Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: taj pal · Page 1 of about 6 results (0.018 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 07 2000

Malti Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-07-2000

Subject : FamilyCriminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125

Reported in : 2000CriLJ4170; I(2001)DMC204

Advocate for Respondent : Taj Pal, A.G.A., ;Ram Babu Sharma, ;S.P. Singh, ;A.P. Singh, ;Braham Singh and ;Ran Vijay Singh, Advs.

ORDERS.K. Agarwal, J.1. This revision arises against the judgment dated 17.5.1993 passed in Criminal Revision No. 341 of 1991 by IVth Additional Sessions Judge Budaun allowing the revision and setting aside the order passed in Criminal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 2008

Hc Rohtash Singh Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi Through

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Decided on : Apr-24-2008

Subject : Service Tax

1. Delhi Police (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1980 (hereinafter to be referred as the Rules of 1980) envisage both preliminary and regular departmental enquiries. A preliminary enquiry is a fact-finding enquiry. Its purpose is to establish...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 08 1974

All Hassan and ors. Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-08-1974

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1975CriLJ345

ORDERP.N. Bakshi, J.1. Ali Hasan, Sher Khan, Lakhan Singh, Ashraf and Ghulam Nabi have been convicted by the Sessions Judge, Bijnor for an offence .under Section 396, I.P.C. and each of them has been sentenced to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 07 2003

Bhikam Singh and ors. Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-07-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 32 and 300; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 174

Reported in : 2004CriLJ2120

Advocate for Respondent : A.G.A.

U. S. Tripathi, J.1. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 25-7-1981 passed by Sessions Judge, Badau in Session Trial No. 64 of 1980, convicting the appellants Bhikam Singh, Rajendra Singh, Ram...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 1991

Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education Vs ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-12-1991

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 29(2), 51A, 136 and 226; Maharashtra Secondary and Higher Secondary Education Board Act, 1965 - Sections 23(2), 23(3), 23(5), 36(2), 36(3), 4, 18 and 19; Maharashtra Secondary and Higher Secondary Education Board Regulations, 1977 - Regulations 9(2), 14(1) and 14(2);

Reported in : JT1991(2)SC296; 1991(1)SCALE187; (1991)2SCC716; [1991]1SCR773; AIR 1991 SC 879

Advocate for Respondent : P. Chidambaram, ; Arun Jaitely, ; I.R. Joshi, ;

K. Ramaswamy, J. 1. We have heard the learned Counsel on either side and grant special leave to appeal in all the cases.2. The quest for just result to save the precious academic years to the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 02 2011

Satyavir Singh Rathi Vs. State Thr. C.B.i.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-02-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

HARJIT SINGH BEDI, J.This judgment will dispose of Criminal Appeal Nos.2231 of 2009, 2476 of 2009 and 2477-2484 of 2009. The facts have been taken from Criminal Appeal No. 2231 of 2009 (Satyavir Singh Rathi vs....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial