Advanced Search Results

Webbing and Belting Factory (P.) Ltd., Ghaziabad Vs. Vinod Kumar and O ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Indian Easements Act, 1882 - Sections 4; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 1999(4)AWC3127

Advocate for Respondent : V.K. Jaiswal, Adv.

D. K. Seth. J. 1. Leave is granted to convert the petition into one under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.2. The order dated 17th August,, 1999 passed by the learned Additional District XVth Court....

State of U.P. Vs. Rajendra Singh Chaudhary, Advocate

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 11, 17 and 19

Reported in : 2000CriLJ919; (1999)3UPLBEC2054

Advocate for Respondent : V.K. Jaiswal, ;Revindra Nath Rai and ;V.C. Misra, Advs.

Ravi S. Dhavan and B. Dikshit, JJ.1. The District Judge, Ghaziabad, has made a reference to the High Court on the basis of the report submitted by A. K. Singh Xth Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghaziabad,...

Shiv Raj and Others Vs. Addl. Collector (Supplies), Ghaziabad and Othe ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 117, 122B, 122B(4F), 132, 194 and 195; Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1901 - Sections 14

Reported in : 1998(1)AWC730

Advocate for Respondent : S.C. and ;V.K. Jaiswal, Adv.

Sudhir Narain, J.1. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 25.11.1997 passed by the Additional Collector, respondent No. 1, allowing the revision filed by respondent Nos. 3 and 4.2. The facts, in brief, are...

Chunmun Vs. District, Magistrate, Sonbhadra and Another

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 12(1), 95(1) and 110; Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Rules, 1947 - Rules 47 and 47A; Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Removal of Pradhan, Up-Pradhans and Members) Enquiry Rules, 1997 - Rules 3, 3(1), (2), (3), (5) and (6), 4, 4(1), 5, 7 and 8; Constitution of India - Articles 4(2) and 243B, C, G and H; Constitution of India (Seventy-third Amendment) Act, 1992

Reported in : 1998(3)AWC1892; (1998)3UPLBEC2061

Advocate for Respondent : S.C. and ;Ran Vijay Singh, Adv.

S.R. Singh, J.1. Impugned herein is the order dated 29.5.1998 passed by the District Magistrate. Sonbhadra in purported exercise of powers under the proviso to clause (g) of sub-section (1) of Section (95) of the U....

Anima Gupta Vs. Tarun Kumar Gupta

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Family

Acts : Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 - Sections 9

Reported in : AIR2003All76

Advocate for Respondent : Usha Kiran, Adv.

ORDERB.K. Rathi, J.1. The opposite party moved an application under Section 25 of Guardians & Wards Act read with Section 6 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act for appointment of guardian and custody of minor...

Narendra Singh Alias Natey Singh and anr. Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161

Reported in : 2003CriLJ205

Advocate for Respondent : Virendra Singh, A.G.A.

S.K. Agarwal, J.1. These two criminal appeals, being Criminal Appeal No. 829 of 1996 (filed on behalf of Bansh Bahadur Singh and Jat Pratap Singh alias Ram Pratap Singh) and Criminal Appeal No. 776 of 1996...

Panch Lal Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Election

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 12C; Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Election of Members, Pradhan and Up Pradhan) Rules, 1994 - Rules 88, 91, 91(2) and 93

Reported in : 2005(1)AWC853

Advocate for Respondent : Vidya Sagar, S.C.

Ashok Bhushan, J.1. Heard Sri Ashok Khare senior advocate assisted by Sri V, K. Jaiswal advocate for the petitioner and Sri Vidya Sagar appearing for the contesting respondent No. 6.2. By this writ petition the petitioner...

M/S. Bombay Trading Co. Vs. M/S. Jai Santoshi Maa Enterprises

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

By this Summons for Judgment, the Plaintiff seeks that judgment be entered for the Plaintiff in this suit against the Defendant for Rs.11,32,569.54 and for interest and costs. 2. The suit is based on an invoice...

M/S. Bombay Trading Co. Vs. M/S. Jai Santoshi Maa Enterprises

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

By this Summons for Judgment, the Plaintiff seeks that judgment be entered for the Plaintiff in this suit against the Defendant for Rs.11,32,569.54 and for interest and costs. 2. The suit is based on an invoice...

Hindi Sahitya Sammelan Prayag, Through Its Prabandh Mantri Sri Vibhuti ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 311 and 311(2); Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946; Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 6(2A) and 11A

Reported in : 2006(3)AWC2303

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Srivastava, ;B.N. Singh and ;V.K. Jaiswal, Advs.

Rakesh Tiwari, J.1. Review, of my judgment dated 4.1.2005 has been sought by the respondent-workman. Sri B.N. Singh appearing for the respondent-workman has urged that there is error apparent on the face of record in the...