Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: suprokash banerjee · Page 1 of about 19 results (0.036 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 29 2002

Prasanjit Ghosh and ors. Vs. West Bengal Board of Secondary Education ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-29-2002

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21 and 226

Reported in : (2002)2CALLT261(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : B.R. Bhattacharjee and ;Tulsidas Maiti, Advs. for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and ;Suprokash Banerjee and ;Arati Sirkar, Advs. for the Respondent Nos. 5 to 7

A. Chakrabarti, J. 1. This writ petition was heard along with W.P. No. 19524 (W) of 2001. 47 students represented by their respective guardians filed two present writ petitions seeking relief of appearing in the Secondary...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 10 1992

The Hilla Tea Estates and Industries Ltd. and Anothers Vs. State of We ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-10-1992

Subject : Property

Acts : Calcutta High Court (Appellate side), Rules - Rule 16;; West Bangal Estates Acquisition Act, 1954 - Sections 6(3), 6(5) and 10(2);; West Bangal Estate Acquisition Rules, 1954 - Rule 4;; West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953 - Sections 4, 5, 6, 6(1), 10(5) and 42(2);; Tea Act, 1953;; Constitution of India - Article 226;; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) 1908 - Section 151 - Order 39, Rule 2(3)

Reported in : AIR1993Cal236

Advocate for Respondent : Suprokash Banerjee, ;Miss. Arti Sircar, ;Dhruba Kumar Mukherjee, ;Alak Kumar Ghosh, and ;Adbul Hadi, Advs.

ORDER1. This writ petition was moved on behalf of The Hilla Tea Estates and Industries Limited and another, inter alia, praying for a declaration that the Hilla Tea Estates and Industries Limited, the petitioner No. 1...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 07 1990

Subodh Kumar Das Vs. Sub-divisional Officer and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-07-1990

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 141 and 226

Reported in : (1990)2CALLT418(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : Suprokash Banerjee and ;Arati Sarkar, Advs.

Paritosh Kumar Mukherjee, J.1. This writ petition was moved on behalf of Subodh Kumar Das, a Tahasildar, challenging an order of reinstatement dated September, 8, 1987, which is Annexure 'A' to the writ petition.2. By the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 17 1983

West Bengal Head Masters' Association and Anr. Vs. Union of India (UOi ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-17-1983

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 51A and 226; ;West Bengal Secondary Education Act, 1963 - Sections 19A, 19A(3), 19A(5) and 27(2); ;West Bengal Secondary Education (Amendment) Act, 1982

Reported in : AIR1983Cal448,87CWN597

Advocate for Respondent : Sushanta Kumar Kundu, Adv. (for No. 1), ;Pulak Ranjan Mondal, Adv. (for Nos. 2, 8 to 24), ;Somnath Chatterjee, ;Arun Prakash Sircar, ;Suprokash Banerjee and ;Atindra Nath Banerjee, Advs. (for Nos. 3 t

M.M. Dutt, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by the West Bengal Head Masters' Association and the West Bengal Guardians' Association against the judgment of a learned Judge of this Court whereby the learned Judge discharged...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 01 1988

A.L. Goel Vs. Punjab National Bank and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-01-1988

Subject : BankingService

Acts : Punjab National Bank (Officers) Service Regulations, 1979 - Regulation 19

Reported in : (1988)2CALLT210(HC),93CWN59

Advocate for Respondent : Tapas Banerjee, ;Suprokash Banerjee and ;Artti Sarkar, Advs.

Umesh Chandra Banerjee, J.1. The focal point for consideration in this matter is the order of premature retirement issued against the petitioner.2. Dr. Mukherjee appearing in support of the petition challenged the order of premature retirement...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 07 2007

Kiran Subbha and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-07-2007

Subject : Service

Acts : West Bengal School Service Commission Act, 1997 - Sections 7, 9 and 15; ;National Commission for Minority Educational Institutions Act, 2004 - Sections 10, 11, 12A, 12B and 12C; ;Management Rules, 1969 - Rules 8(3), 8(3A), 28 and 33; ;Darjeeling Gorkha Hill Council Act, 1988 - Sections 29 and 70; ;National Commission of Minorities Act, 1992 - Section 2; ;West Bengal Board of Secondary Education Act, 1963 - Sections 10, 19(3), 19A(3) and 45; ;School Service Commission Act; ;Constitution of India - Articles 26 and 30 and 30(1); ;School Service Commission Rules - Rule 7(2)

Reported in : 2008(2)CHN530

Advocate for Respondent : Jayanta Mitra, ;Debal Banerjee and ;B.P. Subba for DGHC respondent No. 6 in W.P. No. 2153 (W) of 2003, ;Suprokash Banerjee, ;Abhijit Gangopadhyay and ;Banhi Ray, Advs. for respondent No. 7 in W.P. No.

Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, J.1. The above writ petition and the appeal being MAT No. 52/04 with FMA No. 1713/03 are heard together as the principal point of controversy involved in those matters are interlinked with each...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 16 1981

Vijoy Bahadur Singh and ors. Vs. Director, Secondary Education and ors ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-16-1981

Subject : Constitution

Acts : West Bengal Board of Secondary Education Act, 1963 - Section 45; ;Management of Recognised Non-Government Institutions (Aided and Unaided) Rules, 1969 - Rules 27(2), 27(3) and 28(2); ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1981Cal105,85CWN284

Advocate for Respondent : Arun Prosad Sircar and ;Apurba Lal Bose, Advs. (for Nos. 1, 3, 4 and 5), ;Suprokash Banerjee, Adv. (for No. 2), ;Jamini Kr. Banerjee, Adv. (for No. 7), Rabindra Nath Mitra, Adv. (for No. 8) and ;Tapas

ORDERB.C. Ray, J.1. The petitioners who are members of the Managing Committee of Gouripur Hindi High School a Class X High School, duly recognised by the West Bengal Board of Secondary Education has assailed in this...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 14 1972

Sudhansu Sekhar Maity and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-14-1972

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 5A and 6; ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rule 1 - Order 2, Rule 3

Reported in : AIR1972Cal320

Advocate for Respondent : S.C. Bose and ;Suprokash Banerjee, Advs.

ORDERAnil Kumar Sen, J. 1. Two notifications under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) and two consequent declarations under Section 6 of the said Act are the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 25 1971

E.H. Tippoo and Anr. Vs. the Hon'ble the Chief Justice of India and Or ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-25-1971

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226 and 245(1); ;Calcutta High Court (Jurisdictional Limits) Act, 1919; ;Advocates Act, 1961

Reported in : AIR1971Cal354

Advocate for Respondent : B. Das, Adv. General, ;S.C. Bose, ;C.D. Roy Chowdhury, ;Suprokash Banerjee, Advs. (for Nos. 3 and 6) and ;Balai Chandra Roy, Adv. (for No. 5)

ORDERD. Basu, J.1. The Petitioners who are citizens of India, challenge the constitutionality of the Letters Patent of 1865, the Calcutta High Court (Jurisdictional Limits) Act, 1919 and Section 34(2)(3) of the Advocates Act, 1961 on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 03 1972

Sri Debi Mata and ors. Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-03-1972

Subject : PropertyConstitution

Acts : West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953 - Sections 4, 4(2), 4(6), 15(5), 38, 52, 60 and 61; ;West Bengal Estates Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1963; ;Constitution of India - Article 245

Reported in : AIR1973Cal171,76CWN930

Advocate for Respondent : S.C. Das Gupta, Sr. Govt. Pleader and ;Suprokash Banerjee, Adv.

P.B. Mukharji, C.J.1. These appeals are from the judgment and order of Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sen made under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. In these five Rules, the petitioners are challenging three Notifications...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial