Advanced Search Results

Mohd. Zakir HusaIn Ansari Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : C.S.C. Adv

1.The writ petition is directed against the order dated 23.10.2008 passed by respondent no. 2, Superintending Engineer, Minor Irrigation, Bareilly Circle, rejecting representation of petitioner for giving appointment on the post of Urdu Translator. 2.With consent...

Dr. Sudhakar Malviya and Others Vs. Banaras Hindu University and Other ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 23 and 39; Banaras Hindu University Act, 1915 - Sections 2

Reported in : 1998(4)AWC266; (1998)3UPLBEC1713

Advocate for Respondent : Dinesh Kacker, Adv.

R.K. Mahajan, J.1. This writ petition raises interesting question as the petitioner's grievance is that they were though recruited as Research Assistants in different branches of the University on various dates between 1963 and 1982 as...

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Smt. Harnandi Devi

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act - Sections 331; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 14, Rule 1, 1(2) and 1(3)

Reported in : 2006(3)AWC2216

Advocate for Respondent : W.H. Khan, ;N.K. Sharma, ;Raj Kumar Jain, ;Pankaj Mithal, ;Rahul Jain, ;Madan Mohan and ;S.K. Tyagi, Advs.

Prakash Krishna, J.1. These two revisions were heard together and are being disposed of by a common Judgment. This is plaintiffs revision of ordinal Suit No. 52 of 1998 in which the opposite party is the...

Noor Mohd. Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 364A; Constitution of India - Articles 4, 5 and 6

Reported in : 2006(92)DRJ42

Advocate for Respondent : Mukta Gupta and ; Rajdipa Behura, Advs. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3, ;Shivanand and ;

Manmohan Sarin, J.1. Petitioner Noor Mohd. seeks a writ of habeas corpus for production of Farooque, a child, who was being reared by him. Farooque had been taken away from his custody by respondent No. 7...

Veer Singh Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Sanjiv Khanna, J. 1. Veer Singh by the impugned judgment dated 18th January, 2000 has been convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC, for short) for having committed murder of Praveen Kumar...

Amrit Lal Batra Vs. Divakar Pandey and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 449 and 500; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 107 and 151

Reported in : 121(2005)DLT160; 2005(81)DRJ353

Advocate for Respondent : I.P.S. Raghuvanshi, Adv. for the Respondent No.1

Manju Goel, J.1. The petition seeks quashing of the complaint u/s 500 of the Indian Penal Code and the order dated 23.4.2001 by which petitioner along with others have been summoned to stand trial for an...

R.P. Sethi Vs. Commissioner of Customs, New

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (2002)(140)ELT482TriDel

1. The brief facts of the case are as follows :- Officers of Customs (Air Cargo Preventive Unit, IGI Airport, New Delhi) intercepted a Ma-ruti Car (Regn. No. DL-4CG 1513) on 23-10-97 outside the exit gate...

Narendra Singh ? Pandit Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Criminal

Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 1324 of 2005 with Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 1163 of 2005 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 1324 of 2005 with Criminal Appeal (DB) No....

Dhirendra Singh ? Pappu Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Criminal

Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 1324 of 2005 with Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 1163 of 2005 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 1324 of 2005 with Criminal Appeal (DB) No....

Prem Chandra JaIn Vs. Collector, Firozabad and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Uttar Pradesh Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1972 - Sections 3; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985; Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rule 3; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 98; Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1901 - Sections 3(5) and 183; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 287A; Arbitration Act, 1940; Income-tax Act, 1962; Uttar Pradesh Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Act, 1953 - Sections 17(4)

Reported in : 1998(3)AWC1950

Advocate for Respondent : V.K. Goyal, Adv.

R.R.K. Trivedi, J.1. It appears that the maintainability of this bunch of writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was doubted by one of the Hon'ble Judges constituting the Bench. Consequently, the arguments...