Advanced Search Results
Xs Financial Services Ltd. and Megapro Investments Pvt. Ltd. Vs. N. De ...
Chennai
Jan-31-2003
Civil
Original Side Rules - Order 36, Rule 1
AIR2003Mad369; (2003)1MLJ613
T. Ramalingam, Adv.
D. Murugesan, J. 1. This Original Side Appeal is directed against the order of the learned single Judge dated 03.12.1997 made in Application No. 2668 of 1997 in C.S. No. 269 of 1996. 2. The appellants...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Wealth Tax Vs. Smt. Muthu Zulaikha
Chennai
Jul-21-2000
Direct Taxation
[2001]245ITR800(Mad)
N. K. Jain, Actg. C. J.The matter has been referred to us by a Division Bench of this court, before which the tax reference came up for hearing, as it was not inclined to agree with...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Wealth Tax Vs. V.T. Somasundaram L/H of V.S. Thiagaraj ...
Chennai
Nov-20-2000
Direct Taxation
(2001)165CTR(Mad)454
R. Jayasimha Babu, J.:Two questions are before us at the instance of the revenue . The assessment years are 1968-69 and 1970-71. The first question concerns the extent to which the assessee can claim the benefit...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
In Re: Alamelou
Chennai
Aug-21-1963
Criminal
1965CriLJ224
Anantanarayanan, J.1. This is a special criminal appeal preferred by one Alamelou, a young woman aged about 19, who has been convicted by the Court assizes of Karikal for the offence; of murder or assassination of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Management of Tamil Nadu Mercantile Bank Ltd. Represented by Its C ...
Chennai
Mar-10-1992
Labour and Industrial
(1992)2MLJ435
ORDERSrinivasan, J.1. The question to be considered in these revision petitions is whether the City Civil Court, Madras, has got jurisdiction to entertain the suit filed by the respondent herein. The relevant facts are as follows:The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM. Sekar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Rep. by Senior Superintendent of Pos ...
Chennai
Jun-10-2008
Service
Gramin Dak Sevaks (Conduct and Employment) Rules, 2001; Extra-Departmental Agents (Conduct and Service) Rules, 1964 - Rules 3 and 16; GDS (Conduct and Employment) Rules, 2001; Service Rules; Department of Posts, Gramin Dak Sevaks (Conduct and Employment) Rules, 2001 - Rule 4; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 21
(2008)5MLJ1158
K. Balachandran, Adv. for Respondents 1 and 2
ORDERK. Chandru, J.1. Heard the arguments of learned Counsels for private parties and the learned Assistant Central Government Standing Counsel representing the Union of India and perused the records.2. In all these twenty writ petitions, the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Ajay Singh and Others
Supreme Court of India
Nov-02-1992
Criminal
Commissions of Enquiry Act, 1952 - Sections 2, 3(3), 6, 7, 8A(2), 9, 10 and 11; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 14, 16 and 21; Constitution of India - Article 136; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 7
AIR1993SC825; JT1992(6)SC235; 1992(3)SCALE45; (1993)1SCC302; [1992]Supp2SCR274
ORDERJ.S. Verma, J.1. The petitioner State of Madhya Pradesh in both these petitions seeks leave to appeal under Article 136 of the Constitution against the common judgment and order dated 8.5.1992 of the High Court of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNaushad Ali and Another Vs. Regional Transport Officer, Haveri and Ano ...
Karnataka
Apr-16-1998
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2(48), 46, 52, 58, 79, 113, 115 and 194; A.P. Motor Vehicles Rules
II(1998)ACC689; ILR1998KAR3051; 1998(4)KarLJ453
Sri S.N. Aswathanarayana, High Court Government Adv.
Y. Bhaskar Rao, J.1. These two writ appeals are filed to set aside the order of the learned Single Judge dated 3-2-1998. Since common questions of law arise for consideration in both appeals and hence they...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Wealth-tax Vs. V.T. Venkateswaran
Chennai
Apr-29-1994
Direct Taxation
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 5(1) and 27(1)
[1995]212ITR289(Mad)
R. Meenakshisundaram, Adv.
Gulab C. Gupta, J. 1. This is a reference under section 27(1) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 ('the Act', for short), requesting this court to decide the following question of law : 'Whether, on the facts...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN.A.S. Ansari and A. Zinathunnissa Vs. T. Ramalingam Rep. by His Power ...
Chennai
Apr-04-2003
Commercial
Evidence Act - Sections 92; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100
AIR2003Mad286
E. Padmanabhan, J.1. The defendants, who are unsuccessful before the two courts below are the appellants in this second appeal. 2. Heard Mr. V. Krishnan, learned counsel appearing for the appellants. For convenience, the parties will...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »