Advanced Search Results

Powai Housing Development Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. Jayanti Satyanaraya ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 1, Rule 3 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2, - Order 40, Rule 1; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act - Sections 346; U.L.C.R. Act - Sections 20

Reported in : 1998(2)BomCR780

Advocate for Respondent : V.C. Kotwal, ;S.J. Khera, Advs., ;M.M. Vashi, Adv., i/by M.P. Vashi & Associates, ;M.M. Desai, Adv., i/by ;Desai & Des and ;D.L. Amin, Adv., i/by ;Mulla & Mulla & Craigie Blun

ORDER1. This Cross Objection is filed against the order dated 4th April, 1997 passed by the learned Single Judge in Notice of Motion No. 690 of 1996. It has been contended by the appellants that, without...

Hemendra Rasiklal Ghia Vs. Subodh Mody

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 4, 5, 21, 33, 36, 66, 91, 92, 93 and 123; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 12; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999 - Sections 27; Stamp Act - Sections 36; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 89 - Order 7, Rule 14 - Order 8, Rules 1, 1A, 6G and 8A - Order 12, Rule 2 and 2A - Order 13, Rules 1, 3, 4, 4(1) and 6 - Order 18, Rules 2(4), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 4(3), 4(4), 4(5), 4(6), 4(7), 4(8), 17A, 18 and 19 - Order 19, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 26, Rules 4A, 16, 16A, 17 and 18; Constitution of India - Article 21; Bombay High Court (Appellate Side) Rules - Rule 7

Reported in : 2008(6)ALLMR352; 2008(6)MhLj886

Advocate for Respondent : N.Y. Gupte, Adv. in W.P. No. 623 of 2005, ;S.G. Aney, Sr. Counsel and ;S.V. Mhatre, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 3 in W.P. No. 1902 of 2005, ;R.M. Patne, A.G.P. for Respondent No. 4 in W.P. No. 1902

Vijay C. Daga, J.1. The question presented in these cases require us to resolve two conflicting lines of precedents on the one hand, as the Court stress that 'it is necessary for Court to decide about...

Jimmy Abraham Thomas and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 3; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226 and 266; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 1, Rule 8; Dentists Act, 1948 - Sections 10A and 10B(3); Indian Medical Councils Act, 1956 - Sections 10A, 10A(1), 10A(2), 10A(7), 10B, 10B(1), 10C, 20 and 33; Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970 - Sections 3; Medical Council (Amendment) Act, 1993

Reported in : 2002(1)ALLMR1; 2002(3)BomCR219

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Jamdar, Mrs. Samant

H. L. Gokhale, J.1. All the writ petitions in Group (A) above invoking Article 226 of the Constitution of India raise common questions with respect to the correctness and legality of the Maharashtra Health Sciences Common...

M.V. sea Success I Vs. Liverpool and London Steamship Protection and I ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Admiralty Courts Act, 1861 - Sections 5; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 7, Rule 11

Reported in : 2002(2)BomCR537

Advocate for Respondent : P.S. Pratap, Adv. in Appl. No. 226/2001 in Notice of Motion No. 2455/2000 in Admiralty Suit No. 32/2000, for respondent No. 1 and ;Rahul Narichania, Adv., i/b., Mulla & Mulla in Appl. No. 739/2000

R.M. Lodha, J.1. The learned Single Judge while dismissing Notice of Motion No. 2455/2000 with regard to prayer (a) taken out by the Vessel m.v. 'Sea Success I' and her owners S.S. Shipping Corporation Inc. in...

Owners Partners Vessel Shbdharti Vs. Seahorse Marine Engineering Pltd

Court : Chennai

Subject : Arbitration

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:29. 01/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VINOD K.SHARMA A.No.4265 of 2012 in C.S.No.504 of 2012 Owners Partners Vessel SHBDharti vs. Seahorse Marine Engineering PLtd FOR PETITIONER : Krishna...

Great Pacific Navigation (Holdings) Corporation Limited Vs. M.V. Tongl ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Section 9- A - Order 7 Rule 11; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9, 11(6); Companies Act, 1956

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Pradeep Sancheti; Mr.Rahul Narichania; Ms. Purnima Singh; Ms.Pooja Kapadia; Ms.Aarti Shah, Advs.

1. This it the defendant's Notice of Motion to have an order of arrest dated 9th December, 2010, of the defendant-vessel, vacated and for an order directing the plaintiffs to pay damages towards losses suffered due...

Lufeng Shipping Co. Ltd. and Another Vs. M.V. Rainbow Ace and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

1. The present Notice of Motion is taken out by the Applicant – Rainbow Ace Shipping S.A. Panama, Owner of Defendant No.1 Vessel M.V. Rainbow Ace for setting aside the order of arrest of Defendant No....

A.R. Bhujbal and Others Vs. M/S. Sam Hiring Co. and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 - Sections 2(7), 41, 74, 76, 82, 83, 88(3), 92, 93 and 103; Constitution of India - Article 226; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act;

Reported in : AIR1994Bom297; 1994(2)BomCR456; (1994)96BOMLR424; 1994(1)MhLj766

Advocate for Respondent : V.C. Kotwal, ;Mukund Madekar, ;B.B. Madekar, ;A.T. Marques and;N.V. Sanglikar, Advs.

ORDERPendse, J.1. Haji Abdulla Noor Mohammad Machiswala Charitable Trust was the owner of two plots of land situated at D'Lima Street, 'E' Ward, of Mazgaon Division. On the picot of land admeasuring approximately 162.21 sq. meters,...

N.D. Georgopoulos Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Gen. Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 7 and 9; Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 2, 2(13), 2(28), 4(2), 7, 8, 9, 34, 46 and 75; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4(2), 5, 14 and 15

Reported in : [1976]37STC187(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : V.C. Kotwal, Adv.

Madon, J. 1. These are two references under section 34(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Bombay Act'), in which a common question of law is involved. These references first...

Gorai Machhimar Sahakari Sanstha Limited and Noel Vincent Kinny of Mum ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 114; Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 - Sections 20(2), 37(2), 250, 251, 257 and 258; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80 and 96; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR3435

Advocate for Respondent : K.R. Belosay, "A" Panel Counsel, for Respondent No. 1, ;V.C. Kotwal, Sr. Counsel and ;Prakash Shah, Adv., i/b., DSK Legal for Respondent No. 3

P.B. Majmudar, J.1. By way of this petition, the petitioners, Gorai Machhimar Sahakari Sanstha Limited and its President, have challenged the order passed by respondent No. 2 dated 29th April, 1997, a copy of which is...