Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: t gandhi · Page 1 of about 12 results (0.066 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 19 2013

Kshatriya Vidhyasala Matriculation Higher Secondary School Vs. Governm ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-19-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :19. 07.2013 Coram The HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.BANUMATHI and The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM W.P. Nos. 1458 to 1463, 1821, 2422, 2826, 3283 to 3285, 3662, 4586, 4587,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 17 2026

S.DAISY Vs The Commissioner of Police

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-17-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 17.02.2026CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA W.P.(Crl.)No.330 of 2026 and WPMP (Crl) Nos.95 & 96 of 2026 1.S.Daisy 2.S.Amalanathan 3.S.Jhansi 4.G.Arun Kumar ... Petitioners Vs. 3.Victor 4.Chithra ......

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 13 2004

Shri Cutchi Visa Oswal Derawasi JaIn Pathshala Through Its Chairman Vi ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-13-2004

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Sections 2(18) and 22

Reported in : 2005(1)ALLMR484; 2005(1)BomCR105

Advocate for Respondent : Navin Parekh and ;Z.A. Jariwala, Advs., i/b., Thakore Jariwala & Associates

Daga V.C., J.1. This appeal at the instance of Shri Cutchi Visa Oswal Derawasi Jain Pathshala ('Pathshala Trust' for short) is directed against the order dated 17th June, 2004 passed by the City Civil Court at...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 06 2004

Prem Nath Malhotra and ors. Vs. Lokesh Malhotra

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : Dec-06-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 1, Rule 10(2) - Order 6, Rule 17

Reported in : 2005(1)JKJ6

Advocate for Respondent : P.N. Goja, Adv.

S.N. Jha, C.J.1. This civil revision by the defendants is directed against an order by which the court below allowed amendment of the plaint and addition of party defendant.2. The plaintiff-respondent instituted civil suit No. 31...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 10 2007

Krishnamoorthy Vs. Parasuraman,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-10-2007

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act - Sections 5; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 115 - Order 22, Rules 3, 4 and 10

Reported in : 2007(2)CTC538

Advocate for Respondent : T. Gandhi, Adv. for R2 and R3

ORDERP. Jyothimani, J.1. The second plaintiff in the suit is the revision petitioner, which is filed under Section 115 of Code of Civil Procedure. The revision arises from the order passed by the learned Trial Judge...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 20 2012

Dr. Razia Rep. by Power Agent Dharbar Ali. Vs. Kathija Bi.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-20-2012

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure,(CPC) 1908 - Order 23 Rule 1; Constitution of India - Articles 227

Advocate for Respondent : Ms. T. Gandhi, Adv.

Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decreetal order of the Principal District Munsif Court at Ulundurpet dated 21.07.2011 made in I.A. No: 1863 of 2010 in O.S....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 07 1985

Mohamadbhai Chotubhai Vs. Additional Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-07-1985

Subject : Miscellaneous

Reported in : (1986)LC396Tri(Mum.)bai

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. Pattekar

1. Two Revision Applications filed before the Government of India against the Order No. 630-31 of 1980 dated 5th August, 1980, passed by the Central Board of Excise & Customs, statutorily stood transferred to the Tribunal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 27 1959

East Asiatic Company (India) (Private) Ltd. Vs. Its Workmen

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-27-1959

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10(2) and 39

Reported in : (1960)ILLJ383Bom

Acts/Rules/Orders: Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10(2) and 39 AWARD1. This industrial dispute between the East Asiatic Company (India) (Private), Ltd., Bombay, and the workmen employed under it has been referred to me as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 04 2006

Ranchhoddas Karsondas Rangwala and Prakash Ranchhoddas Rangwalla Vs. N ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-04-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 18

Reported in : 2007(1)BomCR147

Advocate for Respondent : J. Reis and ;Denzil D'Mello, Advs. for Respondents 1 to 7

A.M. Khanwilkar, J.1. This Contempt Petition was disposed of on August 20, 1996. Against the said decision, Petitioners carried the matter in Appeal before the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court by order dated July 21, 1997...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 04 1988

P.T. Gandhi Vs. Manjulaben Maganlal Shah (Smt.) and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-04-1988

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 31; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 114; Bombay Rent, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Rules, 1948 - Rules 5, 7 and 8; Presidency Small Causes Courts Act - Sections 9

Reported in : 1988(3)BomCR191

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Tijoriwalla, ; T.S. Tijoriwalla and ; J.J. Jadeja, Advs.

C.S. Dharmadhikari, J.1. Respondent Landlords Smt. Manjulaben Maganlal Shah and Smt. Nanbai Kalyanji filed a suit against petitioner tenant P.T. Gandhi for possession of the premises on the ground among others that the said premises were...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial