Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: suresh · Page 1 of about 58,418 results (1.420 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 21 1996

Shree Cements Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-21-1996

Subject : ExciseCivil

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 3; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - Sections 3; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 57A, 57G, 57I and 173Q(1)

Reported in : 2005(182)ELT315(Raj)

Advocate for Respondent : Suresh Pareek and; S.S. Hasan, Advs.

ORDER1. petitioner No. 1, is a Company within the meaning of Section 3 of the Companies Act, 1956. It carries on the business of manufacturing Cement at Beawar.2. The cement manufactured by it is subject to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 14 2020

Sasikala M.S vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Dec-14-2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2020 / 23RD AGRAHAYANA, 1942 PETITIONER: SASIKALA M.S., AGED 55 YEARS W/O. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR B.P., RESIDING...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 18 2006

Ramchandra Govindrao Gaidhani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-18-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968 - Rules 8 and 10; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : [2007(113)FLR804]; (2007)ILLJ958Bom

Advocate for Respondent : Suresh Kumar, Adv.

V.K. Tahilramani, J.1. In this Petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner assails the judgment of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, Mumbai dated December 14, 1998, whereby the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 30 2024

Velmurughan,S/O Ramayya, vs State of Kerala,

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jul-30-2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JULY 2024 / 8TH SRAVANA, 1946 CRIME NO.484/2024 OF Vandiperiyar Police Station, Idukki ------------- PETITIONERS/ACCUSED :- 1 VELMURUGHAN, AGED...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 24 1982

Bombay Municipal Corporation for Greater Bombay and anr. Vs. Ramesh G. ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-24-1982

Subject : Municipal Tax

Acts : Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 3, 140 and 217

Reported in : 1983(1)BomCR262

Advocate for Respondent : H. Suresh, Adv. i/b., Tayabji Dayabhai and Co. for respondent No. 1

V.S. Kotwal, J.1. Raising of colourful flower beds and maintenance of a garden and a lawn would no doubt enhance the beauty of the building and the healthy environment of living which may not necessarily be...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 16 2004

S. Mary Fathima Alias S. Karuna Vs. Anna Mary Vijaya and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-16-2004

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 302

Reported in : AIR2005Kant132; 2004(6)KarLJ153

Advocate for Respondent : A. Ananda Leo and Associates for Respondent No. 1 and ;Sriyuths Suresh S. Joshi, ;Santosh Bhagwal and ;R. Balaji, Advs. for Respondent No. 2

ORDERD.V. Shylendra Kumar, J.1. This is a petition presented under Section 302 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 ('the Act' for short) by one of the beneficiaries under a Will dated 4-10-1965 left behind by one...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 26 2006

Muralidhar Deshpande @ Raja S/O Hanumantharao Deshpande and Smt. Annap ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-26-2006

Subject : Property

Acts : Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 - Sections 3, 4, 4(1) and 4(3)

Reported in : 2007(2)KarLJ47; 2007(1)KCCR159; 2006(6)AIRKarR530

Advocate for Respondent : B.N. Suresh, Adv.

D.V. Shylendra Kumar, J.1. This Regular First Appeal is by the defendants in OS No. 78 of 1994, on the file of the City Civil (Sr Dn), Gulbarga.2. The suit filed by the plaintiff who is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 01 1997

Devarakonda Edl. Society Vs. All India Council Technical Education and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-01-1997

Subject : Constitution

Acts : All India Council for Technical Eduation Act, 1987 - Sections 2, 10(1), 11, 22 and 23; Constitution of India - Article 14; All India Council for Technical Eduation (Grant of approval for starting new technical institutions, introduction of courses or programmes and approval of intake capacity of seats for courses or programmes) Regulations, 1994 - Regulations 4 to 8, 8(5 to 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 15) and 9(2, 4 and 5); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(66); Uttar Pradesh Universities Act, 1991 - Sections 2(3); Education Act, 1982 - Sections 2(3); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 17, Rule 3 - Order 41, Rule 1; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 3; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 3 and 4; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 16 and 114; Specific R

Reported in : AIR1997AP389; 1997(3)ALT117

Advocate for Respondent : MVS Suresh Kumar, Standing Counsel

ORDER1. The two writ petitions emanate between the same parties involving several common questions of law and facts. Among them. W. P. No. 24515/96 was filed earlier on 19-11-1996 and W. P. No. 27059/96 was filed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 11 2008

Sadula Narsimha and anr. Vs. Sadula Tulasi Das and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-11-2008

Subject : Civil

Acts : Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act - Sections 19(1) and 32; Limitation Act - Sections 5; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 96 - Order 9, Rule 13 - Order 41, Rules 3A and 3A(1)

Reported in : 2009(2)ALT119

Advocate for Respondent : K. Mahipathi Rao, Adv. for ;J. Suresh Babu, Adv.

ORDERGopala Krishna Tamada, J.1. This revision is directed against the order dated 26.10.2007, passed in C.F.R. No. 3902 of 2007 on the file of the Court of the District Judge, Mahabubnagar, whereby the learned District Judge...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 24 2001

Kommuru Hazarathaiah Vs. Thadikamalla Anantha Lakshmi

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-24-2001

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 9, 21 and 151 - Order 7, Rule 11; Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960; Andhra Pradesh Rent Control Act - Sections 8(5)

Reported in : 2002(1)ALT16

Advocate for Respondent : M.V.S. Suresh Kumar, Adv.

ORDERP.S. Narayana, J. 1. Heard both the counsel and perused the material on record. 2. The short question that falls for consideration in the present C.R.P. is whether the plaint in O.S. No. 178 of 1997...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial