Advanced Search Results

Managing Society, Goswami Ganesh Dutt Sanatan Dharam College Vs. Union ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952 - Sections 3 and 22; Chandigarh Lease Hold of Sites and Buildings Rules, 1973 - Rule 13; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : AIR1992P& H284; (1993)105PLR173

Advocate for Respondent : Anand Swaroop, Sr. Adv. and; Rajiv Vij, Adv.

ORDERV.K. Bali, J.1. Sequel to the order and consequent notice issued by the Chandigarh Administration for change to be brought about in the allotment letter conveying allotment of 10.5 acres of land to the petitioner nearly...

Prem Singh and ors. Vs. Union Territory Through Its Administrator and ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1) and 6(1); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : (1992)102PLR370

Advocate for Respondent : Anand Swaroop, Sr. Adv. and; Alok Jain, Adv.

ORDERHarjit Singh Bedi, J.1. By the present judgment, I propose to dispose of C.W.P. Nos. 12936, 13958 and 14898 of 1991. The facts have been taken from C.W.P. No. 12936 of 1991.2. The petitioners are owners...

Sukhdev Singh Vs. Union Territory, Chandigarh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1985 - Sections 3 and 4; Press and Registration of Books Act, 1867 - Sections 7; Constitution of India - Article 19(1)

Reported in : AIR1987P& H5

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Anand Swaroop

M.M. Punchhi, J.1. This petition for bail speedily climbed the ladder of being heard by a Full Bench. To begin with, when the matter came up before me sitting singly, I referred it to a larger...

Sukhdev Singh Vs. Union Territory

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1986CriLJ1757

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Anand Swaroop

M.M. Punchhi, J.1. This petition for bail speedily climbed the ladder of being heard by a Full Bench. To begin with, when the matter came up before me sitting singly, I referred it to a larger...

Om Prakash Verma Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921; Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Regulations - Regulations 2, 3, 3(1) and 3(2); Uttar Pradesh High Schools and Intermediate Colleges (Payment of Salaries to Teachers and other Employees) Act, 1971; University Grant Commission Act, 1956 - Sections 3

Reported in : (2005)1UPLBEC774

Advocate for Respondent : S.C.

V.K. Shukla, J.1. Brief facts giving rise to present writ petition is that in the district of Moradabad, there is a recognized institution known as Lal Bahadur Shastri Smarak Inter College, Sultanpurdost, Thakurdwara, Disrict Moradabad. The...

Ram Swaroop and anr. Vs. Sua Lal

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Debt Law; Bombay Agriculturists Debt Relief Act, 1947 - Sections 52

Reported in : AIR1972Raj98; 1971(4)WLN448

Advocate for Respondent : H.P. Gupta, Adv.

C.M. Lodha, J.1. This second appeal by the plaintiffs raises a question oi interpretation of Section 52 of the Bombay Agricultural Debtor's Relief Act, 1947 (Act No. XXVIII of 1947), which will hereinafter be referred to...

Pooran Ram and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1990(2)WLN163

1. By the Court. The appellants were tried by the Sessions Judge, Chum for the Charges Under Sections 147, 302 read with 149, 325, 323 read with 149 IPC. Vide judgment dated February 3, 1984 the...

Gurdayal Saran Prasad Vs. District Judge, Dehradun and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106; Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 3 and 3(1); Delhi Rent Control Act - Sections 2

Reported in : 1998(1)AWC174

Advocate for Respondent : H.S. Nigam, Adv.

J. C. Gupta, J.1. Heard the petitioner's counsel as well as Sri Shakti Swaroop Nigam for the respondents.2. By means of this writ petition the petitioner has challenged the order of the Additional District Judge dated...

In Re: J.K. Satoh Agricultural Machines Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CompanySICA

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 3(1), 15, 15(1), 16, 17, 18, 20, 20(1), 22, 22A, 23A and 23B; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 441, 454, 481, 530, 531, 531A, 532, 533, 536, 537, 542, 543 and 545; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21, Rule 64; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) (Amendment) Act, 1993

Reported in : [2007]138CompCas955(All); (2006)5CompLJ102(All)

Sunil Ambwani, J.1. The Company Application No. 2 of 1990 dated 31.1.1990 was registered, on a recommendation made by Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) under Section 20(1) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions)'Act...

Vinay Kumar Agarwal Vs. 17th Addl. District Judge, Allahabad and Other ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106; Uttar Pradesh Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 20, 20(1), (2) and (4), 28, 30 and 30(1); Provincial Small Causes Courts Act, 1887 - Sections 25

Reported in : 2001(2)AWC1531

Advocate for Respondent : Sri. Yogesh Agarwal. Sri Ratnakar Bharti

O.P. Garg, J.1. Originally late Ram Swaroop Agarwal was the tenant in premises No. 476 (old No. 364) Badshahi Mandi, Allahabad. After his death in the year 1980, his son Vinay Kumar Agarwal, the present petitioner...