Advanced Search Results
Jageram Malik Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Mumbai
Aug-12-1953
Criminal
1955CriLJ974
ORDER1. This is a petition under Article 228 of the Constitution.2. The petitioner was a member of the Madhya Pradesh Police Force having joined as a Sub-Inspector of Police on 1-1-1924. He was confirmed in that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM. Gopalkrishna Naidu Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Mumbai
Oct-19-1951
Criminal
1952CriLJ845
ORDER1. This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution.2. The relevant facts are briefly these. The applicant was appointed on the 1st January 1924 as an Overseer in the Upper Subordinate Engineering service of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRama Rao and ors. Vs. Shantibai and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Sep-24-1976
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 9 - Order 17, Rules 2 and 3
AIR1977MP222; 1978MPLJ20
N.S. Kale and ;M.L. Jaiswal, Advs. for Non-applicant No. 1
Dwivedi and Verma, JJ.1. The several questions referred for decision to this Bench require substantially answers to two questions, namely,-- (i) the comparative scope of Rules 2 and 3 of Order 17 of the Code of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sheoshankar Vs. State Govt. of Madhya Pradesh and ors.
Mumbai
Apr-18-1951
Criminal
1951CriLJ1140
Hidayatullah, J.1. This is an application purporting to be under Article 226 of the Constitution for the following reliefs:(i) A writ of Mandamus directing the respondents not to enforce against the petitioner the Central Provinces &...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohd. Yousuf and ors. Vs. Smt. Jyotsana Ben and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Feb-14-1996
LimitationCivil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rule 58(2) and 58(4)
AIR1996MP197
Ravish Agarwal, Adv.
S.C. Pandey, J.1. This is an appeal against the order dated 12-1-90 filed by the objectors under Order 21, Rule 58(4) of the Code of Civil Procedure. The 1st Additional District Judge to the Court of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHiralal Sutwala and ors. Vs. the State
Mumbai
Sep-15-1952
Criminal
1953CriLJ481
ORDERSinha, C.J.1. This order will also govern the decision of Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 45. of 1951.2. The applicant in this application, Hiralal, is being prosecuted along with Harishankar and his wife Shrimati Gomti Devi, who...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShyamcharan Sharma Vs. Dharamdas
Supreme Court of India
Dec-04-1979
Tenancy
Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 - Sections 12, 12(1), 12(3), 13(1), 13(6) and 13(5)
AIR1980SC587; 1980MPLJ325(SC); (1980)2SCC151; [1980]2SCR334; 1980(12)LC117(SC)
T.P. Naik and ; S.K. Gambhir, Advs.
O. Chinnappa Reddy, J.1. The respondent-landlord sought eviction of the appellant-tenant from the suit premises on two grounds: (i) failure to pay arrears of rent of Rs. 158.25 despite service of notice of demand and (ii)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskL.M. Wakhare Vs. the State
Madhya Pradesh
Dec-29-1953
Civil
Madhya Pradesh Official Languages Act, 1950 - Sections 3(2); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 226, 227, 245, 254, 343, 345 and 350; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 137; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 558
AIR1959MP208
T.P. Naik, Addl. Govt. Pleader
ORDER1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution calls in question the validity of the Notification No. 587-1305-XXVII, dated 13-8-1953, which has been issued by the Madhya Pradesh Government prescribing the languages to be used...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChaitanya Kumar Adatiya Vs. Smt. Sushila Dixit and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Jul-17-1975
Election
Conduct of Elections Rules, 1961 - Rules 2(2), 38, 38(1), 38(2), 40 and 56(2); Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 123(1), 123(2) and 123(4)
AIR1975SC1718; (1976)3SCC97; 1975(7)LC537(SC)
T.P. Naik, ; S.K. Gambhir, Advs.
A.C. Gupta, J.1. On March 13, 1972 the first respondent was declared elected to Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly from Hoshangabad constituency defeating three other contestants who are respectively respondents Nos. 2, 3 and 4. The first...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Public Prosecutor Vs. Kota Venkata Subramma and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Jan-19-1968
Criminal
1969CriLJ1074
Kondaiah, J.1. This batch of Criminal Appeals by the State have been preferred against the orders of acquittal passed by the Courts below boding that the provisions of Section 10(7) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »