Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: t a goud · Page 1 of about 35 results (0.063 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 03 2006

G. Rajendranath Goud Vs. State of A.P. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-03-2006

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1966 - Sections 77(1); Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments (Amendment) Act, 1987 - Sections 3(1), 6, 15(1), 16, 17, 17(1), 19, 20, 77(1), 17(3), 82, 87(1), 87(3), 88 and 153; Madras Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1951; Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Act; Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 17, 19, 20, 75, 82, 87, 87(1), 107 and 123; Evidence Act, 1872; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908; Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments (Appointment of Trustees) Rules, 1987; Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Wakf Regulation, 1349; Constitution of India - Ar

Reported in : 2006(1)ALD705; 2006(2)ALT115

Advocate for Respondent : Govt. Pleader for Endowments for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2, ;M. Vidyasagar, Adv. for the Respondent No. 3 and ;T. Amarnath Goud, Adv. for the Respondent Nos. 5

ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.1. The petitioner is son of one Jagannath Goud. The respondents 3, 4 and 5 are his brothers. All of them are grandsons of one Jangaiah. He was a great devotee of Lord Venkateswara....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 20 2005

Yada Laxmi Vs. A.P. State Co-operative Bank and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-20-2005

Subject : Service

Acts : Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 60; Co-operative Societies Act, 1964 - Sections 116C

Reported in : 2006(1)ALD733; [2006(108)FLR1178]

Advocate for Respondent : A.H. Ramakrishna Rao, Adv. for Respondent No. 1 and ;T. Amarnath Goud, Adv. for Respondent No. 2

ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The husband of the petitioner was employed as an Attender in the 2nd respondent-Bank. He died on 27.1.2004, while in service. Thereupon, the petitioner filed an application with a prayer to provide...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 10 2020

M/s Ray Constructions Ltd., Vs. The State Of Karnataka,

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on : Mar-10-2020

Subject : Land Acquisition

R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE10H DAY OF MARCH, 2020 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO.100018/2015 BETWEEN1 M/S RAY CONSTRUCTIONS LTD., A PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY INCORPORATED...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 24 2014

Bollikonda Ram Vs. The Nalgonda District Co-Operative Centr

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-24-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO WRIT PETITION No.35164 of 2014 24-11-2014 Bollikonda Ramaiah.Petitioner The Nalgonda District Co-operative Central Bank Limited, Nalgonda and otheRs.Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sr.M.Venkat Ram Reddy Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 and 2:...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 2005

DolphIn Bar and Restaurant Vs. Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-18-2005

Subject : Excise

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Indian Liquor and Foreign Liquor Rules, 1970 - Rule 29

Reported in : 2005(2)ALD459; 2005(2)ALT711

Advocate for Respondent : M.R.K. Choudary, Adv. and ;Government Pleader

L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. Certain common questions of fact and law are involved in these two writ petitions. Hence, they are disposed of through a common judgment.2. Petitioner in W.P. No. 209 of 2005 is an...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 27 2000

K. Umeshwar Vs. Electronics Corporation of India, Hyd. and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-27-2000

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 29, 30, 32 and 33; Legal Practitioners Act, 1879; Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 3, Rule 2

Reported in : 2000(4)ALD184; 2000(3)ALT791

ORDER1. The petitioner in this writ petition prays for issuance of a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent Corporation in 'not conducting the enquiry against the 5th respondent which will reveal why the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 27 2003

Ramya Wines Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-27-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Andhra Pradesh Indian Liquor and Foreign Rules, 1970 - Rules 28, 30 and 66A; Andhra Pradesh Excise Act, 1968 - Sections 17 and 28; Andhra Pradesh Indian Liquor and Foreign (Amendment) Rules, 1998 - Rule 2

Reported in : 2003(4)ALD519; 2003(5)ALT780

ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.1. All the petitioners are holders of Form IL-24 licence issued under the A.P. Indian Liquor and Foreign Liquor Rules, 1970. By virtue of the licence granted to them, they are permitted to sell...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 18 2003

Toddy Co-operative Society Vs. Superintendent of Prohibition and Excis ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-18-2003

Subject : Excise

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Excise Act, 1968 - Sections 31(2)

Reported in : 2003(6)ALD32; 2003(5)ALT475

Advocate for Respondent : Government Pleader

ORDERC.Y. Somayajulu, J.1. Heard the Counsel for petitioner and the Government Pleader for Excise.2. Petitioner, which is carrying business in toddy, has licence for three shops and one depot. On 23-1-2003 the Task Force, Hyderabad surprised...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 28 2005

Y. Venkateswar Rao and ors. Vs. Prohibition and Excise Superintendent ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-28-2005

Subject : Excise

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 263 and 263(1); Hyderabad Municipal Corporations Act, 1955 - Sections 516, 521, 521(1), 528, 539, 596, 622, 622(2), 623 and 625; Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation Act, 1979; Andhra Pradesh Excise Act, 1968; Andhra Pradesh Indian Liquor and Foreign Liquor Rules, 1970; Punjab Municipalities Act, 1976 - Sections 90(4); Excise Law; Andhra Pradesh Excise Rules

Reported in : 2006(1)ALD445; 2006(1)ALT443

Advocate for Respondent : Government Pleader, ;Polisetti Radha Krishna, SC for Municipalities and ;S. Nageswara Reddy, Adv.

ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.1. A short, but interesting question, as to power of the Municipality or Municipal Corporation constituted under A.P. Municipalities Act, 1965 (for short 'the Municipalities Act') and/or the Hyderabad Municipal Corporations Act, 1955 (for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 01 2009

Prohibition and Excise Superintendent and anr. Vs. Toddy Tappers Co-op ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-01-2009

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Excise Act, 1968 - Sections 28; Andhra Pradesh Excise (Lease of Right to sell Liquor in Retail) Rules, 1969 - Rules 16 and 18; Andhra Pradesh Excise (Arrack and Toddy Licenses General Conditions) Rules, 1969 - Rule 18; Andhra Pradesh Excise (Indian and Foreign Liquor Retail Sale Conditions of Licences) Rules, 1993 - Rule 33

Reported in : 2009(5)ALT39

Advocate for Respondent : P. Amarnath Goud, Adv.

P.V. Sanjay Kumar, J.1. The entitlement of the Excise Department to collect rentals for the period of the excise year anterior to the grant of licence and for the period during which the toddy shop was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial