Advanced Search Results

Navyug School Parents Assn. and anr. Vs. Chairperson, Navyug School Ed ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1999IIAD(Delhi)88; 78(1999)DLT207

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sushil Salwan and ; Mr. S.R. Yadav, Advs.

ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J.1. The petitioners in the writ petition challenged the appointment of the 3rd respondent as the Vice Principal of Sr. Navyug School, Peshwa Road, New Delhi and the appointment of the 3rd respondent as...

Jyoti Gupta Vs. Ashok Kumar and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 2002ACJ1056; 2001IVAD(Delhi)959; 91(2001)DLT427; 2001(59)DRJ223

Advocate for Respondent : Sushil Salwan, Adv.

K. Rama Moorthy, J.1. The appeal is against the judgment of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal dated 29.7.1992 according a sum of Rs. 33,161/- as compensation to the appellant. The facts culminating in the filing of...

Government of Nct of Delhi Vs. Binata Naha

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : March 27, 2015. + W.P.(C) 3405/2014 & CM APPL. NO.7016/2014 GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sushil Dutt Salwan...

William Jacks and Co. (India) Ltd. Vs. Skipper Sales Pvt. Ltd. and ors ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 40, Rules 1 and 2; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 5 and 6; Constitution of India - Article 300A

Reported in : 1997VIAD(Delhi)357; 69(1997)DLT36

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. N. S. Bajwa

K. Ramamoorthy, J.(1) The builders Skipper Sales Pvt. Ltd. and Skipper Towers Pvt. Ltd. had not acted in accordance with the business ethics and that had resulted in number of persons instituting suits in this Court....

M/S. National Aluminium Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax, Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on November 19, 2014 Judgment delivered on December 11, 2014 + ST. REF. No.17/2002 M/S. NATIONAL ALUMINIUM CO. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Debashish Mohapatra,...

Govt. of Nct and ors. Vs. Amar Singh

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on October 30, 2013 Judgment Delivered on November 07, 2013 + W.P.(C) 5428/2013 GOVT. OF NCT & ORS. ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr. Sushil Dutt...

D.D.A. Vs. Pandit Construction Co.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Limitation

Reported in : 114(2004)DLT508; 2004(77)DRJ542

Advocate for Respondent : Raman Kapur, Adv.

Vijender Jain, J.1. This application for condensation of delay has been filed by DDA for condoning the delay of 421 days in filing the application under Order 9 rule 9 for setting aside the order of...

D.D.A. Vs. Salwan Furnishing Co.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act - Sections 30

Reported in : 2003(3)ARBLR302(Delhi); 106(2003)DLT550; 2003(70)DRJ569

Advocate for Respondent : Sushil Salwan, Adv.

S.K. Mahajan, J.1. The appellant DDA has filed this appeal to challenge the judgment of the learned Additional District Judge whereby the objections filed by the appellant under Section 30 of the Arbitration Act to set...

State Through Supdtt., Central Jail, N. Delhi Vs. Charulata Joshi and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Media and CommunicationCriminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 21

Reported in : AIR1999SC1379; 1999(1)ALD(Cri)723; 1999CriLJ2273; 1999(2)Crimes346(SC); JT1999(3)SC104; 1999(2)SCALE594; (1999)4SCC65; [1999]2SCR605; 1999(2)LC1118(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : Sushil Salwan, ; Sunil Gupta, ; Pramod Dayal and ;

ORDERG.B. Pattanaik, J.1. Competing rights, namely, right of press to interview a prisoner in jail and right of jail authorities prohibiting such interview arise for consideration in the present appeal. One Babloo Srivastava, who is in...

Shri Avtar Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 6, 11 and 48; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 114 and 151

Reported in : 2002IIAD(Delhi)797

Advocate for Respondent : Sandeep Sethi and ; Sushil Salwan, Advs.

A.K. Sikri, J. 1. The appellant in this Letters Patent Appeal had challenged Order dated 10th October, 1978 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court dismissing the Writ Petition of the appellant. In the...