Advanced Search Results

Western Coalfields Ltd. Through the Chief General Manager Vs. the Stat ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Coal Mines (Nationalization) Act, 1973 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 4, 4(2), 5, 5(1), 5(2), 6, 10(1), 11, 11(1), 11(2), 64, 64(4), 68 and 69; Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 3(1), 9, 9(1), 10, 10 (1), 10(2), 11, 11(1) and 11(2); Land Acquisition Act; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 5(1), 7(2), 13 and 18; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Rules; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1948; International Airports Authority Act, 1971 - Sections 12, 12 (1), 12(3), 21 to 24 , 31, 33 and 34; Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 - Sections 123, 124 and 127A(2); Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act. 1956 - Sections 136; Madhya Pradesh Panchayats

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR414; 2009(111)BomLR502

Advocate for Respondent : Bharati Dangre, Additional Government Pleader, ;T.R. Kankale, Asst. Govt. Pleaders, ;D.B. Patel and ;R.N. Kothari, Advs.

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. Common question involved in all these Writ Petitions is, .whether State Government can levy and demand any sum as amount of nonagricultural assessment from Petitioners WCL.... Petitioner- Company is incorporated under the Companies...

Murlidhar S/O Bhimraoji Sable and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and an ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 11, 12, 12(1), 12(2), 18, 18(1), 18(2), 18(2)(1), 18(3), 19(2) and 31; Limitation Act - Sections 29(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 6, Rule 17; Constitution of India - Article 226; Land Acquisition Rules

Reported in : 2008(6)ALLMR200; 2008(6)MhLj838

Advocate for Respondent : T.R. Kankale, AGP

S.R. Dongaonkar, J.1. The appellants challenge the judgment and order passed by Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, in Land Acquisition Case No. 110/97, dated 17th July, 2003, by which he dismissed the reference of the appellants...

Sunil S/O Manikrao Aparadhe Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Maharashtra Municipalities, Nagar Panchayat and Industrial Township Act 1965 - Sections 308, 308(1) and 308(3)

Reported in : 2006(2)ALLMR207; 2006(2)MhLj185

Advocate for Respondent : T.R. Kankale, Assistant Govt. Pleader for respondents No. 1 and 2

D.D. Sinha, J.1. Rule, made returnable forthwith by the consent of the parties.2. Heard Mr. Rajeev Madkholkar, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. T.R. Kankale, learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondents No. 1 and 2 and...

Pralhad Vitthalrao Bhusari Vs. New Ideal Education Society and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981 - Rule 6

Reported in : 2005(2)BomCR48

Advocate for Respondent : K.V. Thomas, Adv., h/f., ;Masood Sharif, Adv. for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and ;T.R. Kankale, A.G.P., for respondent No. 3

Dharmadhikari B.P., J.1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner employee challenges the order of termination issued by respondent No. 1 management terminating him w.e.f. 7-4-1989 and the judgment delivered...

Basawesar Son of Chandrashekhar Tambakhe Vs. the Gram Panchayat and or ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958 - Section 124, 176; Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925 - Section 73 (1) (b), 75,; Maharashtra Village Panchayats Taxes and Fess Rules, 1960 - Rule 7, 350-A and 243, 3, 4

1. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner, who is citizen of India and resident of village Silewada within the jurisdiction of respondent no. 1 Gram Panchayat, has challenged Resolution...

Basawesar Son of Chandrashekhar Tambakhe. Vs. Silewada, Tahsil Saoner, ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Maharashtra Village Panchayats Taxes and Fess Rules, 1960 - Rule 7, 3, 4; Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958 - Section 124 (1), 176 (2) (26),; Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925 - Section 73(1)(b), 75,

Oral Judgment (Per B. P. Dharmadhikari, J) 1. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner, who is citizen of India and resident of village Silewada within the jurisdiction of respondent...

Ramesh S/O Shrikrishna Dhore and ors. Vs. the Commissioner of State Ex ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Commercial

Reported in : (1996)98BOMLR837

V.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. The petitioner herein challenge the concurrent orders passed by the Collector, Chandrapur and the appellate order passed by the respondent No. 1 Commissioner of State Excise. By the instant orders firstly the Collector...

Ravindra and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra, Through Its Secretary, ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. R.N. Ghuge, Shri. Sonone

Oral Judgment: (B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.) 1. Heard Shri P.B. Patil, learned Counsel for the petitioners, Shri T.R. Kankale, learned A.G.P. for respondent nos.1 and 2, Shri R.N. Ghuge, learned Counsel for respondent nos. 4 to 12,...

Rameshchandra S/O Shankarlal Saboo (Dr.) Vs. State of Maharashtra and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 - Sections 55A and 55B; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2003(1)ALLMR118; 2003(1)BomCR126; 2002(4)MhLj892

Advocate for Respondent : T.R. Kankale, A.G.P. for respondent No. 1, ;A. Joshi, Adv. for respondent No. 4; ;N.W. Sambre, Adv. for respondent Nos. 6 to 8 and ;Abhay Sambre, Adv. for respondent No. 9

R.G. Deshpande, J. 1. The petitioner has approached this court challenging the order passed by Shri Sunil Tatkare - the then State Minister for Urban Development Department, Government of Maharashtra, whereby the present petitioner Shri Saboo...

Shravan Vithoba Dekate and ors. Vs. Additional Commissioner, Nagpur Di ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 - Sections 195, 201, 202, 210 and 210(1)

Reported in : 2005(1)ALLMR27; 2005(1)BomCR823; 2004(4)MhLj625

Advocate for Respondent : T.R. Kankale, A.G.P. for respondent No. 1 and ;S.P. Palshikar, Adv. for respondent No. 3

B.R. Gavai, J.1. By way of present petition, the petitioners challenge the order dated 30-5-1989 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Nagpur Division, Nagpur in Revision Case No. MRC-81/Khapa-1/85-86 vide which the Additional Commissioner has set aside...