Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: uma sanyal · Page 1 of about 24 results (0.055 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 27 2001

Billeswar Saha Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-27-2001

Subject : Education

1. Shri Billeswar Saha working as Superintendent E/M Gr. I Engineering Stores Depot Office of the Chief Engineer, Calcutta Zone, Calcutta has filed this O.A. against his non-promotion as Supdt. EM/Gr. I from the date of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 28 1990

Divisional Railway Manager, Eastern Railway and ors. Vs. Satyajit Maju ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Nov-28-1990

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 19 and 38; ;Railways Act, 1890 - Section 148(2); ;Railways (Amendment) Act, 1989 - Section 200; ;Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Sections 3 and 28

Reported in : (1991)2CALLT214(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : Kashi Kanta Maitra and ;Bhaskar Prosad Vaisy, Advs.

Anandamoy Bhattacharjee, J.1. Even though Tennyson criticised British Laws as 'the Lawless Science of our Laws', as 'myriads of precedents' resulting in 'wilderness of single instances', the Poet also eulogised the system as where 'freedom broadens...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 31 1973

Pabitra Kumar Mitra Vs. Secretary, Home Department and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-31-1973

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1974CriLJ1177

Sudhamay Basu, J.1. This Rule obtained by the petitioner under Section 491 of the Code of Criminal Procedure relates to an order of the District Magistrate, Howrah dated the 26th of September, 1972 passed in exercise...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 02 1984

Sitaram Biyani and anr. Vs. Registrar of Companies

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-02-1984

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 211(7), 633, 633(1) and 633(2)

Reported in : [1985]58CompCas870(Cal),88CWN894

Advocate for Respondent : Uma Sanyal, Adv.

N.G. Chaudhuri, J. 1. This revision petition under Section 397/401 read with Section 482, Cr. PC, is directed against order dated June 27, 1980, passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 9th Court, Alipore, in. Case No. C/813...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 18 1984

Subrata Sarkar and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-18-1984

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesConstitution

Acts : Multi-Unit Co-operative Societies Act, 1942 - Sections 4(2) and 5B; ;West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act, 1973 - Sections 26(1) and 140; ;West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act, 1940

Reported in : AIR1986Cal198,88CWN885

Advocate for Respondent : Uma Sanyal, Adv. (for Nos. 1 and 2), ;Some Nath Chatterjee and ;Samir Kr. Ghosh, Advs. (for Nos. 3 to 5) and ;Debi Pal and ;Madhusudan Banerji, Advs. (for No. 6)

ORDERAmitabha Dutta, J.1. In this writ petition two shareholders of the Eastern and North-eastern Forntier Railway Co-operative Bank Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Co-operative Bank) have challenged the Notification dt. 1-3-1977 issued by the Government...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 1987

Bata India Ltd. Vs. Government of India and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-29-1987

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Section 4

Reported in : 1987(30)ELT907(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : S.N. Banerjee and ;Uma Sanyal, Advs.

Suhas Chandra Sen, J.1. The dispute in this case is about footwear known as 'Miners' Boots'. These boots are also known in the market and sold as 'Industrial Safety Boots'. According to the petitioner, both the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 18 1983

NilsIn Company Vs. Collector of Central Excise and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-18-1983

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 3 and 25; ;Central Excise (Amendement) Act, 1972; ;Central Excise (Amendement) Act, 1973; ;Central Excise (Amendement) Act, 1977; ;Central Excise (Amendement) Act, 1979; ;Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax Act; ;Central Excise Rules

Reported in : 1984(2)ECC278,1985(22)ELT739(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : R.N. Das and ;Uma Sanyal, Advs.

Chittatosh Mookerjee, J.1. The petitioner-firm, since the year 1965, had been manufacturing 'ultramarine blue' at its factory at 59, Grand Trunk Road, Liluah, District Howrah. The petitioner-firm had taken out requisite licence for manufacturing excisable goods...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 14 1983

Brooke Bond India Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-14-1983

Subject : Excise

Acts : Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Section 5-A; ;Sales Tax Act; ;Central Excise Act - Section 2; ;Bombay Sales Tax Act - Section 2(17); ;Transfer of Property Act - Section 106; ;English Finance Act, 1901

Reported in : 1988(34)ELT590(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : N.C. Roy Choudhury and ;Uma Sanyal, Advs.

Dipak Kumar Sen, J.1. Brooke Bond India Ltd., the petitioner No. 1, is an existing company within the meaning of the Companies Act, 1956. Satya Paul Saigal, the petitioner No. 2, is a shareholder of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 05 1984

Arora International Vs. Collector of Customs and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-05-1984

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Section 111; ; Import (Control) Order, 1955 - Section 3(1)

Reported in : 1985(5)ECC30,1989(24)LC92(Calcutta),1988(34)ELT425(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : Uma Sanyal, Adv.

Ajit Kumar Sengupta, J.1. The petitioner No. 2, A.K. Arora carries on business in import and export of goods under the name and style of M/s. Arora International.2. On or about 21st February, 1983, a REP...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 17 1987

Laxmhi Narayan Ram Niwas Vs. Collector of Customs and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-17-1987

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Section 15; ;Customs Act - Section 25; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1987(32)ELT12(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : N.N. Roy Choudhury, ;Nilara Guha and ;Uma Sanyal, Advs.

Sudhir Ranjan Roy, J.1. The petitioner is a Company carrying on business, inter alia, of importing and dealing in waste and scrap of various non-ferrous metals including brass waste and scrap.2. By a notification bearing No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial