Advanced Search Results

Vijayadevi Navalkishore Bhartia and anr. Vs. Land Acquisition Officer ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : PropertyConstitution

Acts : Land Acquisition Act - Sections 4, 9, 11, 11(1), 15(1) and 15A

Reported in : 2003(3)ALLMR(SC)297; 2003(2)AWC1425(SC); (2003)3CALLT1(SC); RLW2003(3)SC407; 2003(3)SCALE21; (2003)5SCC83; 2003(2)LC982(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : V.B. Joshi, ; Naresh Kumar and ; V.N. Raghupathy, Advs.

ORDER1. Heard learned counsel for the parties2. Leave granted.3. The appellants are the owners of the land situated in Akola district, Maharashtra. The State Government issued a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act...

Junjaram Vs. Bhaurao and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : TenancyProperty

Acts : Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958 - Sections 10, 19(2), 125 and 132

Reported in : 1996IIIAD(SC)86; AIR1996SC1885; JT1996(3)SC55; 1996(2)SCALE597; (1996)8SCC181; [1996]2SCR973

Advocate for Respondent : V.B. Joshi and ; Umesh Bhagwat, Advs.

1. Abatement set aside. Substitution allowed. 2. Delay condoned.3. This appeal by special leave arises from the order of the High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench dated December 4, 1980 in Writ Petition No. 1986/74 filled...

Ramprasad Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32, 155 and 157; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 151, 162 and 164

Reported in : AIR1999SC1969; 1999CriLJ2889; 1999(3)Crimes96(SC); JT1999(4)SC74; 1999(3)SCALE623; (1999)5SCC30; 1999(Supp)SCC30; [1999]3SCR519

Advocate for Respondent : V.B. Joshi and ; D.M. Nargolkar, Advs.

K.T. Thomas, J. 1. These appeals relate to a case of mercenary killing. Though the principal target of the killers was one Ram Kishore Somani @ Ramu they could kill only his younger brother Ashok Somani,...

Moreshwar Balkrishna Pandare and ors. Vs. Vithal Vyanku Chavan and ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : PropertyTenancy

Acts : Bombay Tenancy & Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 14, 31, 29, 32, 33C,43(1B) and 88C; Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 - Sections 29

Reported in : AIR2001SC2211; 2001(3)ALLMR(SC)499; JT2001(Suppl1)SC49; 2001(4)SCALE181; (2001)5SCC551; [2001]3SCR712

Advocate for Respondent : V.B. Joshi and ; Sandeep Singh Tiwari, Advs.

Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J. 1. This appeal, by special leave, is from the judgment and order of the High Court of judicature at Bombay, allowing. Writ Petition No. 1560 of 1981, filed by the respondents,...

Damodaran Pillai and ors. Vs. South Indian Bank Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5 and 32; Limitation Act, 1908; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 97 and 151 - Order 21, Rules 23(1), 41, 105, 105(2), 105(3), 105(4), 106, 106(1) and 106(3); Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - Sections 45 and 48A; Karnataka Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1978 - Sections 1; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 417

Reported in : AIR2005SC3460; 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)961; 2005(4)AWC3160(SC); (SCSuppl)2006(2)CHN85; 100(2005)CLT608(SC); 2005(4)CTC534; [2006(2)JCR145(SC)]; JT2005(8)SC197; 2005(4)KLT192(SC); (; (2005) 7 SCC 300

Advocate for Respondent : V.B. Joshi, Adv.

S.B. Sinha. J.1. Interpretation of Sub-rule (3 ) of Rule 106 of Order XXI of the Code of Civil Procedure (Code) fells for consideration in this appeal which arises out of the judgment and order dated...

Government of Maharashtra and Ors. Vs. Deokar's Distillery

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 11, 12, 13, 49, 58, 58A, 114, 114(1) and 143(2); Maharashtra Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 1998; Constitution of India - Articles 162 and 309; Maharashtra Distillation of Spirit and Manufacture of Potable Liquor Rules, 1966 - Rules 15(1), 16(2), 17(12) and 17(43); Maharashtra Country Liquor Rules, 1973 - Rules 3(1), 4(2), 6(12)and 6(36); Maharashtra Foreign Liquor (Storage in Bond) Rules, 1964 - Rule 7; Maharashtra Foreign Liquor (Storage and Supply) Regulation, 1964; Andhra Pradesh Distillery Rules, 1970; Andhra Pradesh Excise Act, 1968 - Sections 28(2); Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4; Central Excise Rules - Rule 10A; Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 62; Finance Act, 1901 - Sections 10 and 10(1); Finance Act, 1940 - Sections

Reported in : AIR2003SC1216; 2003(4)ALLMR(SC)316; JT2003(3)SC86; 2003(3)SCALE124; (2003)5SCC669; [2003]2SCR852; 2003(2)LC1427(SC); MANU/SC/0216/2003

Advocate for Respondent : V.B. Joshi, Adv.

Ar. Lakshmanan, J.1. These three appeals are directed against the final judgment and order passed by the High Court of Judicature of Bombay in Writ Petition Nos. 3754/2000, 3753/2000 and 3698/2000. The common questions that arise...

K.Rakkianna Gounder Vs. Secretary to Government

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :29. 01.2014 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR W.P.No.33337 of 2013 M.P.No.1 of 2013 1.K.Rakkianna Gounder 2.R.Rajaram 3.R.Murugesan 4.S.Selvamani 5.S.Selvamurali 6.S.Selvananth ... Petitioners Vs. 1.The Secretary to...

income Tax Officer Vs. Subhash Metal Industries.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1995)51TTJ(Mumbai)68

ORDERM.K. CHATURVEDI, J.M. :These three appeals by the Revenue are directed against the order of the Dy. CIT(A), Central Range, Bombay and pertain to the asst. yrs. 1981-82, 1982-83 and 1983-84.2. The solitary ground taken in...

Mihir Engineers (P) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (1997)(94)ELT128TriDel

1. The issue involved in this appeal is the classification of 'air washers' manufactured by the assessee. The claim of the assessees was that the goods were classifiable under Chapter 39, being made of plastic material,...

Jai Ambe Plastex Industries Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1999)(113)ELT297TriDel

1. The short point involved in the appeal is whether the appellants can avail of benefit of SI. No. 40 of the Notification No. 53/88, dated 1-3-1988 or he should avail of benefit of Nil rate...