Advanced Search Results

Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation Represented by Its Regional Mana ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1998)3MLJ385

ORDERRangasamy, J.1. This review application is filed under Order 47, Rule 1 read with Section 114 of Civil Procedure Code to reconsider the order passed by this Court in C.M.P.No. 20.50 of 1994 in A.S.No. 30...

R. George Thomas Vs. S. Lilly Samuvel

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 10 and 11

Reported in : I(1996)DMC583

Advocate for Respondent : Uma Venkataraman, Adv.

Srinivasan, J.1. It is very unfortunate that the learned District Judge has not even chosen to go through either the pleadings or the evidence on record; but granted divorce just because the respondent remained ex-parte.2. Even...

Ravindran Vs. P. Srichand

Court : Chennai

Subject : CriminalBanking

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 29(2) and 357(3)

Reported in : 2000CriLJ4910

Advocate for Respondent : Uma Venkataraman, Adv.

ORDERK. Natarajan, J.1. This criminal revision petition has been filed against the order of VIIth Additional Sessions Judge, Chennai dated 11-9-1998 modifying the conviction and sentence passed by the XIth Metropolitan Magistrate, Chennai under Section 138...

Joshi and Co., Represented by Power Agent L. Rajendran Vs. Uco Bank, M ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : LimitationCommercial

Reported in : (2002)3MLJ661

Advocate for Respondent : Uma Venkataraman, Adv.

ORDERP. Thangavel, J.1. This Civil Revision Petition has been filed by the second defendant/judgment debtor as revision petitioner against the order and decretal order dated 4.1.1999 and made in E.P.No.3038 of 1997 in O.S.No.2603 of 1981...

Petromarine Products Ltd., Company Incorporated Under the Laws of Cypr ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21 - Rule 52; ;Indian Limitation Act, 1808 - Article 182

Reported in : AIR2004Mad498; (2004)1MLJ525

Advocate for Respondent : S.Vasudevan, Adv. for Respondents 1, ;Srinivasa Raghavan, Adv. for Respondent 3, ;M.B. Gopalan, Adv. for Respondent 4 and ;V.Ramajegadeesan, Advocate Commissioner, Adv. for Respondent No. 5

A. Kulasekaran, J. 1. In this appeal, the appellant has challenged the order dated 06.10.1998, passed by the learned single Judge of Original Side in Application No.1217 of 1997 in C.S.No.97 of 1997. 2. Before the...