Advanced Search Results

Kasimkhan Vs. Chandratan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : TenancyLimitation

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 23, Rule 1(2); Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 5

Reported in : AIR1954Raj25

Advocate for Respondent : Ugam Raj, Adv. for; Chaitandas, Adv.

Bapna, J.1. This is a second appeal in a suit for ejectment and arrears of rent.2. The respondent Chandratan sued the appellant Kasirokhan for ejectment and arrears of rent in respect of a house and a...

Mohan Lal Vs. Rakesh Meghwal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Election

Reported in : 1998(1)WLN389

V.S. Kokje, J.1. The petitioner who was the official candidate of the Indian National Congress in the last assembly elections held in the year 1993 from the Parbatsar Assembly Constituency No. 197 of the Rajasthan Legislative...

Rao Raja Tej Singh and ors. Vs. Hastimal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Family

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 90; ;Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 14

Reported in : AIR1972Raj191

Advocate for Respondent : Hastimal, Adv. for Respondents in Appeal No. 48 of 1967 and; R.L. Purohit and;

Kan Singh, J.1. The two appeals before me arise out of the judgment and decree of the learned Senior Civil Judge No. 1, Jodhpur in a suit under Order 21, Rule 103, Civil Procedure Code.2. Plaintiff...

Devi Shankar Vs. Ugam Raj

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100 - Order 6, Rule 2; Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 - Sections 13(1)

Reported in : AIR2002Raj330; 2002(3)WLN19

Advocate for Respondent : G.R. Singhvi, Adv.

ORDERSunil Kumar Garg, J.1. This second appeal has been filed by the appellant-defendant against the judgment and decree dated 22-12-1983 passed by the learned Addl. District Judge, Udaipur in Civil Appeal No. 15/1983 by which he...

K and C Daga Vs. K.S. Pillay

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : 1977WLN(UC)190

M.L. Jain, J.1. The facts of this writ petition are that the Bikaner Gypsums Ltd. used to hire labour through contractors for doing certain jobs including the job of loading gypsum from the railway siding to...

Manakchand Vs. Bansidhar and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Prevention of Eviction Order, 1942 - Sections 4 and 8

Reported in : AIR1950Raj29

Advocate for Respondent : Ugam Raj, Adv. for; Chaitan Das, Adv.

Datta, J. 1. This is an application to revise the order of the Sessions Judge, Churu, dated 6th September 1949. The short question in this revision is that whether the Notification No. 19 dated 17th March...

Rameshwar Lal Soni S/O Late Shri Vs. A.C.i.T., Inv.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jodhpur

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)91ITD301(Jodh.)

1. These appeals came before me as a third Member to express my opinion on the following question: "Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case the assessee appellant entitled to get the benefit of...

Assistant Commissioner of Income Vs. Ashok Kumar Chhugani

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jodhpur

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)104TTJ(Jodh.)134

1. This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order passed by the CIT(A) on 5th April, 1994 in relation to asst. yr. 1990-91.2. First ground is against the reduction in the addition of Rs....

Dr. O.P. Bhargava Vs. the State and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34 and 420

Reported in : 29(1986)DLT62

Advocate for Respondent : Sodhi Teja Singh, Adv. and ; D.R. Sethi, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3

H.C. Goel, J.1. This is a revision petition against the order of Shri H.P. Bagchi, Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi dated October 25,1983 by which he discharged Mani Madhukar and his wife, Rachna Mani, accused/respondents 2 and...

Bhag Chand Vs. A.D.J. No. 5 and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : AIR2009Raj178; RLW2009(3)Raj2081

ORDERDalip Singh, J.1. The questions for consideration which have been referred to the Larger Bench for decision are as follows:(1) Whether Section 29 of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 has its overriding effect on Section...