Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: tapan kumar sengupta · Page 1 of about 10 results (0.109 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 15 1988

Pradip Kumar Hazra Vs. the Managing Director, Durgapur State Transport ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-15-1988

Subject : CivilService

Acts : West Bengal Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1971 - Rule 10(10)

Reported in : (1988)2CALLT359(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : Tapan Kumar Sengupta and ;Debayan Bera, Advs.

Mahitosh Majumdar, J.1. This writ application is directed against the charge-sheet, as contained in page 34 of the Writ application, which was issued to this effect that while the petitioner was performing his duties in the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 25 1995

Swapan Bose Vs. Ram Krishna Co-operative Bank Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-25-1995

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act; ;West Bengal Co-operative Societies Rules, 1987 - Rules 48 and 108; ;Constitution of India - Articles 12, 226 and 311(2)

Reported in : (1996)ILLJ1180Cal

Advocate for Respondent : Bhaskar Sen and ;Tapan Kr. Sengupta, Advs.

N.K. Batabyal, J.1. The writ petitioner was appointed as a Chief Executive Officer in Ram Krishna Cooperative Bank Ltd. (hereinafter called the Bank) registered under the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act for a probationary period of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 1981

Trambaklal Dayalal Kothari Vs. L.K. Dey and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-30-1981

Subject : Civil

Acts : Court-fees Act, 1870 - Section 19H(3)

Reported in : AIR1982Cal217

Advocate for Respondent : Ashok Kumar Sengupta and ;Tapan Kumar Sengupta, Advs.

ORDERManashnath Roy, J. 1. In this Rule, which was obtained with a corresponding interim order On 21st June, 1974, the petitioner, Trambaklal Dayalal Kothari, has impeached certain orders made by the Probate Deputy Collector, being Respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 20 1998

Oil and Natural Gas Commission Ltd. Vs. Dilip Construction

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Nov-20-1998

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20 and 30

Reported in : AIR2000Cal140

Advocate for Respondent : P.K. Roy and ;Tapan Kumar Sengupta, Advs.

ORDERAmitava Lala, J.1. This application made by the petitioner under Sections 30 and 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 challenging the award dated 30th July, 1996 passed by an Arbitrator being chief Geologist, now Deputy General...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 31 1978

Asrafannessa Khanum Vs. Mirza Ali ZamIn and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-31-1978

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesProperty

Acts : Bengal Wakf Act, 1934 - Section 70(1)

Reported in : AIR1979Cal53,83CWN41

Advocate for Respondent : S.C. Dasgupta, ;Tapan Kumar Sengupta and ;Soumen Das Gupta, Advs.

B.N. Maitra, J.1. The plaintiff instituted the suit for declaration that he was the sole mutawalli of the wakf estate in question and the defendants were not validly appointed mutwallis. The defence was that the suit...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 27 1984

State of West Bengal Vs. Musst. Nurjahan Sakil and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-27-1984

Subject : Property

Acts : West Bengal Land Development and Planning Act, 1948 - Section 8; ;Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 9, 9(3), 18, 23 and 25

Reported in : AIR1985Cal39,88CWN953

Advocate for Respondent : Saktinath Mukherjee and ;Tapan Kumar Sengupta, Advs.

B.C. Ray, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree passed in LRA Case No. 25 of 1969 (VI on 11th Aug 1982 by Sri A. K. Chakraborty, 3rd Additional Special Judge. Alipore,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 12 1989

Pratima Paul and Others Vs. Competent Authority and Others

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-12-1989

Subject : Property

Acts : Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 4, 4(4) and (7), 6, 6(1) and (2), 8(3), 33 and 47;; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15(1) and 227

Reported in : AIR1990Cal185,93CWN1146

Advocate for Respondent : Tapan Kumar Sengupta, ;Debayan Bera and ;Prafulla Kumar Ghosh, Advs.; Swadesh Bhusan Bhunia, Adv.

ORDERA.M. Bhattacharjee, J. 1. I have had the advantage of going through the Judgement prepared by my learned brother, A. K. Nandi, J. and I agree that for the reasons stated by him we must make...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 07 1998

Rajeswar Das Vs. Durgapur State Transport Corporation

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-07-1998

Subject : Service

Acts : West Bengal Service (Clarification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1971

Reported in : (1998)2CALLT32(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Tapan Kumar Sengupta and ;Mr. Debayan Bera, Advs.

V.K. Gupta, J.1. The petitioner was working as a Bus Conductor with the Durgapur State Transport Corporation at the relevant time. He was served with a charge sheet on 19th December, 1981 whereby he was accused...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 28 2003

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Pam Developments Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Oct-28-2003

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11 and 34

Reported in : 2004(2)ARBLR480(Cal),2004(1)CHN407

Advocate for Respondent : Pranab Kumar Ray, ;Promit Roy and ;Tapan Kumar Sengupta, Advs.

1. This is an application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the 'said Act' in short) for setting aside of the award made and published on January 25, 2002 by Mr. Satyabrata...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 06 1999

Gita Bhattacharjee (Smt.) and ors. Vs. South Bengal State Transport Co ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-06-1999

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Durgapur State Transport Corporation Employees' Service Regulations - Regulations 35(5), 38, 38(9) and 39(3); ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2000(87)FLR693],(2000)IILLJ377Cal

Advocate for Respondent : Tapan Kumar Sengupta and ;Debayan Bera, Advs.

D.P. Kundu, J.1. This appeal has arisen out of judgment and order dated September 24, 1991 passed by MAHITESH majUMDAR, J. as he then was in Civil Order No. 9654 (W) of 1990 to the extent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial