Advanced Search Results
M. Bernardsingh Vs. Syndicate Bank, Nagercoil Branch by It's Manager a ...
Chennai
Oct-14-1999
ContractCivil
Indian Contract Act, 1872 -- Sections 62, 134, 172 and 173 to 179; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 -- Order 1, Rule 10(2); Stamp Act, 1899
2000(1)CTC314
Mr. Srivatsamani, ;Mr. J. James, Advocates.
ORDER1. The first defendant in O.S.No. 58 of 1992 on the file of the Sub-Court at Nagercoil is the appellant in this appeal. The plaintiff in that suit and defendants 2 to 4 therein are respondent...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAssistant General Manager, Canara Bank (Personal Wing) Vs. Sri S. Raja ...
Chennai
Jun-24-1997
Service
(1998)1MLJ346
Mr. N. Srivatsamani
AR. Lakshmanan, J.1. This writ appeal is directed against the order, dated 1.8.1994 made in Writ Petition No. 4220 of 1985 by P.S. Mishra, J. (as he then was). The facts of the case are as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRani Leela Kumari and ors. Vs. J. Zamberlal
Chennai
Mar-10-1980
Commercial
Tamil Nadu Pawn Brokers Act, 1943 - Sections 10 and 11; Tamil Nadu Pawn Brokers Rules, 1943 - Rule 7; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 177
AIR1981Mad29
Srivatsamani, Adv.
1. The plaintiffs in O. S. No. 1907 of 1971, on the file of the City Civil Court, Madras, are the appellants. The first plaintiff died after filing the suit and plaintiffs 2 to 6 are...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
K.V. Loganathan Vs. Pallavan Transport Corporation Ltd., Represented b ...
Chennai
Feb-18-1992
Civil
(1992)2MLJ219
ORDERK.S. Bakthavatsalam, J.1. The prayer in the writ petition is to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to pay pensionary benefits as commuted and quantified at Rs. 20,206 together with interest at 18% p.a....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRani Leela Kumari and ors. Vs. J. Zamberlal
Chennai
Mar-10-1980
Civil
(1980)2MLJ47
V. Sethuraman, J.1. The plaintiffs in O.S. No. 1907 of 1971 on the file of the City Civil Court, Madras, are the appellants. The first plaintiff died after filing the suit and plaintiffs 2 to 6...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskC.R. Corera and Bros. Vs. the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Pondicherry
Chennai
Jan-18-1974
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 9, Rule 13 - Order 17, Rule 3
AIR1975Mad213; (1975)1MLJ155
Government Pleader
Somasundaram, J.1. The appellant-firm had taken on lease several units of machinery, instruments, godown etc. from the Port Department attached to the Government of pondicherry. The firm had to pay Rs. 27,495.74 as arrears in respect...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR.M. Subramaniam Vs. N. Sundaram Iyer
Chennai
Sep-13-1962
Commercial
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rule 57 and 57(1) - Order 38, Rule 11; Presidency-Towns Insolvency Act, 1909 - Sections 9, 13 and 21
AIR1963Mad217; (1963)IMLJ113
V.P. Raman, Adv. for ;R. Krishnaswami and ;N. Srivatsamani, Advs.
Jagadisan, J.1. This is a creditor's petition for adjudicating the respondent-debtor as an insolvent under the provisions of the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act. It is alleged in the petition, that the respondent, who will hereinafter be...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSoundararaja Peter and ors. Vs. Florance Chellaih and ors.
Chennai
Jul-15-1974
FamilyProperty
Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 232, 234 and 235
AIR1975Mad194; (1975)2MLJ164
V.P. Raman and ;N. Srivatsamani, Advs.
Ramanujam, J.1. Defendants 2 and3 in O. S. No. 2 of 1967 on the file of the Court of the District Judge, Madurai, are the appellants in this appeal arising out of a suit filed under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPonnuchami Servai Vs. Balasubramanian and ors.
Chennai
Mar-10-1981
FamilyProperty
Transfer of Property Act, 1892 - Sections 53-A and 122; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 100 and 101; Hindu Law
AIR1982Mad281
T.R. Srinivasan and ;N. Srivatsamani, Advs.
1. The third defendant in 0. S. No. 896 of 1974 in the court of the Principal District Munsif of Pudukottai is the appellant in the second appeal. The plaintiff, a minor represented by his mother...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVathsala Vs. N. Manoharan
Chennai
Feb-16-1968
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 12
AIR1969Mad405; (1969)1MLJ402
N. Srivatsamani, Adv.
ORDERVeeraswami, J.1. This is rather a peculiar case. The petitioner instituted an original petition for a declaration that her marriage with the respondent in this court was a nullity because of his impotency. A decree for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »