Advanced Search Results

State of Karnataka, by Deputy Superintendent of Police, Indi Sub-divis ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 45; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 148, 149, 302, 342, 436 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 157, 160 to 168, 313, 315 and 428

Reported in : 2006(5)KarLJ85

Advocate for Respondent : C.H. Jadhav, Amicus Curiae in Crl. A. No. 276/1999 and ;Mallikarjun S. Masali, Amicus Curiae in Crl. A. No. 1201 /1999

1. 5th October, 1991 was a black Saturday in the lives of Phulabai, Vimalabai, Gourabai, Channabasappa, Masuteppa, Sadashiva, Malkappa, Shivanand, Shrishail and Mallappa Havappa Kattimani. It was on that day, these persons were burnt alive in...

Swapan Kumar Saha Vs. South Point Montessory High School

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Constitution

B.P. Katakey, J.1. On the basis of the petition dated 8.3.1999 filed by some concerned citizens of the city of Guwahati, addressed to the Chief Justice, highlighting various risk factors involved in overloading of students in...

N.K. Singh and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Service

Mridula Mishra, J.1. Common grievance of petitioners in all these writ application relate to inter changeability from super speciality to parent speciality department. Petitioners are mainly aggrieved by the action of the respondents/ Department of Health...

Abhishek Kumar Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Constitution

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Saikia

B.K. Sharma, J.1. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner, who was an aspirant for admission into M.B.B.S/B.D.S course for the session 2006 has assailed the legality and validity of the order passed by the...

Suraj NaraIn Srivastava Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Administrative Law; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 241

Reported in : AIR2003All259

Advocate for Respondent : S.C. Misra, Adv. General and ;S.A.H. Rizvi, Chief Standing Counsel for Opposite Parties Nos. 1 and 2, ;Anil Tiwari, Adv. for Opposite Party No. 6, ;G.K. Mehrotra and ;N.S. Chauhan, Advs. for Opposite

Vishnu Sahai, J. 1. This writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been preferred in person by Suraj Narain Srivastava, an Advocate practising in this Court over a decade, under the caption...

Shankar Prasad Nandi and ors. Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Service

B.P. Katakey, J.1. The petitioners, who belong to general category, by the present writ petitions have challenged the legality and validity of the gradation list dated 02.07.2002 issued by the Commissioner and Secretary to the Govt....

Smt. Bhunbai Sahu Vs. State

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law

Reported in : [2002(95)FLR329]; 2002(3)MPHT36(CG)

Advocate for Respondent : Goutam Bhaduri, Govt. Adv.

ORDERFakhruddin, J.1. Heard.The petitioner's husband Deodas Sahu was serving as Assistant Teacher in the Government School. The husband Deodas Sahu died in harness leaving behind wife and three minor children namely Upasana aged about 10 years...

Brajesh Kumar Singh Vs. State of U.P. and Another

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CivilConstitution

Reported in : 2001(1)AWC305; (2001)1UPLBEC20

Advocate for Respondent : Vinod Swarup, Addl. A.G.

G. P. Mathur, J.1. The petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 26.8.2000 passed by the State Government whereby he has been disengaged from the post of District Government Counsel (Civil). Ballia.2. The case of the...

Jagdishlal Dhody Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 39A, 225, 227 and 227(1); High Court Rules - Rule 4

Reported in : AIR1988MP4; 1987MPLJ317

Advocate for Respondent : J.S.L. Sinha, Govt. Adv., ;S.K. Dubey, Adv. President of Bar, ;J.P. Gupta, ;N.K. Jain and ;Arun Mishra, Advs. Members of Bar

ORDERT.N. Singh, J.1. Save by constitutional amendment, powers of a single Judge of a High Court to act suo motu under Article 227, in appending matter, of which he is in seisin, cannot he taken away.2....

Hem Chander and ors. Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (2007)147PLR116

Arvind Kumar, J.1. The appellants are aggrieved with the judgment and order of their conviction and sentence dated 27.1.2004 passed by Addl. Sessions Judge, Rohtak in Sessions Case No. 7 of 2003, by virtue of which...