Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: v h dighe · Page 1 of about 34 results (0.033 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 28 2005

Hariharrao Vishwanathrao Bhosikar Vs. Datta Anandrao Pawar and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-28-2005

Subject : Election

Acts : Maharashtra Local Authority Members (Disqualification) Act, 1987 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 4, 5, 7 and 9; Representation of the People Act; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Constitution (fifty second Amendment) Act, 1985; Maharashtra Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samities Act, 1961 - Sections 57(1); Maharashtra Municipalities Act; Maharashtra Local Authority Members Disqualification Rules, 1987 - Rules 2, 3, 3(5), 5, 6, 6(3), 6(4), 7, 7(4) and 8 ; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10; Maharashtra Local Authority Members' Disqualification (Amendment) Rules, 1997

Reported in : 2006(1)ALLMR702; 2005(4)MhLj211

Advocate for Respondent : Prakash B. Patil, Adv., ;V.H. Dighe, ;S.S. Autade, ;M.V. Deshpande, ;R.R. Mane and ;V.H. Dighe, AGPs

A.B. Naik, J.1. All the four writ petitions involve common question of law, though filed by different petitioners, can be disposed of by the this common judgment. All the petitions are filed under Articles 226 and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 10 2007

Bhagwanrao S/O. Vishwanath Vyawhare and anr. Vs. Sau. Sunita W/O. Gopi ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-10-2007

Subject : Service

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 41, Rule 27 - Order 43, Rule 27; Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981 - Rules 36, 36(1), 36(2), 37 and 38; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2008(1)ALLMR68; 2007(6)BomCR275; 2008(1)MhLj417

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Jadhavar, Adv. for the Respondent No. 1 and; V.H. Dighe, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for Respondent No. 2

R.M. Savant, J.1. Rule, with the consent of the parties made returnable forthwith and heard. 2. The short question that arises for consideration in this writ petition filed under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 25 2007

Naresh S/O Baliram Sonwane Vs. Kishor S/O Kashinath Patil and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-25-2007

Subject : Election

Acts : Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 - Sections 10, 11 and 12; Evidence Act - Sections 34, 35, 73 and 74; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2007(6)ALLMR759; 2007(6)MhLj801

Advocate for Respondent : K.C. Sant, Adv. for respondent Nos. 1 to 4, ;V.H. Dighe, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for respondent Nos. 5 to 7 and ;P.R. Patil, Adv. for respondent No. 8

R.M. Savant, J.1. Rule, made returnable forthwith and with the consent of parties, heard.2. This petition impugns the order dated 12-3-2007 passed by the IInd Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Jalgaon in Reference No. 1 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 09 2005

Sitabai Kerba Deotarse and ors. Vs. Anil Sahebrao Deotarse and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-09-2005

Subject : Property

Acts : Specific Relief Act - Sections 39 and 39(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rules 1, 2, 2A and 11;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rules 1, 2, 2A and 11

Reported in : 2006(5)BomCR833; 2006(2)MhLj65

Advocate for Respondent : P.F. Patni, Adv. for respondent No. 1 and ;V.H. Dighe, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 5 to 7

S.B. Deshmukh, J.1. Heard Mr. Barhate, learned Counsel for the petitioners; Mr. P. F. Patni, learned Counsel for respondent No. 1 and Mr. V. H. Dighe, learned AGP for respondent Nos. 5 to 7, respondent Nos....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 29 2006

Shantaram Damodar Shukla and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-29-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120(B), 409 and 477; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 13(1), 13(2), 19 and 19(3); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Criminal Law Amendment Ordinance, 1994

Reported in : 2006CriLJ3100

Advocate for Respondent : V.H. Dighe, APP for No. 1 and ;D.S. Bagul, Adv. for No. 2

ORDERS.B. Deshmukh, J.1. Heard learned Counsel Mr. B. R. Warma for the petitioners, learned A.P.P. Mr. V.H. Dighe, for respondent No. 1 and learned Counsel Mr. D. S. Bagul, who appears for respondent No. 2.2. Facts...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 16 1993

Sawaleram Sakharam Datir and ors. Vs. Karbhari Ahilaji Choudhari and o ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-16-1993

Subject : Election

Acts : Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 73C(3) and 152A(2)

Reported in : 1993(3)BomCR700

Advocate for Respondent : P.R. Deshmukh, Adv. for respondent Nos. 1, 2, 4 to 11 and 13 to 17, ;V.H. Dighe, Adv. for respondent Nos. 3 and 12, ;R.N. Dhorde, Adv. for respondent No. 18, ;P.R. Malpani, Adv, for respondent No. 19

N.P. Chapalgaonker, J.1. Elections to elect Directors of respondent No. 19 - Karkhana was held on 10th May, 1989. Results were announced two days thereafter and respondent Nos. 1 to 18 were elected as Director of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 12 2009

Lalji S/O Bansanarayan Choubey Vs. Jiyalal Chavan and the State of Mah ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-12-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 118, 138 and 139; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 357(3)

Reported in : 2009(2)MhLj565

Advocate for Respondent : V.H. Dighe, A.P.P. for Respondent No. 2

V.R. Kingaonkar, J.1. Challenge in this appeal is to judgement of acquittal rendered by learned Judicial Magistrate (F.C.), in Summary Criminal Case No. 1525/1997 whereby and whereunder respondent No. 1 - Jiyalal came to be acquitted...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 26 2009

Abhiman S/O Baburao Gaikwad Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-26-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 113A and 113B; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 306 and 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 174

Reported in : 2009(4)BomLR1381

Advocate for Respondent : V.H. Dighe, A.P.P.

V.R. Kingaonkar, J.1. Challenge in this appeal is to judgment rendered by Additional Sessions Judge, Ambejogai, in Sessions case No. 44/1991 whereby the appellant has been convicted for offence punishable under Sections 498-A and 306 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 2016

Akole Taluka Education Society and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-19-2016

Subject : Education

Common Judgment: (M.S. Sonak, J.) 1. Rule in each of the petitions. With the consent of and at the request of the learned counsel for the parties, Rule is disposed of finally. 2. The learned counsel...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 12 2006

State of Maharashtra and anr. Vs. Baliram Girdhar Patil

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-12-2006

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4(1), 11, 15, 18, 23(1A), 23(2), 28, 30(1) and 34; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984 - Sections 30(1)

Reported in : 2006(6)MhLj82

Advocate for Respondent : V.T. Choudhary, Adv.

S.B. Deshmukh, J.1. These First Appeals arise out of two common judgments delivered by the learned Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Jalgaon, in two groups of Land Acquisition References. First group was consisting of Land Acquisition...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial