Advanced Search Results

Ramrao Chudaman Patil Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Election

Acts : Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 - Sections 14 and 14(1); Maharashtra Municipalities Act; Maharashtra Village Panchayat Taxes and Fees Rules, 1960 - Rule 18

Reported in : 2007(3)ALLMR579; 2007(1)BomCR931

Advocate for Respondent : Umakant Patil, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3, ;D.S. Bagul, Adv. for Respondent No. 4 and ;S.P. Brahme, Adv. for Respondent No. 5

V.R. Kingaonkar, J.1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by consent of the parties.2. Both these petitions are being disposed of together inasmuch as identical questions of law and facts are involved therein. All...

Raju S/O Mohanrao Rathod Vs. the State of Maharashtra Through Police S ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : NarcoticsCriminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 20, 20(1), 42 and 50

Reported in : (2007)109BOMLR2744; 2008CriLJ1131

Advocate for Respondent : Umakant Patil, A.P.P.

V.R. Kingaonkar, J.1. This appeal is directed against Judgment of conviction and sentence rendered by learned Special Judge, Latur, in Special Case No. 15 of 2003. By the impugned Judgment, appellant herein is convicted for offence...

Vikramsing S/O Jalamsing Walvi and Uttam S/O Nimbha Deshmukh Vs. the S ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Election

Acts : Panchayats (Extension to the Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 - Sections 3 and 4; Constitution of India (Seventy Third) (Amendment) Act, 1992; Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961 - Sections 2(3), 2(26A), 4, 5, 6, 12, 12(2), 42, 42(4), 56, 58, 58(1B), 67 and 67(5); Maharashttra Scheduled Areas Order, 1985; Constitution of India - Articles 40, 226, 243, 243B, 243D, 243D(1), 243D(4), 243K, 243K(1), 243M, 243M(4), 243O, 244, 244(1), 254(1), 329 and 368; Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis (Manner and rotation of Reservation of Seats) Rules, 1996 - Rules 3, 4, 4(2), 7, 8, 8(2) and 14(2); Maharashtra Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samiti (Extension to the Scheduled Areas and Amendment) Ordinance, 1997; Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis (Amendm

Reported in : 2008(6)ALLMR497; 2009(2)BomCR330

Advocate for Respondent : Umakant Patil, A.G.P. for Respondent No. 1, ;S.T. Shelke, Adv. for Respondent No. 2, ;N.S. Chaudhary, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 3 to 5, ;V.D. Hon, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 6 and 7 and ;P.S. Patil, Adv.

N.V. Dabholkar, J.01. As described in petition paragraph 2 and prayer Clause (B), the Petitioners have approached this court for a relief of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in the...

Bakshisingh S/O Sahelsingh Vs. the State of Maharashtra,

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyCriminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 302, 420, 463, 468 and 471; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 197 and 482

Reported in : 2008CriLJ2420

Advocate for Respondent : Umakant Patil, A.P.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and ;S.K. Kulkarni, Adv. for Respondent No. 4

V.R. Kingaonkar, J.1. Both these applications filed Under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. are being disposed of together. For, they arise out of same set of fact situation. The applicants seek quashing of F.I.R. dated 14.6.2004...

Premachand S. Bansode and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ConstitutionCriminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 325 and 326

Reported in : 2007CriLJ142

Advocate for Respondent : Umakant Patil, APP

V.R. Kingaonkar, J.1. Aggrieved by their conviction and sentence for offence punishable under Section 307, r.w. Section 34 of the I.P. Code in Sessions Case No. 95/1992, the original accused Nos. 1 and 2 have come...

Motilal S. Rathod and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302, 304II and 498A

Reported in : 2007CriLJ837

Advocate for Respondent : Umakant Patil, A.P.P.

V.R. Kingaonkar, J.1. The appellants, who are husband and mother-in-law of the deceased Sau Kavlta, impugn the judgment and order of conviction and sentence rendered by the learned II Addl. Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in Sessions Case...

Shaikh Jaffar S/O Shaikh Ahmed Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through P ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 - Sections 5; Evidence Act - Sections 114; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 164, 437, 438 and 439; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 342 and 376

Reported in : (2008)110BOMLR249; 2008CriLJ2413; 2008(4)MhLj713

Advocate for Respondent : Umakant Patil, A.P.P.

V.R. Kingaonkar, J.1. Heard. 2. By this common order, I shall dispose of group of applications for bail, filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, in connection with Crime No. 160/2007 registered at...

Hiralal S/O Laxman Sarve and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 162 and 309

Reported in : 2007(5)BomCR188; 2007(6)MhLj162

Advocate for Respondent : V.B. Ghadge, AGP

Naresh H. Patil, J.1. Heard.2. The petitioners were employed as casual labours on different dates under the respondent No. 4 the Assistant Conservator of Forest. The petitioners' initial appointment was for a duration of three months...

Bhalchandra Bhagwan Kalwade Vs. Education Officer, Z.P. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981 - Rule 3(4)

Reported in : 2004(1)ALLMR231; 2004(5)BomCR429; 2003(4)MhLj1002

Advocate for Respondent : U.K. Patil, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 5, ;S.G. Chapalgaonkar, holding for ;S.C. Bora, Advs. for Respondent No 3 and ;S.P. Deshmukh, Holding for ;C.S. Deshmukh, Advs. for Respondent No. 4 in

B.B. Vagyani, J. (A.S. Bagga, J.)1. Heard.2. Shri Bhalchandra Bhagwan Kalwade, petitioner in Writ Petition No. 3158 of 1991 was appointed as an Assistant Teacher in Kanya Vidya Mandir High School, Ahmednagar conducted by Nav Vidya...

Maharashtra Tour and Travels and Bus Owners Association, Through Chief ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

A.H. Joshi, J. 1] Public Interest Litigation No.32/2011 is filed by association of Contract Carriage Bus Operators. Its members own bus or buses and they run those for carrying passengers between fixed destinations after availing permit....