Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: u abdul khader · Page 1 of about 42 results (0.092 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 08 1985

Narayana Bhatta Vs. R.T.O.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-08-1985

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Karnataka Motor Vehicles Rules, 1963 - Sections 63(6) and 63(7), Rule 216

Advocate for Respondent : U. Abdul Khader, HCGP

ORDERK.A. Swami, J.1. In this Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, the Petitioner has sought for quashing the endorsement dated 2-9-1985 bearing No. RTO. RGN. NR PR. 146/ 85-86 issued by the respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 24 1987

The Sugar-cane Growers' Association Vs. State of Karnataka and Ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-24-1987

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Sugar-cane (Control) Order, 1966; Constitution of India - Article 19

Reported in : AIR1988Kant132

Advocate for Respondent : W.K. Joshi, Adv. and ;U. Abdul Khader, High Court Govt. Pleader

ORDER1. This matter is disposed of at the stage of preliminary hearing after notice to respondents and after hearing the Counsel for the petitioner and the respondents.2. The petitioner is the Sugar-cane Growers' Association B. K....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 18 2006

R. Veeranna S/O Late B. Rudraiah Vs. State of Karnataka Represented by ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-18-2006

Subject : Property

Acts : Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 - Sections 95; Town and Country Planning Act - Sections 13(3), 14, 15, 15(1) and 15(2); Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1964 - Sections 6, 8, 10, 11,11(1) and 11(21); Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act - Sections 321; Mysore Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 - Sections 4; Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) Rules, 1971 - Rules 26, 26(1), 27 and 27(1)

Advocate for Respondent : U. Abdul Khader, Adv. for R3 and ;T.A. Ramachandraiah, HCGP., for R1 and R2

ORDERMohan Shantanagoudar, J.1. Petitioner has sought for quashing the endorsements dated 4.2.2003 and 18.3.2003 vide Annexures-D' & 'E' respectively issued by the 3rd respondent - Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) and the notice dated 27.6.2003 vide Annexure-'C'...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 04 2005

Bhavani Housing Co-operative Society Limited Vs. Bangalore Development ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-04-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bangalore Development Act 1976 - Sections 2, 30(2), 32, 32(1), 32(2), 32(5), 32(7), 38 and 38A; Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959; Karnataka Parks, Play-Fields and Open Spaces (Preservation and Regulation) Act 1985; Bangalore Development Authority (Allotment of Civic Amenity Sites) Rules 1989 - Rules 2, 3 and 3(3)

Reported in : ILR2006KAR1352; 2006(2)KarLJ630

Advocate for Respondent : U. Abdul Khader, Adv. for R1 and ;Anant Mandagi, Adv. for R2

ORDERMohan Shantanagoudar, J.1. Heard Sri Udaya Holla, Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri U. Abdul Khadar, Learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent No. 1 authority and Sri Anant Mandagi Learned Counsel appearing for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 20 2003

M.P. Krishnappa Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-20-2003

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2003(4)KarLJ1

Advocate for Respondent : C. Shashikantha, Additional Central Government Standing Counsel for Respondent-1, ;S. Vijayashankar, Sr. Adv. and ;U. Abdul Khader, Adv. for Respondent-2, ;K. Tharanatha Shetty, Adv. for Respondent-3,

ORDER1. The petitioner is a practising Advocate having served as Director of the Union Bank of India for 5 years and having technical knowledge of Bank and banking transactions. It is stated that while he was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 1996

Siddaramappa Patil Vs. President, Bharathiya Vidhya Vardhaka Sangha an ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-26-1996

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 1997(1)KarLJ158

Advocate for Respondent : U. Abdul Khader, Adv.

Hari Nath Tilhari, J.1. Heard Mrs. Asha Kumbargerimath, holding brief for Mr. I.G. Gachchinmath, learned Counsel appearing for petitioner and Mr. U. Abdul Khader, learned Counsel appearing for respondent No. 2, United India Insurance Co. Ltd....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 03 2007

R. Veeranna Vs. State of Karnataka Represented by Its Home Secretary a ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-03-2007

Subject : Media and Communication

Acts : Karnataka Cinema (Regulation) Act, 1954 - Sections 11 and 11(2); Karnataka Cinema (Regulation) Rules - Rule 27 and 27(1); Mysore Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 - Sections 4; Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act; Zonal Regulations

Reported in : ILR2008KAR4704

Advocate for Respondent : U. Abdul Khader, Adv. for R3 and ;A.G. Shivanna, Adl. G.A. for R1 and R2

K. Sreedhar Rao, J.1. The appellant applied to R.2 for N.O.C. for building a Permanent Cinema Theatre in Nagadevanahalli, Kengeri Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk. The proposed construction was the part of Sy. No. 54/2A of Nagadevanahalli....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 1986

T.R.N. Swamy Vs. Director of Mines and Geology

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-16-1986

Subject : Civil

Acts : Karnataka Minor Minerals Concession Rules, 1969 - Sections 61 and 62

Reported in : ILR1987KAR262

Advocate for Respondent : N. Santosh Hegde, Adv. General and ;R.J. Babu, Adv.

ORDERMurlidher Rao, J.1. Petitioner has filed these two petitions. Common set of facts have given rise to two causes of action. Reliefs asked for are separate but concerning a common transaction.Facts :Petitioner applied for grant of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 2001

Samrat Ashok Exports Ltd. Vs. Asst. Provident Fund Commissioner and Re ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-21-2001

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rule 77

Reported in : AIR2002Kant61

Advocate for Respondent : Ashok Haranahalli, C.G.S.C. for Respondent No. 1, ;D.L.N. Rao and ;Anuradha, Advs. and ;Ashok Haranahalli, C.G.S.C.

ORDERR. Gururajan, J.1. M/s. Samrat Ashok Exports Ltd., is before this Court challenging the Auction proceedings dated 28-3-2001 at Annexure 'C' on the following facts.2. The petitioner M/s. Samrat Ashok Exports Ltd., is the owner of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 2007

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. H. Palaksha S/O Mari Erappa and M. ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-12-2007

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act - Sections 3

Reported in : 2008ACJ2283; [2007(115)FLR326]; 2007(4)KLJ344

Advocate for Respondent : K.R. Murali Krishna, Adv. for R1

V. Jagannathan, J.1. An accident occurred on 25.10.1996 at 6.30 P.M., near K.B. cross, involving Lorry bearing No. KA-34-5999, driven by the first respondent and another Lorry bearing No. TMD-5099, driven by the driver concerned and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial