Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: sumer chand and · Page 1 of about 235 results (0.067 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 22 1994

Sumer Chand (In Jail) Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-22-1994

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302, 307 and 324; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 1995CriLJ1042

Advocate for Respondent : V.S. Misra, D.G.A.

Palok Basu, J. 1. Both these appeals arise out of the Judgment and order dated 18-6-1993 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dchradun in S. T. No. 148 of 1988 whereby both the appellants stand convicted...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 16 1958

Mahadeo and ors. Vs. the Sub-divisional Officer, Kunda and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-16-1958

Subject : Election

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 1; Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Rules, 1947 - Rule 25

Reported in : AIR1959All43

Advocate for Respondent : Standing Counsel

ORDERV.G. Oak, J. 1. This petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution is directed against a decision of the learned Sub-Divisional Officer, Kunda, district Partabgarh, dismissing an election petition. Maha-deo and nine others are the petitioners...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 1990

Sumer Chand S/O Late Sardha Ram Vs. Ram Kishan Kaura and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-20-1990

Subject : Family Property

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 14 and 14(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 7, Rule 16 - Order 41, Rule 33; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 58 and 65

Reported in : AIR1991P& H103

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Ram Kishan Kaura, Adv.

1. This appeal is by the defendant filed against the judgment and decree of the Additional District Judge, Kurukshetra, dated Dec. 16, 1986, whereby suit filed by Ram Kishan Kaura and others was partly decreed as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 06 1976

Baljit Singh and anr. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-06-1976

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 107, 117, and 313; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) ; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 147, 149, 300, 302, 304 and 323

Reported in : AIR1976SC2273; 1976CriLJ1745; (1976)4SCC590

Advocate for Respondent : H. R. Khanna and ; M.N. Shroff, Advs.

S. Murtaza Fazl Ali, J.1. Criminal Appeal No. 251 of 1971 and Criminal Appeals Nos. 273 and 274 of 1971 arise out of the same trial and a common judgment given by the trial Court and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 05 2008

Krishna Ganpatrao Kamdi and ors. Vs. Liladhar S/O Laxman Pathode and o ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : May-05-2008

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Bombay Co-operative Societies Act, 1925; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 13B, 13B(1), 13B(2), 21(11A), 73, 73(1), 73(1A), 73A, 73B, 73(1B), 73(1C), 73(1D), 73G, 91, 91(1), 91A, 144C, 144F, 144L, 144T, 144X and 165(1); Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 100 and 100(1); Maharashtra Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 12, 21 and 22; Companies Act, 1956; Constitution of India - Article 226; Maharashtra Specified Co-operative Societies Election to Committee Rules, 1971 - Rules 19, 19(2), 74 and 81

Reported in : 2008(4)ALLMR223; 2008(6)MhLj391

Advocate for Respondent : C.S. Kaptan, Adv. for Respondent No. 1

Swatanter Kumar, C.J.1. It is a settled cannon of interpretative law that recital or preamble of an Act is key for opening the meaning and intent of an Act. Equally true it is that preamble of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 27 1926

Dhani Ram and ors. Vs. Sumer Chand and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-27-1926

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1927All182

1. We think this appeal ought to be allowed. The matter is a simple one and arises out of proceedings taken tinder Section 144 of the Civil P.C. by Dhani Ram and others.2. These applicants are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 24 1922

Musammat Jhamola Kunwar Vs. Thakur Hanwant Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-24-1922

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : AIR1922All129; 66Ind.Cas.915

1. These are cross-appeals against a decree of the Additional Judge of Allahabad. We have heard Counsel at length in both oases and have come to the conclusion that the decision of the Court below should...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 03 1992

Om Parkash Rohila Vs. Sat Pal and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-03-1992

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 - Sections 2 and 13; Rent Restriction Act - Sections 13

Reported in : (1993)103PLR168

Advocate for Respondent : B.R. Mahajan and; P.S. Saini, Advs.

ORDERN.K. Kapoor, J.1. This is landlord's revision-petition against the order of the Appellate Authority whereby order of the Rent Controller dismissing his eviction application has been upheld.2. Briefly put, Om Parkash filed a petition under section...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 31 1985

Ravi Sharma Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-31-1985

Subject : CriminalCustoms

Acts : Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 3(1)

Reported in : 28(1985)DLT171

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. M. Chandrasekhar

ORDER Whereas an order F. No. 673.00 85-Cus. Viii dated 14-1-1985, has been passed by the Additional Secretary to the Government of India u/s 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 1958

Dr. Y.S. Parmar Vs. Hira Singh Pal and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-31-1958

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 46, 77, 100(1) 123(2), 123(6) and 123(7); ;Representation of the People (Amendment) Act, 1956

Advocate for Respondent : M.L. Kalia and; Ishwar Chandra, Advs.

T. Ramabhadran, J.C.(1) This is an appeal under Section 116A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, by Dr. Y. S. Parmar, against the decision of the Election Tribunal, Himachal Pradesh, declaring his election to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial