Advanced Search Results
K. Chandrashekara Naik and anr. Vs. Narayana and anr.
Karnataka
Oct-11-1974
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110, 110A to 110F and 111-A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 41, Rule 22; Karnataka Motor Vehicles Rules, 1963 - Rules 263 and 363; Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1956; Requisition and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952 - Sections 11 and 22; Trade Marks Act - Sections 76 and 77; Defence of India Act, 1939 - Sections 19(1); Limitation Act, 1963
AIR1975Kant18; 1974(2)KarLJ433
B.P. Holla and ;Udaya Holla, Advs.
1. The Division Bench of this Court which heard the appeal, has referred to the Full Bench the following question:--In an appeal under Section 110-D of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, are cross-objections by a respondent...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMammunhi Beary Vs. Neelamma and anr.
Karnataka
Aug-06-1975
Property
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 63 and 63-A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 35 and 100
AIR1976Kant21; 1975(2)KarLJ300
T.S. Krishna Bhat, Adv. for ;U.L Narayana Rao, Adv.
ORDER1. This appeal arises out of the suit for redemption filed by the respondents. Respondent 1 is the wife of respondent 2. Respondent No 2 executed a usufructuary mortgage of the plaint 'A' schedule properties, which...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskV. Narayana Bhat Vs. E. Subbanna Bhat
Karnataka
Dec-02-1974
Civil
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 182, 211 and 392; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 107
AIR1975Kant162; ILR1975KAR1000; 1975(1)KarLJ506
T.S. Krishna Bhat, Adv. for ;U.L. Narayana Rao, Adv.
1. The appellant is the plaintiff. The suit was for recovery of damages of Rs. 1,000 for defamation'. The defendant-respondent presented a complaint on 28-11-1964 to the Station House Officer, Puttur Police Station, imputing an offence...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
B. Padmavathi Rai Vs. Parvathiamma
Karnataka
Sep-15-1975
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 5, Rules 9 and 10 - Order 9, Rule 13
ILR1976KAR119
T.S. Krishna Bhat, Adv.
1. The suit filed by the respondent for recovery of the balance of unpaid money under a registered Assignment Deed was decreed ex parte on the ground that the defendant had refused to take the summons....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS. Sanjiva Shetty Vs. Anantha and ors.
Karnataka
Mar-26-1976
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 95(2), 96, 110-B and 110-D; Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1969
ILR1976KAR1120; 1976(1)KarLJ430
P. Ganapathy Bhat, ;S.V. Subramanyam, ;K. Rajesh Prabhu and ;K. Suryanarayana Rao, Advs. and ;T.S. Krishna Bhat, Adv. for ;U.L. Narayan Rao, Adv.
Venkataswami, J.1. These are two appeals under Section 110-D of the Motor Vehicles Act and can he disposed of together by a common judgment. They are directed against a common order made by the Motor Accidents...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMinIn Kamel Alfanso and ors. Vs. Ramakant Vinayak Gaonkar and ors.
Karnataka
Feb-08-1977
Property
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 82
AIR1977Kant135; 1977(1)KarLJ196
T.S. Ramachandra and ;T.S. Krishna Bhat, Advs.
1. This second appeal has come up before us upon a reference made by Venkataramiah. J.2 The facts, which are not now in dispute, are these: The appellants are legal representatives of one Kamil B. Alfanso....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Karnataka Bank Ltd. and ors. Vs. the Secretary, Govt. of India, Mi ...
Karnataka
Jan-04-2001
Direct Taxation
(2002)174CTR(Kar)418
ORDERTirath Singh Takur, J.The petitioners are banking companies carrying on their business in the State of Karnataka. They have in these petitions called in question the validity of notices issued by the concerned Income Tax Officers...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›