Advanced Search Results

S. Ram Kumar Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Ministry of Finance, Department ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Patents Act, 1970; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 111, 128, 128A, 128A(4A), 129 and 129A; National Tax Tribunal Act, 2005 - Sections 15; Motor Vehicles Act; Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act - Sections 9; Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act; Intellectual Property Rights (Imported Goods) Enforcement Rules, 2007 - Rules 3, 3(2), 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 11(1); Constitution of India - Article 226, 226(2) and 227

Reported in : (2009)6MLJ990

Advocate for Respondent : T.R. Senthilkumar, Standing Counsel for Respondents 1 and 2 in W.P. No. 9934/2009 and Respondents 1, 2 and 4 in W.P. Nos. 9935, 10264, 10432 and 10730/2009, ;P. Saravanan, Adv. for 3rd Respondent in W

ORDERN. Paul Vasanthakumar, J.1. The prayer in these writ petitions are to quash the orders dated 18.5.2009 and 20.5.2009, passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Customs, Chennai, insofar as W.P. Nos. 9934 and 9935 of 2009...

Meera Impex Vs. Cestat

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : [2010]25STT302

Advocate for Respondent : T.R. Senthilkumar and; K. Ramakrishna Reddy, Advs.

M.M. Sundresh, J.1. In view of the common issues involved in all the writ petitions and also in view of the fact that a common order has been passed which has been challenged in these writ...

Areva T and D Lightning Arresters Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly Known as Alstom ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 2, 2(26), 3, 9, 9A, 19A, 35, 40, 42, 45, 45(1), 45(2), 57 and 75A; Pondicherry (Extension of Laws) Act, 1964 - Sections 3 and 5; Pondicherry (Extension of Laws) Act, 1968 - Sections 3 and 5, 6 and 6(1); Indian Companies Act, 1913; Indian Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 644; Pondicherry Administration Act, 1962; Union Territory Act; Constitution of India - Articles 23, 226 and 239A

Reported in : (2009)5MLJ622

Advocate for Respondent : T. Murugesan, Sr. Govt. Pleader (Pondy)

ORDERR. Banumathi, J.1. Petitioner company seeks writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to quash the Proceedings of the Respondent in No. 9652/Rev-C3/2003 dated 04.12.2006 and direct the Respondent to refund the stamp duty of Rs. 44,80,000/- as per...

Marg Constructions Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :12. 02.2014 Coram The Honourable Mrs.Justice CHITRA VENKATARAMAN and The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM T.C.A.No.977 of 2006 and T.C.M.P.No.1560 of 2006 MARG Constructions Ltd., 501, Apex Chambers, 20,...

Inderchand D. Kochar and Others Vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Inco ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

(Prayer: Tax Case Appeals filed under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961 against the orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'C' Bench dated 23/09/2015 in ITA Nos.1976/Mds/2014, 1978/Mds/2014, 1974/Mds/2014, 1975/Mds/2014 and 1977/Mds/2014.) S....

Ashok Kumar Sethi Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

(Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bench A , Chennai in I.T.SSA.No.95/MDS/2003 for the assessment year : Block period 1.4.1990 to...

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Anglo French Textiles Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 14B; Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 37(1) and 256(1)

Reported in : [2002]254ITR314(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : C.V. Rajan, Standing Counsel in T.C. No. 154 of 1984, ;T.R. Senthilkumar, Adv. for Utama Reddy and ;R. Ravi Raja, Advs. in T.C. No. 153 of 1984

R. Jayasimha Babu, J. 1. The assessee is a company whose industrial undertaking was nationalised. The Act under which it was taken over provided for compensation in a limited sum to be distributed to the classes...

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. India Meters Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 41(1); Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 101 and 391

Reported in : [2003]262ITR549(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : T.R. Senthilkumar, Adv. for ;Uttam Reddy, Adv.

N.V. Balasubramanian, J.1. Tax Case No. 436 of 1999 is a reference under the Income-tax Act, 1961, and Tax Cases Nos. 35 and 36 of 1998 are references made under the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964.2....

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. India Meters Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391; Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964 - Sections 4; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 41 and 41(1)

Reported in : (2003)183CTR(Mad)283

Advocate for Respondent : T.R. Senthilkumar, Adv. for ;M. Uttam Reddy, Adv.

N.V. Balasubramanian, J.1. TC No. 436 of 1999 is a reference under the IT Act, 1961, and TC Nos. 35 and 36 of 1998, are references made under Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964.2. We first take...

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Madras Fertilisers Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 10(6), 40A(5) and 154

Reported in : (2003)184CTR(Mad)93; [2003]261ITR673(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : T.R. Senthilkumar, Adv.

R. Jayasimha Babu, J. 1. The questions referred to us at the instance of the Revenue are,'1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal is right in law in...