Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: t v ratnam · Page 1 of about 50 results (0.075 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 08 2009

Katari Suryanarayana and ors. Vs. Koppisetti Subba Rao and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-08-2009

Subject : Civil

Acts : Limitation Act, 1877 - Sections 5; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 22, Rules 1, 2, 3, 4, 9 and 10A; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3 and 5 - Schedule - Articles 171 and 176; Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : AIR2009SC2907; 2009(2)AWC2003(SC); JT2009(5)SC283; 2009(5)SCALE238; (2009)11SCC183:2009AIRSCW4640; 2009(3)ALLMR474

Advocate for Respondent : T.V. Ratnam and ; M. Chandrashekhar, Advs.

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Effect of abatement of an appeal, as envisaged under Order 22 Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure is involved in this appeal which arises out of a judgment and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 11 2001

Linder Frank Wolfgang Vs. Yogesh D. Shah and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-11-2001

Subject : CriminalCustoms

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 135; Gold (Control) Act, 1968 - Sections 85(1), 86 and 135(1)

Reported in : 2001VIIAD(SC)506; AIR2001SC3895; 2001CriLJ4646; 2002(79)ECC225; 2001(133)ELT16(SC); (2002)1GLR683; JT2001(7)SC459; 2001(6)SCALE232; (2001)8SCC22; 2002(1)LC41(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : T.V. Ratnam, ; K. Subba Rao, ; B. Krishna Prasad,;

D.P. Mohapatra, J.1. Leave granted.2. Shri Harjinder Singh learned counsel for the appellant has not challenged before us the conviction of the appellant under Section 135 of the Customs Act, 1962 and the sentence of simple...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 1998

State of Karnataka and ors. Vs. Kempaiah

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-27-1998

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 - Sections 2(1), 2(2), 2(8), 7, 7(2), 8, 9 to 11, 12 and 14; Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 13(1) and 13(2); Karnataka Lokayukta Rules, 1985 - Rules 2 and 4

Reported in : 1998CriLJ4070

Advocate for Respondent : Ashok K. Srivastava and ;T.V. Ratnam, Advs.

S.S. Mohammed Quadri, J.1. Leave is granted.2. In these appeals, filed by the State of Karnataka against the common judgment of the Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court dated 2nd July, 1996 in Writ Petition...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 09 2021

M.c. Mehta Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-09-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

1 ITEM NO.1 Court No.1 (Video Conferencing) SECTION PIL-W S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 13029/1985 M.C....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 24 2015

Shri Dilip K. Basu Vs. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-24-2015

Subject : Right to Information

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CRL.M.P. NO.16086 OF1997IN CRL.M.P. NO.4201 OF1997Dilip K. Basu …Petitioner Versus State of West Bengal & Ors. …Respondents WITH CRL.M.P. NO.4201 OF1997 4105 OF1999 2600 OF2000 2601...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 02 2019

m.c. Mehta Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-02-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.13029 OF1985M.C. Mehta …Petitioner(s) Versus Union of India & Ors. …Respondent(s) ORDER Deepak Gupta, J.Modern conveniences bring with them their own problems....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 04 2017

Ksb Ali Vs. State of a.p. .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-04-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : D. Mahesh Babu

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 15571-15572 OF2017(ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) NOS. 18755-18756 OF2013 KSB ALI .....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ORS. .....RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 2001

T. Aruna and ors. Vs. the Secretary, Andhra Pradesh Public Service Com ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-30-2001

Subject : Service

Acts : A.P. State Subordinate Services Rules - Rule 33; APPSC Regulation, 1963 - Regulation 12(3); Andhra Pradesh Ministerial Service Rules - Rule 5

Reported in : AIR2001SC2114; JT2001(Suppl1)SC356; 2001LabIC1790; 2001(3)SCALE673; (2001)9SCC54; 2001(2)SCT1039(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : Raju Ramachardran, Sr. Adv., ; D. Ramakrishna Reddy, ; Mrs.

Balakrishnan, J. 1. Leave granted.2. The Judgment of the Division Bench of High Court Andhra Pradesh is challenged before us. The appellants and respondents 3 to 10 are now working in different cadres such as Assistant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 20 2012

Bhau Ram Vs. Janak Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-20-2012

Subject : Civil

Acts : Himachal Pradesh Abolition of Big Landed Estates and Land Reforms Act, 1953 - Section 11; Code of Civil Procedure(CPC), 1908 - Section 151 Order 7 Rule 11 Order 22 Rule 4, Order 9 Rules 8, 9 Order 23 Rule 1(3), 4(b)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. T. V. Ratnam

P. Sathasivam, J.1) Leave granted.2) This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 20.09.2010 passed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla in R.S.A. No. 501 of 2009 whereby the High...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 2003

State of Andhra Pradesh and ors. Vs. Goverdhanlal Pitti

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-11-2003

Subject : PropertyConstitution

Acts : Land Acquisition Act - Sections 4(1), 6 and 17(4); Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 226; Rent Control Act; Rent Control and Eviction Act; Administrative Law

Reported in : AIR2003SC1941; 2003(3)AWC2417(SC); JT2003(5)SC74; 2003(2)KLT106(SC); (2003)2MLJ137(SC); RLW2003(2)SC305; 2003(3)SCALE107; (2003)4SCC739; [2003]2SCR908; (2003)2UPLBEC1667

Advocate for Respondent : V.R. Reddy, Sr. Adv. and ; D. Bharathi Reddy, Adv.

Dharamadhikari, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by the State of Andhra Pradeshand its Authorities against the Division Bench judgment dated22.7.1999 passed by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in Writ AppealNo. 652 of 1999. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial