Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: thiru c natarajan · Page 1 of about 4 results (0.029 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 21 2003

P.P. Products (P) Limited and ors. Vs. Deputy Commercial Tax Officer a ...

Court : Sales Tax Tribunal STT Tamil Nadu

Decided on : Feb-21-2003

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2005)139STC106Tribunal

1. All these original petitions are filed by different petitioners-some of them are assessees under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 in Tamil Nadu, some assessees in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 07 1977

Jeewanlal (1929) Ltd. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-07-1977

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1978]42STC263(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : Additional Government Pleader

P. Govindan Nair, C.J.1. The question arising in this tax revision case is not a very easy one to resolve, but the facility to answer that has been enhanced by almost unanimous decisions one way in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 07 1977

Jeevanlal (1929) Ltd. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-07-1977

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1978)7CTR(Mad)238

P. Govindan Nair, C.J. - The question arising in this tax revision case is not a very easy one to resolve, but the facility to answer that has been enhanced by almost unanimous decisions one way...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 08 1985

Union of India and ors. Vs. S.S.M. Bros. Pvt. Ltd. and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-08-1985

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Eexcise ACT, 1944 - Sections 3 and 4; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 96J and 173C; ;Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4

Reported in : 1985(5)ECC173; 1985(22)ELT766(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : Thiru C. Natarajan, Adv.

ORDERRamanujam, J.1. In all these appeals, the common question that arises for consideration is, as to whether the respondent in each of these appeals is entitled to exclude the trade discount as well as cash discount...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial