Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: surathi mohan sanyal · Page 1 of about 28 results (0.047 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 16 1984

Duncan Agro Industries Ltd. Vs. J. Banerjee

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-16-1984

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4, 11B and 35A; ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 2(11), 10, 11 and 173J

Reported in : 1984(2)ECC241,1987(30)ELT231(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : Surathi Mohan Sanyal, Adv.

Ajit Kumar Sengupta, J.1. National Tobacco Company of India Limited moved this application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the legality and validity of a notice dated 14th April, 1975 issued by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 06 1989

Sudhindra Nath Patra Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-06-1989

Subject : Excise

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 105, 111, 112, 120 and 121; ;Defence of India Rules, 1962 - Rules 126L, 126L(16), 126(M); ;Defence of India (Fourth Amendment) Rules, 1966 - Rule 126(16); ;Defence of India (Fourth Amendment) Rules - 126M(1-A); ;Defence of India (Ninth Amendment) Rules, 1963; ;Gold (Control) Rules, 1963 - Rule 126M; ;Gold (Control) Act, 1968 - Section 71, 74 and 116(2); ;Gold (Control) Act, 1965 - Section 1(3); ;Constitution of India - Article 352; ;Defence of India Ordinance, 1962; ;General Clauses Act 1897 - Sections 6, 6(1), 6(2) and 116; ;Defence of India Act, 1962; ;Gold (Control) Order, 1968 - Section 116(1)(2); ;Gold (Control) Ordinance - Sections 117, 117(1), 117(2)

Reported in : 1992(58)ELT396(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : Surathi Mohan Sanyal and ;Amit Talukdar, Advs.

ORDERParitosh Kumar Mukherjee, J.1. The instant writ petition was moved challenging, inter alia, the order of revision passed by the Central Government whereby the revisional authority declined to interfere with the appellate order dated May 21,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 12 1975

S.P. Sinha and ors. Vs. Labour Enforcement Officer (Central)

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-12-1975

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1976CriLJ76

ORDERN.C. Talukdar, J.1. This Rule is at the instance of three accused-petitioners directed against two orders dated the 28th August, 1972 and the 29th September, 1972 passed by Sri S- C. Nundy. Judicial Magistrate. First Class,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 11 1980

Customs for Prevention (i) Vs. Remo Morgani

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-11-1980

Subject : CriminalCustoms

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 5, 111, 135 and 137; ;Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1964 - Section 20; ;Sea Customs Act - Section 167(81); ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 342 and 378(4); ;Baggage Rules; ;High Court Rules - Rule 9(2); ;Imports (Control) Order, 1955

Reported in : 1983(12)ELT790(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : P.K. Ghosh and ;Jugal Ch. Porel, Advs.

N.C. Mukherjee, J.1. This appeal was filed after obtaining a special leave to appeal against an order of acquittal passed in case No. 907 of 1968 under Section 135(b) of the Customs Act by Shri D....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 11 1980

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Remo Morgani, Corlton Hotel

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-11-1980

Subject : CriminalCustoms

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 5, 111 and 135; ;Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1964 - Section 20; ;Sea Customs Act - Section 167(81); ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 342 and 378(4); ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 417(3) and 417(4); ;Constitution of India; ;Baggage Rules - Rule 9(2); ;Imports (Control) Order, 1955

Reported in : 1984(2)ECC359,1983(14)ELT2322(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : Pradip Kumar Ghosh, Adv.

ORDERN.C. Mukherji, J.1. This appeal was filed after obtaining a special leave to appeal against an order of acquittal passed in Case No. 907 of 1968 under Section 135(b) of the Customs Act by Sri D.P....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 16 1984

Duncan Agro Industries Ltd. Vs. Central Board of Excise and Customs

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-16-1984

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4, 11B and 35A; ;Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 2, 10, 11 and 173J; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1985(22)ELT770(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Dey and ;S.M. Sanyal, Advs.

A.K. Sen Gupta, J.1. National Tobacco Company of India Limited moved this application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the legality and validity of a notice dated 14th April, 1975, issued by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 06 1982

Officer-in-charge, Customs, Berhampur Preventive Unit Vs. Minati Biswa ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-06-1982

Subject : CustomsCriminal

Acts : Bengal Criminal Law Amendment Act - Section 4(1); ;Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 104, 105, 107, 110, 110(1), 111, 122 and 151; ;Essential Commodities Act; ;Arms Act, 1955; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 5, 401, 451, 455, 457 and 482

Reported in : 1984(2)ECC219,1983(12)ELT798(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : P.K. Roy, Adv.

ORDERN.C. Chaudhuri, J.1. In this petition under Section 401 read with Section 482 Cr. P.C. the order dated 6-3-81 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Berhampore, District Murshidabad in NGR 679/79-TR 489/79 is called in question. By...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 20 1975

N. Dutta Majumdar Vs. Anil Kumar Bose

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-20-1975

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1975CriLJ1595

A.N. Banerjee, J.1. On a reference made to this Court by the Chairman Disciplinary Committee No. 3 of the Bar Council of West Bengal, a Rule directing the. contemner respondent to show cause as to why...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 06 1958

Md. Mahboob and anr. Vs. Bibhuti Bhusan Gupta

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-06-1958

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 480

Reported in : AIR1960Cal63

Advocate for Respondent : Bimal Chandra Chatterjee, Adv. for Nos. 637 and 638 of 1955, ;N.K. Basu and ;Surathi Mohan Sanyal, Advs. for Nos. 533 and 535 of 1955

Bhattacharya, J.1. These four petitions in revision are heard together for the sate of convenience. In two cases, Rules were obtained by the accused and in the other two Rules were granted to the complainant regarding...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 10 1955

Panchu Gopal Mullik and anr. Vs. the State and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-10-1955

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Section 88(6A)

Reported in : AIR1955Cal524,1955CriLJ1343,60CWN47

Advocate for Respondent : Surathi Mohan Sanyal, Adv.

ORDERDebabrata Mookerjee, J. 1. This revision petition raises a rather interesting question of law.2. One Jagabandhu Mallick left two sons, one of them being the petitioner Panchu Gopal Mallick and the other Akshoy Kumar Mallick since...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial