Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: sushil kumar biswas · Page 1 of about 25 results (0.056 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 15 1966

In Re: P.C. Sen, Chief Minister of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-15-1966

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 20 and 215; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Section 1(2)

Reported in : AIR1966Cal411,1966CriLJ883,70CWN579

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. S. Choudhury

ORDERB.N. Banerjee, J.1. In this Rule, P. C. Sen, the Chief Minister of West Bengal, stands charged with exhibition of contumacious conduct towards this Court, under circumstance hereinafter stated. 2. On November 18, 1965, the Governor...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 08 1970

Ranjit Ghosh Vs. Hindusthan Steel Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-08-1970

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 19, Rule 1 - Order 39, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1971Cal100,75CWN721

Advocate for Respondent : Nani Coomar Chakraborty and ;Pasupati Nath Chunder, Advs.

N.C. Talukdar, J. 1. This appeal is at the instance of the plaintiff against an order dated the 22nd March, 1969 passed by Sri A. N. Banerjee, Judge, Second Bench, City Civil Court, Calcutta, in Title...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 12 1976

Netai Chandra Ghose and ors. Vs. Phani Bhusan Biswas and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-12-1976

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 and 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : AIR1977Cal40

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Biswas, Adv.

N.C. Mukherji, J. 1. This is an application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure and is directed against Order No. 195 dated February 18, 1972 passeed by Sri R. L. Mukherjee, Subordinate Judge,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 16 1975

Sushil Kumar Ghosh and ors. Vs. Revenue Officer, Balurghat and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-16-1975

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 11; ;West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1954 - Section 5A

Reported in : AIR1976Cal1

Advocate for Respondent : Sushil Kumar Biswas and ;Moni Bhusan Sarkar, Advs.

Sankak Prasad Mitra, C.J.1. By this judgment we propose to deal with nine appeals. These are First Miscellaneous Appeals Nos. 367 to 375 of 1975. These appeals arise out of Civil Revision Cases Nos. 6927 (W)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 07 1953

indra Kumar Karnani Vs. Sundardas Thackersey and Bros.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-07-1953

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : West Bengal Premises Rent Control (Temporary Provisions) Act, 1950; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908

Reported in : AIR1953Cal570,57CWN239

Advocate for Respondent : Sushil Kumar Biswas and ;C. Tondon, Advs.

Chakravartti, C.J.1. This Rule raises an interesting question of first impression under the Rent Control Act of 1950.2. The facts are simple. The opposite party is the tenant in respect of Godown No. 9B, situated at...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 10 1963

Abdul Haque and anr. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-10-1963

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 105 and 106; ;West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1954 - Section 1

Reported in : AIR1964Cal183,67CWN1064

Advocate for Respondent : P.K. Banerjee and ;Sushil Kumar Biswas, Advs. for Opp. Parties (Nos. 1 to 5)

D.N. Sinha, J. 1. The petitioners are inhabitants of village Naksha within the Police Station Mogra, District Hooghly, and C. S. plots Nos. 325, 326, 364 and 379 of the said Mouza Naksha were khas lands...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 03 1973

Anil Baran Deoty and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-03-1973

Subject : Property

Acts : Howrah Improvement Act, 1956 - Sections 33(2), 45, 49 and 52; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1974Cal205,77CWN826

Advocate for Respondent : Sushil Kumar Biswas, Adv.

ORDERAnil Kumar Sen, J.1. In this Writ petition the sixteen petitioners whose properties were covered by an Improvement Scheme framed and published on November 4, 1965, by respondent No. 3 are praying for a mandate upon...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 01 1976

Sm. Safura Bibi Vs. Ram Prasad Saw and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-01-1976

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Partition Act, 1893 - Section 4 and 4(1)

Reported in : AIR1977Cal207,(1977)1CompLJ55(Cal),81CWN446

Advocate for Respondent : Sushil Kumar Biswas, Adv.

Salil Kumar Datta, J.1. This Rule was obtained against Order No. 170 dated 9th July, 1975 in a Partition Suit whereby the application of the plaintiff was allowed. The effect of the order is that the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 06 1957

Azamabad Tea Co. Private Ltd. and anr. Vs. Suraj Ratan Thirani and ors ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-06-1957

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 133; ;Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 179; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 109 and 110 - Order 45, Rule 2; ;Supreme Court Rules, 1950 - Order 12, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1958Cal296,62CWN155

Advocate for Respondent : Sushil Kumar Biswas, Adv.

Chakravartti, C.J.1. The petitioners ask for a certificate under Article 133(1) of the Constitution of India for the purpose of a proposed appeal to the Supreme Court against a judgment and decree of this Court, dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 10 1958

Sm. Parbati Devi Vs. Kashmirilal Sarma and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-10-1958

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 41, 51 and 105; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 100; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 115

Reported in : AIR1959Cal69

Advocate for Respondent : Prafulla Kumar Roy and ;Sushil Kumar Biswas, Advs.

K.C. Das Gupta, J. 1. The property in litigation belonged originally to Mangrulal Ahir. The plaintiff's case is that on MangruYal's death, his widow and minor sons, defendants Nos. 3 to 7, became owners of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial