Advanced Search Results

Kali Ram (Sri) Vs. Mirza Waker Ali and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Transfer of Property Act - Sections 106; Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 3, 3(1), 7, 20, 20(4) and 30; Evidence Act - Sections 114; General Clauses Act - Sections 27; Post Office Act - Sections 14; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Indian Post Office Rules - Rules 62, 63 and 64(1)

Reported in : 2005(1)ARC530

Advocate for Respondent : V.K. Bisht, Sr. Adv. assisted by; Amberish Chatterji, Adv.

Rajesh Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri B.C. Pandey, Sr. Advocate assisted by Sri Naresh Pant, Counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.K. Bisht, Sr. Advocate assisted by Sri Amberish Chatterji, Counsel for the respondents.2. By the present...

Ahmad Sayeed Vs. District Judge and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 21 and 21(1); Central Provinces and Berar Letting of Houses and Rent Control Order, 1949; Contract Act - Sections 10 and 23; Constitution of India - Article 226 and 227; Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Rules, 1972 - Rule 16 and 16(2)

Reported in : 2005(1)ARC730

Advocate for Respondent : V.K. Bisht, Sr. Adv. assisted by; Seema Sirohi, Adv.

Rajesh Tandon, J.1. Heard Mr. Sharad Sharma, Counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.K. Bisht, Sr. Advocate assisted by Ms. Seema Sirohi, Counsel for the respondents.By the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a...

Dwarka Trading Corpn. Vs. Cheema Paper Mills (P) Ltd.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR2007Utr83

Advocate for Respondent : Sri. Chandra-mauli, Sri. Suresh Bhatt

ORDERRajesh Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri V.K. Bisht, Sr. Advocate assisted by Sri Sushil Vashisth, counsel for the revisionist and Sri Chandra-mauli and Sri Suresh Bhatt, counsel for the respondent.2. By the present civil revision filed under...

Rajesh Kumar Saxena Vs. Smt. Nidhi Saxena

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Family

Acts : Family Courts Act, 1984 - Sections 9; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 24

Reported in : II(1995)DMC308

Advocate for Respondent : V.K. Bisht, Adv.

S.C. Mohapatra, J.1. This is an appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act against the order refusing the application of the husband for dissolution of the marriage under Hindu Marriage Act. There is no...

Commissioner of Income-tax and anr. Vs. Hyundai Heavy Industries Co. L ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 17, 17(2) and 201(1A)

Reported in : (2004)189CTR(Uttranchal)91; [2003]264ITR328(Uttaranchal)

Advocate for Respondent : O.P. Sapra, Adv., i/b. V.K. Bisht, Adv.

S.H. Kapadia, C.J. 1. This group of appeals raises a common question of law and fact. Hence, the three appeals are decided by this common judgment.2. For the sake of convenience, the facts in Income-tax Appeal...

P.C. Sharma and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR2006Utr4

Advocate for Respondent : V.K. Bisht, Sr. Counsel

V.S. Sirpurkar, C.J. 1. Heard Sri Rajendra Dobhal, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned standing counsel for the respondents.2. This writ petition has a chequered history. Initially what is being challenged is the order dated...

J Durai Murugan vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 390/2017 J DURAI MURUGAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Adv. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Manish Mohan, CGSC for UOI. UNION OF INDIA &...