Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: titus jesudoss · Page 1 of about 7 results (0.029 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 24 1997

Kalyan Gangathara Jawahar Vs. the Government of Tamil Nadu, Represente ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-24-1997

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1997)2MLJ107

ORDERE. Padmanabhan, J.1. The petitioner has prayed for the issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus, to call for the records relating to the G.O. (1D) No. 44, dated 21.3.1996, quash the same and direct the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 12 1997

H. Chunnilal Bagman Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu Represented by the Joi ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-12-1997

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : (1998)1MLJ395

ORDERP. Sathasivam, J.1. The petitioner has approached this Court to issue a writ or mandamus directing the third respondent to hand over the vehicle bearing Registration No. KA. 01.182 seized by the second respondent in UDSTOR...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 08 1999

S. Ramaswamy and Four Others Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Its C ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-08-1999

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 -- Order 1, Rule 10

Reported in : 1999(3)CTC335

Advocate for Respondent : Ms. Selvi George for ;Mr. Titus Jesudoss Additional Government Pleader (Forest Cases) Adv.

ORDER1. The plaintiffs in O.S.No. 8 of 1993 on the file of the Additional Sub Court, Nagercoil, are the revision petitioners. The first respondent filed I.A.NO. 199 of 97 in the suit under Order 1, Rule...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 31 1999

R. Senniappan Vs. the Wildlife Warden. Indira Gandhi Wild Life Sanctua ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-31-1999

Subject : Environment

Acts : Constitution of India, 1950 -- Articles 43-A, 51-A and 226; Wile Life Protection Act, 1972 -- Sections 12, 18, 26, 27, 28, 29, 33, 38 and 44; The Wild Life (Transit) (Tamil Nadu) Rules, 1991

Reported in : 1999(3)CTC494

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Titus Jesudoss, Special Government Pleader (F) Adv.

ORDER1. The above writ petitions are filed by four petitioners who claim to be agriculturists residing in Pollachi and Udumalpet taluks. According to them, they are rearing cattle to run their livelihood and in the absence...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 20 2000

Padavettai and ors. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-20-2000

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Tamil Nadu Forest Act, 1882 - Sections 16(2)

Reported in : AIR2000Mad524

Advocate for Respondent : Titus Jesudoss, Spl. Govt. Pleader (Forest)

ORDERY. Venkatachalam, J.1. Invoking Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners herein have filed the present writ petition, seeking for a writ of Certiorari to call for the records from the respondents relating to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 17 2006

Elizebath Anne Simpson and ors. Vs. K. Shivashankaran, the Tahsildar

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-17-2006

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Forest Conservation Act, 1980 - Sections 2 and 2(1)

Reported in : (2006)4CTR(Mad)426

Advocate for Respondent : P.S. Raman, Addl. Adv. General Assisted by ;Titus Jesudoss, Spl. Govt. Pleader (Forest) and ;P. Wilson, Spl. Govt. Pleader (Writs)

ORDERP. Sathasivam, J.1. The petitioners, complaining that the common order dated 20.01.1997 made in W.P.Nos. 2585 and 2586 of 1994 has not been implemented, filed contempt petition Nos. 742 and 748 of 2002.2. The contempt petitioners...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2007

Panchura Estate Ltd., Rep. by Its Managing Director V.K. Mehta Vs. the ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-13-2007

Subject : Property

Acts : Gudalur Janmam Estate (Abolition and Conversion into Royatwari) Act, 1969 - Sections 41

Reported in : (2007)3MLJ481

Advocate for Respondent : S. Ramasamy, Additional Adv. General-II assisted by ;Titus Jesudoss, Adv. and ;P.P. Rajendran, Adv. for 3rd respondent in STA. No. 13/03

P. Sathasivam, J.1. Since the issues involved in all these appeals are identical, they are being disposed of by the following common order.2. In the light of the order to be passed hereunder, we are of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial