Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: srinivasamurthy · Page 1 of about 613 results (0.334 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 30 1992

Soudambika Finance Pvt. Ltd. Coimbatore and Etc. Etc. Vs. Union of Ind ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-30-1992

Subject : Civil

Acts : Chit Funds Act, 1982 - Sections 4(3), 5, 6(1, 2 and 3), 7(2), 8, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16(2 and 3), 17(2), 18(4 and 5), 19, 20(1), 21, 22(2), 24, 28, 29, 30, 31, 39(2), 48(1), 50, 64, 75, 76, 77 and 79; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 245 and 246; Chit Funds (Pondicherry) Rules, 1986; Pondicherry Chit Funds Act, 1966; Chitties Act, 1964; Cochin Kuris Regulations, 1932; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860; Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 - Sections 45-N and 451; Tamil Nadu Chit Fund Rules, 1984 - Rules 4A, 13, 18(4 and 5), 28, 31 and 63; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 39(2) and 48; Indian Registration Act, 1908

Reported in : AIR1993Mad190; [1995]82CompCas302(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : V. Ragupathy, Govt. Adv.;K.S. Ahamed, Govt. Pleader

ORDER1. Since common and similar as well as overlapping questions of law and facts arise for consideration and submissions have been made by counsel appearing on either side, these writ petitions are considered and dealt with...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 06 1987

Barium Chemicals Ltd. Vs. Government of India and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-06-1987

Subject : Civil

Acts : Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 11, 11(2) and 11(3)

Reported in : AIR1987AP267

Advocate for Respondent : K. Jagannatha Rao, Standing Counsel for Central Govt., ;Govt. Pleader for Industries and ;T. Anantha Babu, Adv.

Amareswari, J. 1. An extent of 110 acres in Survey Nos. 57 and 58 of Pocharam Village, Yellanud Taluk, Khammam District was notified by the Government of Andhra Pradesh on 31-7-1972 as available for granting a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 18 1972

M. Mallikarnjunaiah Vs. Shivanna and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-18-1972

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 49; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 91; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 111 and 117; Mysore Tenancy Act, 1952 - Sections 5

Reported in : AIR1973Kant40; AIR1973Mys40; (1973)1MysLJ120

Advocate for Respondent : C.N. Ramamurthy, Adv.

K. Jagannatha Shetty, J.1. The defendant in suit for redemption of a possessory mortgage, claiming to be the tenant of the land earlier to the mortgage, challenges in this appeal the decree for khas possession made...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 06 2002

B.G. Dayananda Murthy Vs. State of Karnataka and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-06-2002

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Karnataka Urban Water Supply and Drainage Board Act, 1973 - Sections 65; Karnataka Civil Service Rules - Rule 419; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 226 and 227

Reported in : ILR2002KAR3892; 2002(5)KarLJ378

Advocate for Respondent : L.K. Srinivasamurthy, Government Adv. for Respondent-1 and ;D.L. Jagadeesh, Adv. for Respondent-2

ORDERP. Vishwanatha Shetty, J. 1. The petitioner in this petition is presently working as Superintending Engineer on independent charge. In this petition he has called in question the correctness of the Official Memorandum dated 7th June,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 04 1983

Commissioner of Income-tax, Tamil Nadu-i Vs. S. Balasubramaniam

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-04-1983

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 64(1) and 64(2)

Reported in : [1984]147ITR732(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : T. Srinivasamurthy, Adv.

Balasubrahmanyan, J. 1. Having six daughters in a Hindu family is no, especially when they are born in quick succession. The assessee, in this case, is the karta of a HUF. He sired six daughters in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 17 2006

Union of India (Uoi), Rep. by Its Secretary, Ministry of Industry and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-17-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 1997 - Rule 7; Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957 - Rules 12(1), 12(3), 12(4), 98, 118(1), 118(3) and 2043; Karnataka Civil Services Rules, 1958 - Rule 98; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 309 and 311(2)

Reported in : 2007(1)ALD577

Advocate for Respondent : K. Srinivasamurthy, Learned Counsel

ORDERRamesh Ranganathan, J.1. Aggrieved by the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, in O.A. No. 90 of 2006 dated 03.03.2006, the Union of India and the Salt Commissioner are before this Court.2. O.A. No. 90 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 2003

S.S. Sundaram Vs. Indian Overseas Bank Rep. by Its Chairman and Managi ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-11-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2003)IIILLJ119Mad

Advocate for Respondent : Srinivasamurthi, Adv. for ;N.G.R. Prasad, Adv.

ORDERE. Padmanabhan, J.1. The writ petitioner has prayed for the issue of a writ of mandamus directing the respondent-Bank to pay full pension to the petitioner taking into account the increase in qualifying service upto 33...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 14 2002

Jayashree Nayak Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-14-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 39 and 226; Karnataka State Universities Act, 1976 - Sections 2(7)

Reported in : ILR2002KAR5355; 2003(1)KarLJ396

Advocate for Respondent : L.K. Srinivasamurthy, Additional Government Adv.

ORDERP. Vishwanatha Shetty, J.1. In this petition, the petitioner who was appointed as a Physical Culture Instructor in the 5th respondent-College has sought for a direction to regularise her services as a Lecturer in the 5th...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 01 1964

Nazeena Traders (P) Ltd. and ors. Vs. Regional Provident Fund Commissi ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-01-1964

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Employees' Provident Funds Act, 1962 - Sections 1(3), 1(5)Employees' Provident Funds Act, 1952 - Sections 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 14, 16 and 19-A

Reported in : AIR1965AP200

Advocate for Respondent : P. Ramachandra Reddy, Govt. Pleader and ;B. Srinivasamurthi, Adv.

Chandra Reddy, C.J. (1) These writ petitions involve some common questions of law relating to the proper interpretation of the provisions of the Employees Provident Funds Act. 1952 (hereinafter called the Act). They are filed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 24 1991

Tamil Nadu News Printers and Papers Ltd. Vs. Collr. of Cus. and C. Ex.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-24-1991

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35F

Reported in : 1991(54)ELT206(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : Shri T. Srinivasamurthy, Addl. Central Govt. Standing Counsel

ORDER1. This Writ petition coming on for hearing on this day upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof the Order of the High Court, dated 9-1-1991 and made herein and the Counter...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial