Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: tarun verma · Page 1 of about 158 results (0.071 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 18 2002

Lily Chemicals (P.) Ltd. and anr. Vs. Chairperson, Debts Recovery Appe ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-18-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 17(2), 20, 20(1), 20(2) and 22(2); Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1994 - Rule 8(2)

Reported in : 2002(1)AWC605; [2002]110CompCas419(All); (2002)1UPLBEC502

Advocate for Respondent : Tarun Verma, Adv.

R.R. Yadav, J.1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Shasht Nandan as well as Sri Tarun Verma, learned counsel representing respondent No. 4, Canara Bank, Saharanpur Road Branch, Dehradun, who is only contesting respondent....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 30 2006

Kesarwani and Company Vs. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and ors ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-30-2006

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (2007)1LLJ174All

Advocate for Respondent : Sri. Chaturvedi

Vineet Saran, J.1. Heard Sri Ravi Kant, learned senior counsel assisted by Sri Umesh Chandra Kesarwani, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri Satish Chaturvedi, learned Counsel appearing for the respondents No. 1 and 2...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 31 1999

Smt. Akhtari and Another Vs. District and Sessions Judge, Muzaffarnaga ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-31-1999

Subject : Property

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Agricultural Credit Act, 1973 - Sections 11A; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 275 to 294 and 330

Reported in : 1999(4)AWC3411

Advocate for Respondent : S.C. and ;Tarun Verma, Adv.

D.K. Seth, J.1. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 12.8.1999 passed in Misc. Appeal No. 153 of 1999 by the learned District Judge, Muzaffarnagar. The said order arises out of the suit being Original Suit...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 19 2003

Willard India Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-19-2003

Subject : Banking

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Debts Recovery Tribunal (Procedure) (Amendment) Rules, 2003 - Rule 6 and 6(1); Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 19

Reported in : III(2003)BC497; (2003)2UPLBEC1760

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Singh and ;Tarun Verma, Advs. and ;B.N. Singh, S.S.C.

M. Katju, J.1. Heard Mr. R.N. Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. A.K. Singh for the Union of India and Mr. Tarun Verma, Counsel for the Allahabad Bank.2. The petitioner has prayed for an appropriate...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 19 2004

Balagat HusaIn Vs. Vth Additional District Judge and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-19-2004

Subject : CivilTenancy

Acts : Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 - Sections 25; Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 20 and 30

Reported in : 2004(3)AWC2754

Advocate for Respondent : Tarun Verma, S.C.

Tarun Agarwala, J.1. The petitioner filed a suit for eviction of the defendant from the premises in question on the ground that the defendant committed a default in the payment of rent. The defendant contested the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 1998

Sanjay Kumar and Others Vs. District Judge, Gorakhpur and Another

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-24-1998

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 6, Rule 17; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 1998(3)AWC1984

Advocate for Respondent : S.C., ;Tarun Verma, ;Rajiv Chandra and ;B.D. Pandey, Advs.

D.K. Seth, J. 1. In Civil Suit No. 770 of 1989 initiated before the additional court of learned Munsif at Gorakhpur, four of the plaintiffs were shown as minors without being represented by next friend. An...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 17 1999

Ram Pal Singh Vs. Regional Manager, P.N.B., Moradabad and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-17-1999

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1999(3)AWC2088; [1999(82)FLR969]; (2000)ILLJ225All; (1999)2UPLBEC1477

Advocate for Respondent : Tarun Verma, Adv.

D.K. Seth, J.1. The petitioner has been suspended some time in 1993. It is alleged that a criminal case is pending out of the same prosecution. Mr. R. K. Kakkar, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 01 2004

Laxman Singh Vs. Director General, Railway Protection Force (Rpf), Rai ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-01-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987 - Rules 155, 156(3) and 157; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2005)1UPLBEC48

Advocate for Respondent : Tarun Verma, ;Anand Kumar and ;J.S. Pandey, Advs. and ;S.C.

R.B. Misra, J.1. Heard Sri A.B. Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Sri Tarun Verma, learned Counsel for the respondents.2. In this petition prayer has been made for quashing the impugned order dated 31.10.1995 passed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 25 2006

Smt. Atro Devi Wife of Late Dharampal Singh and Pravesh Kumar Son of L ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-25-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 226

Reported in : 2007(1)AWC289; [2006(111)FLR143]

Advocate for Respondent : Tarun Verma, Adv.

D.P. Singh, J.1. Heard Sri Vinod Sinha, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Sri Tarun Verma for the respondents.2. This petition is directed against orders dated 18.6.2004 and 5.3.2005 whereby the claim for compassionate appointment has...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 13 2002

Tej NaraIn Misra Vs. Central Administrative Tribunal and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-13-2002

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2003(3)AWC2237

Advocate for Respondent : Tarun Verma and ;P.C. Srivastava, Advs.

ORDERM. Katju and Yatindra Singh, JJ.1. Heard counsel for the petitioner and Sri Tarun Verma for the Railway. 2. Petitioner is challenging the impugned order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Annexure-12 to the petition. The petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial