Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: t murugesan · Page 1 of about 68 results (0.068 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 22 2001

Pondicherry Co-operative Milk Producers, Union Ltd. Vs. Registrar of C ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-22-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Pondicherry Co-operative Societies Act, 1972

Reported in : 2001CriLJ3262

Advocate for Respondent : T. Murugesan, Sr. Counsel and ;Natarajan, AGP

ORDERE. Padmanabhan, J.1. The above two contempt applications are complaint and counter complaints of contempt and in both the contempt applications, this Court had ordered notice to the respondents on 4-1-2000 returnable by eight weeks.2. As...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 11 2006

M.M. Dinesh Vs. the Union Territory of Pondicherry Through the Chief S ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-11-2006

Subject : CommercialConstitution

Acts : Pondicherry Municipalities Act, 1973 - Sections 35, 104, 349, 349(3), 350, 352, 353, 355 and 430(3); ;Government of Union Territories Act, 1963 - Sections 2, 46 and 46(1); ;Pondicherry Municipalities (Places of Public Resort and Entertainments), Rules 1980 - Rules 2, 2(1), 26(1), 26(2) and 233; ;Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 166, 166(1), 239 and 309

Reported in : AIR2006Mad166; (2006)2MLJ212

Advocate for Respondent : T. Murugesan, Government Pleader-cum-Public Prosecutor

ORDERV. Dhanapalan, J.1. The petitioner submits that he has filed an application before the third respondent for grant of Municipal Licence for the purpose of holding Indian Classical Dance at Hotel Al Rasheed, Citadel at Door...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 05 2009

Areva T and D Lightning Arresters Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly Known as Alstom ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : May-05-2009

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 2, 2(26), 3, 9, 9A, 19A, 35, 40, 42, 45, 45(1), 45(2), 57 and 75A; Pondicherry (Extension of Laws) Act, 1964 - Sections 3 and 5; Pondicherry (Extension of Laws) Act, 1968 - Sections 3 and 5, 6 and 6(1); Indian Companies Act, 1913; Indian Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 644; Pondicherry Administration Act, 1962; Union Territory Act; Constitution of India - Articles 23, 226 and 239A

Reported in : (2009)5MLJ622

Advocate for Respondent : T. Murugesan, Sr. Govt. Pleader (Pondy)

ORDERR. Banumathi, J.1. Petitioner company seeks writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to quash the Proceedings of the Respondent in No. 9652/Rev-C3/2003 dated 04.12.2006 and direct the Respondent to refund the stamp duty of Rs. 44,80,000/- as per...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 08 2006

Pandurangan Vs. the Sub Registrar,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-08-2006

Subject : Property

Acts : Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 6, 16A, 21, 25, 34, 34(3), 35, 35(1), 36, 37, 38, 51, 52, 55, 57, 58 to 61, 63, 64, 65, 66, 68, 69, 69(1), 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 83 and 88(2); Pondicherry Registration Rules, 1969 - Rule 54

Reported in : AIR2007Mad159; 2007(1)CTC641; (2006)4MLJ1440

Advocate for Respondent : T. Murugesan, Sr. Counsel, ;Government Pleader for ;K.K. Sasidharan, Government Pleader

ORDERV. Ramasubramanian, J.1. The petitioner, who claims to have entered into an agreement on 9.7.2004 for the purchase of an immovable property in R.S. No. 118/1 in Pethuchettipatti Village, Karuvadikuppam Revenue Village, situate within the jurisdiction...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 11 2006

M.M. Dinesh Vs. Pondicherry Municipality Represented by Its Commission ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-11-2006

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Pondicherry Municipalities Act - Sections 35, 349, 350, 352 and 430(3); Pondicherry Municipalities Rules - Rule 233; Pondicherry Municipalities (Places of Public Resort and Entertainment) Rules, 1950 - Rule 2; Pondicherry Municipalities Regulations; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 239

Reported in : 2006(1)CTC585

Advocate for Respondent : T. Murugesan, Govt. Pleader -cum- Public Prosecutor

ORDERV. Dhanapalan, J.1. By consent of the counsel on either side, the writ petition itself is taken up for disposal.2. The petitioner, in support of the relief asked for, has submitted that he is a businessman...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 20 2004

Belmaks Metal Works Vs. the Member Secretary, Pondichery Pollution Con ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-20-2004

Subject : Environment

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2005)1MLJ441

Advocate for Respondent : T. Murugesan, Government Pleader for U.T. of Pondichery/Senior Counsel

ORDERMarkandey Katju, C.J. 1. The petitioner prays for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for quashing the dated 22-11-2004 passed by the respondent and to grant 'Air Consent Order' under Sec. 21 of the Air...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 09 2007

P.V. Bose Vs. the Vice Chairman, Bharathiar Palkalaikoodam,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-09-2007

Subject : Service

Acts : Societies Registration Act, 1986; University Grants Commission Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 12B, 14 and 26(1); University Grants Commission Rules - Rule 7; University's Academic Ordinances; University Grants Commission Regulation; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2007(2)CTC480; (2007)3MLJ387

Advocate for Respondent : T. Murugesan, Government Pleader for R-1 and R-2 in W.P. No. 5736 of 2000 and R-1 in W.P. Nos. 6 of 2000, 29876 and 29877 of 2002, ;G. Masilamani Sr. Counsel for G.M. Associates for R-9, 14, 17, 18 t

ORDERR. Banumathi, J.1.1. In W.P. No. 5736 of 2000 challenge is to the induction of teaching staff, granting them one time relaxation and giving them fitment in Scale of pay as per University Grants Commission (for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 2003

Sapthagiri Educational Trust rep. by Its Chairman, M. Jothiprakasam, V ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-28-2003

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2003)2MLJ358

Advocate for Respondent : T. Murugesan, Govt. Pleader

ORDERK.P. Sivasubramaniam, J.1. The above three writ petitions involve consideration of common issues and hence taken up together.2. W.P. No. 32296 of 2002 is filed by a Private Unaided Non Minority Institution, established at Pondicherry, seeking...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 2002

Dr. R. Shakila and ors. Vs. Dr. S. Krishnaraj and ors. Etc.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-20-2002

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR2002Mad307; (2002)1MLJ714

Advocate for Respondent : T.P. Manoharan, ;T. Murugesan, Govt. Pleader and ;K.R. Ramesh Kumar, Adv.

B. Subhashan Reddy, C.J. 1. These two Writ Appeal Nos. 1862 and 1924 of 2001 are preferred against the orders of the learned single Judge allowing the writ petition filed by the respondents 1 and 2...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 14 2002

Dakshinamoorthy and ors. Vs. Union of Territory of Pondicherry

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-14-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Passport Act, 1867; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 148, 149, 302, 307, 341, 427, 447 and 448; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) 1973 - Sections 164, 207, 306, 313, 313(1) and 313(4); Constitution of India - Articles 14 19(1), 21 and 22(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 342, 342(1) and 364

Reported in : 2002CriLJ2359

Advocate for Respondent : T. Murugesan, Sr. Public Prosecutor

ORDERC. Nagappan, J.1. The petitioners are accused in S.C. No. 3 of 1999 on the file of Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pondicherry and they seek for setting aside the order passed in Cri. M.P. No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial