Advanced Search Results
Anil Shripatrao Badge Vs. Sundrabai Mahada Mali Since Deceased Through ...
Mumbai
Apr-22-1999
TenancyProperty
Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 - Sections 38, 38-A and 50-B; Constitution of India - Article 227
2000(1)BomCR893
V.G. Mete, Adv., ;Smt. Geeta Deshpande, A.G.P.
ORDERR.G. Deshpande, J.1. Heard Shri S.S. Choudhary, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Shri V.G. Mete, Advocate for the respondent No. 1 and Smt. Geeta Deshpande, Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent No. 3. The respondent No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKhajabhai S/O. Abdula Sahab Lukade and ors. Vs. Mohammed Ishaq S/O. Ab ...
Mumbai
Jul-12-1991
Civil
Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 - Sections 247(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 54 - Order 26, Rule 13
1991(3)BomCR58
Namrata Ranade, Holding and ;S.A. Deshmukh, Adv. for respondent No. 1, ;S.K. Barlota, Asst. Govt. Pleader for respondent Nos. 4 to 8
N.P. Chapalgaonker, J.1. A decree for partition passed in Regular Civil Suit No. 144/1981 and sought to be executed in Regular Darkhast No. 14/1983 was sent to the Collector, Osmanabad, for execution under the provisions of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDada Bhagwan Shinde and Aba Bhagwan Shinde Vs. Tulsabai W/O Narayan Sh ...
Mumbai
Dec-10-2007
Property
Hindu Women's Right to Property Act, 1937 - Sections 3(3) and 4; President of India to Hyderabad (Application of Central Acts) Act, 1952 - Sections 1(3) and 2; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 14, 14(1) and 14(2); Hindu Law of Inheritance (Amendment) Act, 1929; Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 - Sections 157; Hindu Law; Constitution of India
2008(5)ALLMR776; 2008(2)BomCR159; (2008)110BOMLR156; 2008(3)MhLj475
S.Y. Mahajan, Adv. for Respondent No. 2
S.B. Deshmukh, J.1. This appeal challenges the judgment and decree passed by the learned District Judge in Regular Civil Appeal No. 138 of 1981 dated 20th December, 1986. The present Appellants are the plaintiffs in Regular...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
KutbuddIn RiyazuddIn Shaikh Vs. Subhash Rangnath Wadane
Mumbai
Nov-28-1997
Contract
Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 22; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17
1998(3)ALLMR19; 1998(2)BomCR818
V.G. Mete, Adv.
ORDERN.P. Chapalgaonker, J.1. In a suit for specific performance, prayer for the alternate relief of refund of consideration in the event the performance is refused was not made. Subsequent application filed by the defendant to amend...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRangrao S/O Shankarrao Deceased Through L.Rs and Others Vs. Pandharina ...
Mumbai
Dec-08-1998
Property
Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 - Sections 47 and 99-A; Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 - Sections 8; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 2; Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Amending) Act, 1965; Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holding) Act, 1975
1999(3)ALLMR15; 1999(4)BomCR180
S.K. Kadam, A.G.P. and ;V.G. Mete, Adv.
ORDERS.B. Mhase, J. 1. The petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against the judgment of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal inAppeal No. 5/A/84- Parbhani, decided on 17-12-1986. 2. The brief facts which...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBabasaheb Dnyanoba Ritpure and ors. Vs. Dagdu S/O Gina Ritpure and ors ...
Mumbai
Sep-22-2000
Tenancy
Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 - Sections 38E
2001(2)ALLMR146; 2001(3)BomCR18
V.G. Mete, Adv. in W.P. No. 920/1984 for Respondent No. 1 and in W.P. No. 1257/1988, for Respondent No. 3, ;S.G. Mantri, Adv. in W.P. No. 920/1984, for Respondent No. 2, ;R.R. Jethalia, Adv. in W.P.
R.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.1. Since a common question of law and facts arise in both these petitions, they were heard and are being disposed of together by this common judgment.2. In Writ Petition No. 920/1984, the order...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGanesh Ginning and Pressing Co. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.
Mumbai
Jul-15-2005
PropertyCivil
Maharashtra Land Revenue Code - Sections 41 to 54A and 257
AIR2005Bom324; 2005(5)BomCR69; 2005(4)MhLj263
Dilip Bankar Patil, A.G.P. for Nos. 1 and 2 and ;V.G. Mete, Adv. for No. 3
S.P. Kukday, J.1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith with consent of the parties. Heard both the sides. Perused the records.2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the petitioner company is engaged in the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›