Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: v aravamudan · Page 1 of about 3 results (0.024 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 17 1991

Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanam Vs. Madras Port Trust

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-17-1991

Subject : Customs

Acts : CUSTOMS ACT, 1962 - Sections 6, 11, 111 and 124

Reported in : 1994(46)ECC48; 1995(79)ELT387(Mad); (1992)IIMLJ159

ORDER1. The prayer in the writ petition is as follows :- 'to issue a writ of mandamus or any other order or direction of like nature of a writ, directing the second respondent to reship the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 17 1991

Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanam Represented by Its Marketing Officer, V ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-17-1991

Subject : Contract

Reported in : (1992)2MLJ159

ORDERBakthavatsalam, J.1. The prayer in the writ petition is as follows:.to issue a writ of mandamus or any other order or direction of like nature of a writ, directing the second respondent to reship the consignment...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 02 1989

Union of India Vs. M/S. Cavalier Shipping Company, Madras and Another

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-02-1989

Subject : Civil

Acts : Calcutta High Court Original Side Rules - Order 14, Rule 10(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 7, Rule 10

Reported in : AIR1990Mad312

Advocate for Respondent : V. Aravamudan, Adv.

ORDER1. This is a case in which a shockingly inordinate delay of seventeen years and odd has been condoned by the Master without any notice to the defendants. No doubt. Rules do not insist upon notice...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial