Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: subimal c roy · Page 1 of about 14 results (0.049 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 21 1962

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Salween Timber and Construction Co. (India) L ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-21-1962

Subject : ArbitrationConstitution

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 7, Rule 6; ;Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 115 and 120; ;Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 15 and 30; ;Interest Act, 1839 - Section 1; ;Constitution of India - Article 299(2)

Reported in : AIR1963Cal307

ORDERP.C.Mallick, J.1. This is an application to set aside an award. It relates to a dispute between the parties in respect to the supply of 292 tons of first class teak squares by the respondent to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 21 1960

Sugandha Pada Bhattacharjee Vs. Nalini Mohan Mukherjee and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Nov-21-1960

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Section 610(2)

Reported in : AIR1961Cal377,[1961]31CompCas283(Cal),65CWN110

ORDERA.N. Ray, J.1. This application raises a question as to the procedure to be followed in the issue of subpoena on the Registrar of Companies requiring him to produce documents. The summons has been taken out...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 16 1970

The State Vs. Haridas Mundra and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-16-1970

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 404, 411A, 435 and 561A

Reported in : AIR1970Cal485,1974CriLJ1341,74CWN847

Advocate for Respondent : N.C. Banerjee, Adv.

S.K. Mukherjea, J.1. The question which arises for determination in this case is whether the High Court in its revisional jurisdiction is competent to interfere with an order passed by a Judge of the High Court...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 22 1963

Raghu Nandan Neotia Vs. Swadeshi Cloth Dealers Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-22-1963

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 9, 166, 173, 186, 210, 211, 216, 217, 217(1) and 219; ;Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Section 42; ;Company Law; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rule 8

Reported in : AIR1964Cal247,68CWN302

A.N. Ray, J. 1. This is a suit for a declaration that the notice dated March 1, 1963, is null and void, and that the resolutions mentioned in the purported notice dated March 1, 1963, are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 1968

RamnaraIn Bhojnagarwalla Vs. Income-tax Officer, A-ward and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-02-1968

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 22, 34 and 148

Reported in : [1970]77ITR653(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : Gouri Mitter, Adv.

1. The petitioner, Ramnarain Bhojnagarwalla, was assessed to income-tax for the assessment year 1948-49 in the usual course. Thereafter, on or about the 19th March, 1965, the Income-tax Officer, A-Ward, District IV(i), Calcutta, the respondent No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 22 1964

In Re: Bengal Luxmi Cotton Mills Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-22-1964

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 145, 397 and 398; ;Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 88

Reported in : [1965]35CompCas187(Cal),69CWN137

Advocate for Respondent : Subimal C. Roy, ;S. Chaudhuri, ;R. Chaudhuri, ;B. Sen, ;M.K. Banerjee and ;P.K. Das, Advs.

B.C. Mitra, J.1. This is an application for various ad interim reliefs in a company petition under Sections 397, 398, 402 and 403 of the Companies Act, 1956. The material facts relating to this application are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 13 1964

Shalagram Jhajharia Vs. National Co. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-13-1964

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 173, 217, 217(1) and 294; ;Companies (Amendment) Act, 1960

Reported in : [1965]35CompCas706(Cal),69CWN369

Advocate for Respondent : Subimal C. Roy and ;Sisir Kumar Mukherjee, Advs.

Bose, C.J.1. This is an appeal from an order of A. N. Ray J. refusing an application for an interlocutory injunction restraining the passing of certain resolutions of a company known as National Co. Ltd. at...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 27 1958

Narendra Nath Dutt Vs. Jitendra Nath Dutt and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-27-1958

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)

Reported in : AIR1959Cal62

Advocate for Respondent : Subimal C. Roy and ;M.M. Sen, Advs. for respondent No. 3 and ;Sambhu C. Ghose, Adv. for ;Respondent Rabin Dutt

P. Chakravartti, C.J. 1. A preliminary objection has been taken by Mr. Roy on behalf of respondent No. 3 that this appeal is not maintainable. In my opinion, the objection ought to prevail. 2. The appeal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 14 1967

inland Steam Navigation Workers' Union and Anr. Vs. Rivers Steam Navig ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-14-1967

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391 and 394

Reported in : 71CWN897

Advocate for Respondent : Subimal C. Roy and ;Milan K. Banerjee, Advs.

Ray, J.1. This appeal is from the order of P.B. Mukharji J., by which a scheme of arrangement referred to in the order dated 3rd May, 1967, has been sanctioned.2.The petitioner, Rivers Steam Navigation Company Limited...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 19 1963

The Official Receiver Vs. Iswar Baldev Jiu and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-19-1963

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rules 2 and 4 - Order 40, Rule 1; ;Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 134A; ;Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1963Cal647

Advocate for Respondent : Subimal C. Roy, ;B. Ray and ;D. Gupta, Advs. for Defendant Nos. 1 and 2, ;S. Das, ;S.C. Ghose and ;M.M. Ahmed, Advs. for Defendant No. 3, ;A.K. Panja, Adv. ; for Guardian-ad-litem Gauri Mitter and ;J.

P.C. Mallick, J.1. This is a suit challenging alienation of certain debutter properties. The debutter was created by two deeds executed by Raja Pitambar Mitra and Rani Nandarani on January 18, 1806 and May 17, 1824,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial