Advanced Search Results
Jodh Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Himachal Pradesh
Oct-26-1999
Criminal
Constitution of India - Articles 32, 136, 226 and 227; ;Army Act, 1950 - Sections 69 and 354; ;Ranbir Penal Code (IPC), 1989 Smvt. - Sections 97, 300 and 302; ;Probation of Offenders Act - Sections 3 and 4; ;Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 23(3), 149 and 151 to 165; ;Evidence Act - Section 105; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 97; ;Navy Act, 1957; ;Air Force Act, 1950
2000CriLJ2393
Sureshwar Thakur, Addl. C.G.S. Counsel
Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J.1. The above writ petition has been filed by Naik (Lance Havildar) Jodh Singh under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs :I. To quash the order...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLachhman Vs. Asstt. Engineer, Sub-divn.ii Hp Pwd
Himachal Pradesh
Jul-10-1997
Labour and Industrial
Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 4A3 and 30
(1998)IILLJ1213HP
Shyama Dogra, Adv.
Arun Kumar Goel, J.1. This appeal under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') has been filed by Lachhman (hereinafter referred to as 'the claimant').2. Facts in this case...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohan Singh and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Himachal Pradesh
Feb-23-1999
Banking
Constitution of India - Article 14
[2000]99CompCas81(HP)
Sureshwar Thakur, Addl. CGS for respondent No. 1,; K.S. Rathore, Adv. for respondent No. 2 and;
D. Raju, C.J. 1. The above writ petition has been filed seeking for a declaration to quash Sub-clause (c) of Clause 3 of annexure filed as PB as also the decision rendered by the third respondent...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›