Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: taher ali · Page 1 of about 40 results (0.024 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 19 1984

In Re: S.S. Kothari

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-19-1984

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 25(1) 49, 111, 112, 115(1), 115(2) and 125; ;Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Section 3; ;Finance Act, 1984; ;Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947 - Sections 3 and 3(2); ;Imports (Control) Order, 1955; ;Imports and Exports Control Order, 1947

Reported in : 1985(6)ECC81,1987(30)ELT156(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : Taher Ali, Adv.

ORDERThe importation of the motor car along with fittings worth Rs. 1,20,973.73 without a valid licence is prohibited under Section 111 of the Customs Act read with Section 3 of the Imports & Exports (Control) Act...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 15 2011

Kailash Gour and ors Vs. State of Assam.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-15-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 448, 324, 302, 34, 326; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 161

Reported in : 2012(1)KLT43(SN),2012(2)SCC34; 2012(1)SCC(Cri)717; AIR2012SCW524; 2012CriLJ1050

T.S. THAKUR, J.1. This appeal arises out of a judgment and order dated 29th June, 2006, passed by the High Court of Judicature at Gauhati whereby Criminal Appeal No.133 of 2005 filed by the appellants has...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 14 1984

Kailash Kumar Marodia Vs. Joint Chief Controller of Imports and Export ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-14-1984

Subject : CustomsCommercial

Reported in : 1985(6)ECC93

Ajit Kumar Sengupta, J.1. The petitioner carries on business under the name and style of 'Steel and Allied Product Exporters' as sole proprietor thereof. The petitioner also carries on business of import and export of various...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 14 2009

Kalim Bhai @ KalimuddIn and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-14-2009

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : 2009(3)WLN327

Sangeet Lodha, J.1. In this writ petition, the petitioners have challenged the judgments and decrees dt. 02.06.1987, 18.07.1996 and 25.09.2001 passed by the Assistant Collector, Banswara, Revenue Appellate Authority, Banswara and Board of Revenue, Rajasthan respectively.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 1996

Mir Taher Ali Khan Vs. Chairman, A.P. Housing Board Through Competent ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-23-1996

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Mohammedan Law - Sections 347(1), 348, 349 and 350; Indian Registration Act, 1908

Reported in : 1996(2)ALT674

Advocate for Respondent : G.P. and ;C. Poornaiah, Adv.

D.H. Nasir, J.1. This appeal is directed against the Judgment and decree dated 12-2-1987 passed by the Additional Chief Judge-cum-I Additional Special Judge for SPE and ACB cases, City Civil Court, Hyderabad in OSNo. 277 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 08 2005

Taher Ali Khan Vs. Abdul Hakim and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-08-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Transfer of Property Act - Section 54; ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 134; ;Indian Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 180; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 65, 96, 100 and 151 - Order 1, Rules 10 and 13 - Order 21, Rules 35, 89, 90, 92, 94, 95 and 96; ;Indian Cricket Council Rules

Reported in : AIR2006Cal124,(2006)1CALLT496(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : Oli Mohammad and ;Biswarupa Mitra, Advs.

Arun Kumar Mitra, J.1. Throwing a challenge to the judgment dated 6th September, 1986 and decree dated 26th September, 1986 passed by the learned 1st Court, Additional District Judge, Midnapore in T.A. No. 240 of 1985...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 18 1965

Amritraj Kothari Vs. Golecha Financiers

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-18-1965

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 34 and 41 - Schedule - Rule 4; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 12, Rule 6

Reported in : AIR1966Cal315

Advocate for Respondent : B.N. Sen, Adv.

ORDERP.C. Mallick, J.1. This is an application for stay of a suit under Section 34 of the Indian Arbitration Act. It is not disputed that the disputes in suit are covered by the arbitration clause in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 14 1987

Provash Kumar Dey Vs. Inspector of Central Excise and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-14-1987

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Section 36; ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 32(1), 32(2), 39 and 40

Reported in : 1988(15)ECC310,1987(31)ELT13(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : Taher Ali, Adv.

Sudhir Ranjan Roy, J.1. The petitioner is a Trader of Biri tobacco at village Bagula Bazar in the District of Nadia and he carries on business under Central Excise Licence No. 322 of 1963.2. The tobacco...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 07 1986

Bharat Warehousing Corporation and ors. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-07-1986

Subject : Customs

Acts : General Clauses Act; Customs Act, 1962 - Section 58, 58(1) and 58(2);General Clauses Act;

Reported in : 1989(24)LC97(Calcutta),1988(34)ELT423(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : Taher Ali and ;S.P. Talukdar, Advs.

Suhas Chandra Sen, J.1. In this writ petition, M/s. Bharat Ware Housing Corporation, and others have challenged a show cause notice dated 19th July 1984 and also a circular dated 31st January 1984 by which it...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 06 2006

The Commissioner of Central Vs. Taher Ali Industries and Projects

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on : Nov-06-2006

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2007)(210)ELT270Tri(Bang.)

1. These appeals have been filed against the Orders-in-Appeal No. 110 & 111/2005 dated 29.4.2005, passed by the Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise (Appeals-III), Hyderabad.2. The appellants manufactured MS Pipes and supplied to Hyderabad Metro...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial