ2724; 111(2004)DLT464; 2004(74)DRJ506

Advocate for Respondent : V.K. Malik, Adv.

R.S. Sodhi, J.1. This revision petition is directed against the judgment and order dated 18.04.2001 of the learned Additional Sessions Judge in Crl.A.65/2000, upholding the order of conviction of the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, whereby...

Whitefield International Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : CriminalBanking

Acts : Banking Law

Reported in : 97(2002)DLT180

Advocate for Respondent : V.K. Malik, Adv.; Reema Khorana, Adv.

ORDER 1. It is submitted by learned Counsel for petitioner that it would be proper andin the interest of justice if the amount standing in the credit of the petitioner'saccount as of date after making the...

Bhagwan Panda Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 306

Reported in : 2001VAD(Delhi)414; 92(2001)DLT182; 2001(59)DRJ236

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. V.K. Malik, Adv.

R.S. Sodhi, J 1. This criminal revision is directed against the judgment and order dated 9.3.2001 of the learned Additional Sessions Judge whereby the learned Judge found sufficient material to frame charge under Section 306 IPC....

Raj Kumar Kapoor Vs. D.C. Sharma

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138

Reported in : 112(2004)DLT68

Advocate for Respondent : V.K. Malik, Adv.

R.S. Sodhi, J.1. This petition is directed against the order dated 31st July, 2003 of the Additional Sessions Judge in CC No. 327/2003, whereby the learned Judge while holding the petitioner guilty under Section 138 of...

Brahm Prakash Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 356 and 379

Reported in : 112(2004)DLT812

Advocate for Respondent : V.K. Malik, Adv.

R.S. Sodhi, J.1. This revision petition is directed against the judgment and order dated 30.7.2003 of the learned Additional Sessions Judge in Crl. A. No. 28/ 2002 and Crl. A. 31/2002 arising out of the order...

Om Prakash Miglani and anr. Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 209, 397, 401 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 186, 333 and 353

Reported in : 113(2004)DLT337

Advocate for Respondent : V.K. Malik, Adv.

ORDERS.K. Agarwal, J. Crl. Revision Petition 442 of 2004 & Crl. M. 6448 & 6450 of 2004:1. By this petition under Sections 397/401 read with Section 482, Cr.P.C petitioner is challenging the order dated 15.12.2003, passed...